They do this in the face of overwhelming odds. From earliest childhood boys are taught that the way to become men is to repress all evidence of the female principle. They learn to despise any sign of femininity in themselves or in their peers. The male/female identity that is their birthright is perverted by parents who were also raised to be incomplete beings. Fathers set behavioral standards for their sons, and because women have surrendered their autonomy, they defer to their husband's judgement. The mother agrees not to commit the cardinal sin of "feminizing" her son, or "emasculating" him by demanding the same loving kindness and nonviolence she expects from her daughters. The same women who at great cost to themselves nurture their children--who love and protect them as they journey from infancy to adulthood--allow their sons to be conditioned to violence. They allow them to be carefully taught to become the kind of men in whom compassion and concern have been diminished to the point that they will not interfere with the requirements of a machismo society. And then they teach their daughters that these defeminized, incomplete human beings, represent the true nature of the male.
Women do this because they, too, are incomplete. They must also regain a male/female balance--they must become more like men. They have to overcome the temptation to be dependent, instead of autonomous beings. Women must learn to act in accord with the dictates of their own conscience and not submit to the judgement of their mates. They have to take responsibility for what goes on in the world outside the home as well as being accountable for family life. But the pressures that keep women from manifesting the male strengths of action and overcoming are just as strong as those that try to keep men from manifesting the female strengths of compassion and kindness.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Sexism is a Sin Review,
By A Customer
This review is from: Sexism is a sin: The biblical basis of female equality (Paperback)
My first impression of this book was that although it pointed out the ways in which men (the male principle) succeded in overwhelming the authority of women (the female principle) the author does not treat this fact as if men had accomplished this unilaterally. Women hold up half the sky, and in this book they are protrayed as having initially cooperated in this takeover.The book traces this cooperative venture of males and females from the time of the Fall in Eden, until now. The author uses the bible to trace this development, and it reads like a fascinating--but not always elevating--story. Although I was familiar with Sunday School lessons about men like Abraham, Joseph, Jacob and Esau, the author brings out facts I never knew. They seemed so extraordinary I had to check them out in the bible to see if they were true. They were. The post-biblical section of the book gives information that was also new to me. Although I had taken certification courses in Women Studies I never heard about the theology of Ann Lee, the founder of the Shakers. She had a vision of Christ and emigrated to this country in 1774, specifically in order to establish a church which taught the female/male nature of God, and the need to establish this equality in all human affairs. After reading this book, neither the bible, nor the feminist version of history, will ever be the same to me.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Provocative, insightful interpretation of Scriptures,
By A Customer
This review is from: Sexism is a sin: The biblical basis of female equality (Paperback)
Many people doing biblical exegesis highlight those passages that accord with their worldviews and consider them "literal" while (arbitrarily) treating contradictory passages as "allegorical." In contrast, Rev. Hyland, while recognizing that Scriptures are often contradictory, considers all Scripture as meaningful. She looks for themes in the Scriptures, finding that a central issue of dispute concerns the proper role of women in society. The early prophets drew sharp distinctions between womens' and mens' roles in society. Hyland demonstrates that these early prophets endorsed the violence that this separation inevitable engenders. The later prophets, however, encouraged people to internalize both the "male principle" (action and overcoming) with the "female princle (caring and compassion). Hyland notes that Jesus Christ's ministry centered on encouraging both principles. His life illustrated that adoption of these principles promoted love and nonviolence. Unfortunately, only a minority of Christians have followed Jesus Christ's prescription for peace, and Christianity has consequently wraught much misery upon the world. Hyland demonstrates that following Jesus Christ's example is personally liberating, spiritually fulfilling, and a path towards world peace.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Good News! The Bible is not Sexist,
By
This review is from: Sexism is a sin: The biblical basis of female equality (Paperback)
Although I am committed to the equality of women I am also a Christian and have had to listen to a steady stream of distorted teachings regarding the place of women in the church and in the world. Although I knew they were wrong I did not have the expertise to refute what churchmen (and women) were telling me the Bible said. Until I read SEXISM IS A SIN.
Talk about a revelation! The author is a biblical theologian who traces the development of sexist attitudes from the time of Abraham and Sarah to the time of St. Paul. Although the scholarship behind the book is obvious it is not written for academics. It is a fascinating and easy-to-read story of people and events who, throughout biblical times, ignored the call of Jesus and of the Latter Prophets who called for social justice, compassion and mercy. Instead, men continually choose to use violence and power-politics to get what they wanted and then blamed their brutality on God. The author connects this insistence on violence to the development of a sexism that is determined to keep the female role of nuturing and care-giving confined to the home where it cannot interfere with the warrior mentality that operates in the larger world.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|