5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Literate criticism at its best, December 15, 2009
This review is from: Shaw on Shakespeare (Applause Books) (Paperback)
Irish playwright George Bernard Shaw was both a drama critic and a music critic before he was a playwright, and he excelled at all three. He was quoted once as saying that he didn't think that his reviews would be of interest to modern audiences because they would largely be about dead people.
Well, he was wrong. Simply as an example of stimulating ideas and beautifully crafted prose, this collection of reviews about the Bard's works (and nineteenth-century performances of them) is one that should never go out of print again. Shaw, a wildly opinionated man, considered Shakespeare the greatest of all authors in the English language, yet was strongly opposed to what he felt was pervasive, blind worship of him; he was highly critical of Shakespeare's work, especially the storylines of his plays. Shaw, though, had enough humility later on in life to admit that much of his putdowns of Shakespeare stemmed from professional jealousy. Shaw believed profoundly that a playwright must have a important reformist and social purpose behind every play that he writes - as he himself did - and he found that this quality was sadly lacking in Shakespeare. Whether he was right or not, the "profundity" of such speeches as "To be or not to be" and "All the world's a stage" was something that Shaw strongly denied; to him, those speeches spouted mere platitudes. (His favorite speech in "Hamlet" was "O, what a rogue and peasant slave am I", in which Hamlet, rather than voicing profound philosophical ideas, denounces his own inability to act decisively.) He admired Shakespeare for the effectiveness of the dialogue in his plays and for what Shaw termed his "word music", the sheer sound of the language that Shakespeare used.
This book brings out these highly original ideas quite effectively. Whether or not you agree with them may become an issue that is irrelevant once you begin reading, so forcefully and persuasively does Shaw express his views. And his views are not limited to mere diatribes against the Bard - Shaw had very definite ideas on how Shakespeare's characters (such as Hamlet) should be played.
It is also safe to say that were he alive now, Shaw would fiercely denounce many of the films made over the past twenty years from Shakespeare's plays. He strongly believed in presenting the playwright's work uncut, and exactly as written, unless it was a play that is not considered among Shakespeare's great works - Shaw had a special aversion to the seldom produced "Cymbeline", and even wrote a new final act for it, in blank verse yet.
One shudders to imagine, given his strong dislike of some productions presented in his day, how Shaw would rail against some of the films of Kenneth Branagh, notably "Love's Labour's Lost", which Branagh turned into a musical featuring the songs of Irving Berlin, Jerome Kern and Cole Porter, or Michael Hoffman's "A Midsummer Night's Dream", which features two scenes of discreet nudity, and has many of Shakespeare's characters riding around on bicycles. Shaw had no patience with "modernizing' Shakespeare, or for adding what he considered irrelevant "stage business" to performances. He could be cruel, though, as can be seen from his review of the legendary John Barrymore "Hamlet" (while graciously thanking Barrymore for inviting him to see the performance, he is polite but scathing about the actor's playing of the role).
"Shaw on Shakespeare" may seem like a book for specialists, but anyone interested in provocative, eloquent essays in dramatic criticism will devour it. It is not, I warn readers, a book for the typical "MTV generation", but they wouldn't want to read it anyway.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A wonderful book, February 10, 2010
This review is from: Shaw on Shakespeare (Applause Books) (Paperback)
If you like Shakespeare and Shaw, this is a wonderful book. Shaw, who was for more than ten years a theatrical reviewer, mostly for The Saturday Review, was exasperated that the world thought Shakespeare a better playwright, but nevertheless took up his cudgel when someone mounted a brainless and/or wrongheaded production of a Shakespeare play. (This sometimes happens, even today.) Shaw is not kind or gentle, but he is very, very funny. The book was out of print for years; we owe thanks to Glenn Young's Applause Books for making it available again. When people are feeling gloomy I have them read the first page of Shaw's review of A MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM. Even if they know nothing about Shaw or that play, they generally burst out laughing.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No