Shame and Necessity and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Buy Used
$19.99
Condition: Used: Like New
Comment: Item in like new condition with no shelf wear. BUT, missing the dust cover. Eligible for FREE SHIPPING!! Through the Amazon Prime program. This means your satisfaction is guaranteed! No hassle returns and great customer service.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Shame and Necessity Hardcover – March 24, 1993

ISBN-13: 978-0520080461 ISBN-10: 0520080467 Edition: First Edition

Used
Price: $19.99
9 New from $44.28 20 Used from $14.44 1 Collectible from $40.00
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$44.28 $14.44
Free Two-Day Shipping for College Students with Amazon Student Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student


The Road to Character by David Brooks
The Road to Character by David Brooks
Responding to what he calls the culture of the Big Me, which emphasizes external success, the author challenges us to rebalance the scales between achieving wealth and status—and those that exist at the core of our being: kindness, bravery, honesty, faithfulness, etc. Learn more | See similar books
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 254 pages
  • Publisher: University of California Press; First Edition edition (March 24, 1993)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0520080467
  • ISBN-13: 978-0520080461
  • Product Dimensions: 1 x 6.2 x 9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 4.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,838,246 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

From Library Journal

This book is about ancient Greek ethical ideas, primarily of Homer and the tragedians. Denying that modern ethical understanding is merely a progressive version of Greek thought, Williams contends that the ancients' ideas can illuminate our own. His question is how to respond to a view grounded in supernatural conceptions we have long since discarded. He examines Greek ideas of agency, intention, practical deliberation, akrasia ("weakness of will"), necessity, and so forth, analyzing which motivations the Greeks found admirable and, especially, how shame, guilt, regret, and forgiveness interrelate. Significant contrasts concern whether the moral self is characterless, what warrants self-respect, and how to regard unintentionally caused suffering. Clearly written, well argued, and carefully documented, the book should interest classicists and philosophers alike.
- Robert Hoffman, York Coll.,
Copyright 1993 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Review

"A dazzlingly clever and agile assault. . . . Williams's treatment of shame is brilliant. . . . Mr Williams's mind is subtle, his reasoning complex. In places this is a difficult book, but always because the argument requires it; essentially, it is a model of philosophical lucidity. And though it is deeply serious, we can often catch an ironic inflection in the author's voice." -- Richard Jenkyns, New York Times Book Review

"Brilliant, demanding, disturbing." -- Bernard Knox, The New York Review of Books

"Clearly written, well argued, and carefully documented." -- Library Journal

"Poets often prove to be much better observers of human thought, character and action than philosophers, historians or psychologists, who are apt to launch into theory and generalisation before they have a good description of what they are setting out to explain. This is what Williams's discussions of the ancient texts bring out in every instance, and what makes his book worth reading, not just for those who are interested in the question whether we have made any real moral progress, but also for those who are interested in the Greeks, or in the varieties of ethical experience." -- Gisela Striker, London Review of Books

Customer Reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
5 star
75%
4 star
13%
3 star
13%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
See all 8 customer reviews
The essays are brilliant and informative.
Raymond Kolcaba
Whereas Williams seeks to show that shame can be autonomous--we feel shame because we judge ourselves to be worthy of the attribution of shame.
A Philosophy and Ethics Reader
Overall, this book is a worthwhile read for those willing to put on their thinking caps.
B. T. Newberg

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

22 of 23 people found the following review helpful By greg taylor VINE VOICE on December 31, 2009
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Bernard Williams was a philosopher of unique fascination. He was a classics prodigy in school but choose to pursue philosophy. He engaged in a life long debate with all major schools of contemporary philosophy and most of the history of philosophy. He was a member of no major school of contemporary philosophy yet read them all and learned from them all. And after absorbing that whole history of learning, he seems to have learned the most from the early Greeks, i.e., Homer to Thucydides as well as from Nietzsche. Like many others, he seems to have seen Plato and Aristotle as taking a turn that has led our culture down ultimately the wrong road.

The argument of Williams book rests on his assertion that:
"...we are, in our ethical situation, more like human beings in antiquity than any Western people have been in the meantime." (p.166) This is because Williams' believed that our situation is "not only beyond Christianity but beyond its Kantian and its Hegelian legacies" (ibid.).
Williams believed that in our situation we can learn much from the writings of the pre-Platonic Greeks, i.e., Homer, Hesiod, Pindar, Sophocles, Euripides and Thucydides among others. These writers (along with the insights of Nietzsche and the tools of analytical philosophy) are deployed against several intellectual targets.

Early in Shame and Necessity (hereafter, SN), Williams takes on what he calls the `progressivist account', according to which "the Greeks had primitive ideas of action, responsibility, ethical motivation, and justice, which in the course of history have been replaced by a more complex and refined set of conceptions that define a more mature form of ethical experience." (p.5)
SN argues instead that there has been no progress made in these ideas.
Read more ›
8 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful By B. T. Newberg on December 6, 2011
Format: Paperback
Did the Greeks of Homer's era have a complete sense of self and agency? Some critics have said no, claiming that these concepts were not developed till later (some say as late as modern times). Bernard Williams counters these arguments, and further claims that early Greek ethical ideas were in some ways in better condition than ours today.

Shame and Necessity is an exploration of the working theory of action informing the works of Homer and the playwrights of his day. In order to make his point, Williams roves over a range of related concepts. In so doing he teaches us something about Greek notions of body, mind, soul, responsibility, intention, will, shame, guilt, honor, power, necessity, and freedom.

The book is based on a series of lectures, and Williams' style is erudite, literary, and subtle. To fully appreciate his arguments, one needs a solid ground in Classics as well as philosophy of mind. Nevertheless, the general reader can, with a bit of determination, learn quite a bit about the Greek mind, regardless of how much else is understood.

In the first chapter Williams outlines his contention that the Homeric Greeks did have a working theory of action, as against "progressivists" such as Bruno Snell, who claim that a complete theory only developed later through gradual intellectual progress.

The second chapter is where he begins to show this. One reason critics claim Homeric people could not decide for themselves was because they supposedly did not have selves to decide for. The notion of a unified "soul" is not yet present in Homer; there are only various parts of what modern people would call the soul.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By David Keymer TOP 1000 REVIEWERVINE VOICE on March 10, 2012
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
The early Greek philosopher Heraclitus once wrote: "A man's character is his fate." (Ethos anthropoi daimon) This quotation could be the epigraph for this book of essays by the distinguished philosopher Bernard Williams, delivered as the fifty-seventh Sather Classical Lectures at the University of California, Berkeley in the spring of 1989.

Williams's death in 2003 was much lamented in the profession for Williams had the happy and exceedingly rare ability to express the most complicated thoughts clearly, without unduly reducing them or ignoring possible objections to them in order to make them more easily intelligible. (His colleague at Oxford, Gilbert Ryle, expressed it this way. When you talk to Williams, he said, Williams "understands what you're going to say better than you understand it yourself, and sees all the possible objections to it, all the possible answers to the objections, before you've got the end of your sentence.") Williams was primus inter pares in the ability to express his views in a manner pleasing not only to fellow philosophers but to interested laymen. This is not to say that what he wrote was always easy to follow, but it was never harder to follow than the subject matter required for it to be a faithful recounting. Williams didn't shun complexity, which he found meaningful and beautiful. For Williams, complexity was a normal symptom of human living.

Grace is not often a quality ascribed to serious philosophical writings, but it applies to Williams's best works, of which this is clearly one.

Shame and Necessity is an eloquent, carefully argued defense of the view that the ancient Greeks, whatever their differences in viewpoint from the modern one, did espouse a coherent ethics and that this ethics still has meaning for us today.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?