Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio: America?s Ten Worst Hate Talkers and the Progressive Alternatives (Paperback)

~ (Author), Aaron Cutler (Author) "Comedian and television talk show host Jon Stewart once said of the CNN program Crossfire, "It's not so much that it's bad, as it's hurting..." (more)
Key Phrases: fairness doctrine, conservative talkers, million weekly listeners, Air America, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity (more...)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"Talk radio is one of America's most popular and influential media formats. In his book, Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio, Rory O'Connor reports on the shocking number of top radio talk show hosts who regularly spout hate speech over our public airwaves. This intriguing, eye-opening and hugely important work is a must read account of the dangers of blurring opinion, journalism and entertainment – at the expense of our democratic discourse and ideals."
— Walter Cronkite, American broadcast journalist icon

"There is too much talk – imbecilic, often hateful talk – on much of talk radio, as this provocative book demonstrates. O'Connor and Aaron Cutler deliver a lively, well deserved punch in the nose to these powerful bloviators."
— Ken Auletta, Journalist and Media Expert

Product Description

The highly politicized and often factually challenged world of talk radio dominates a sizable portion of America’s airwaves. But the dirty secret of talk radio’s success is the use of hate speech masquerading as free speech. In this book, Rory O’Connor tackles the “hate talk establishment” and shows how huge media conglomerates not only make hate talk possible but make it enormously profitable. He profiles the country’s ten worst shock jocks, including Don Imus, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Michael Savage, and describes how they use the guise of “not being politically correct” to ratchet up their anti-gay, anti-woman, and overtly racist language. He then shows how their celebrity leads to a climate that not only tolerates but actually perpetuates racist, sexist, homophobic, and xenophobic attitudes — making America a coarser, more dangerous place. A survey of the small but growing universe of progressive talk radio offers a respite from the verbal violence.

---

Product Details Paperback: 226 pages Publisher: AlterNet Books; 1st edition (June 1, 2008) Language: English ISBN-10: 0975272438 ISBN-13: 978-0975272435 Product Dimensions: 8.9 x 6 x 1 inches Shipping Weight: 14.4 ounces Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews) Amazon.com Sales Rank: #567,283 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books) Popular in this category: (What's this?) #49 in  Books > Nonfiction > Social Sciences > Communication > Media & Politics

---

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

› Visit Amazon's Rory O'Connor Page

Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Back Cover | Surprise Me!

Search Inside This Book:

---

Inside This Book (learn more)

First Sentence:
Comedian and television talk show host Jon Stewart once said of the CNN program Crossfire, "It's not so much that it's bad, as it's hurting America." Read the first page

Key Phrases - Statistically Improbable Phrases (SIPs): (learn more)
fairness doctrine, conservative talkers, million weekly listeners, talk radio today, radio talkers, progressive talk, conservative talk radio, shock jocks, conservative talk show hosts, air dominance, talk host, public airwaves, national syndication

Key Phrases - Capitalized Phrases (CAPs): (learn more)
Air America, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, New York, United States, Bill O'Reilly, Michael Savage, Don Imus, Trent Lott, President Bush, Clear Channel, First Amendment, Neal Boortz, Republican Party, Glenn Beck, Mark Levin, Washington Post, Hillary Clinton, Hugh Hewitt, Los Angeles, White House, Fox News, President George, Heavy Hundred, Stephanie Miller

Browse Sample Pages:
Front Cover | Table of Contents | First Pages | Back Cover | Surprise Me!

Search Inside This Book:

---

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

	79% buy the item featured on this page: Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio: America?s Ten Worst Hate Talkers and the Progressive Alternatives 3.5 out of 5 stars (8)
	10% buy Outright Barbarous: How the Violent Language of the Right Poisons American Democracy 4.5 out of 5 stars (4) $11.66
	5% buy The Family: The Secret Fundamentalism at the Heart of American Power 4.0 out of 5 stars (131) $10.29
	4% buy Idiot America: How Stupidity Became a Virtue in the Land of the Free 3.5 out of 5 stars (82) $17.16

Explore similar items

---

Tags Customers Associate with This Product  (What's this?) Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people. Check the boxes next to the tags you consider relevant or enter your own tags in the field below.  media studies(5) talk radio(5) fairness doctrine(4) right wing(4) limbaugh(3) politics(3) radio(3) conservative(2) hannity(2) hate speech(2) Agree with these tags? See all 12 tags... Your tags: Add your first tag

Search Products Tagged with   See most popular tags

---

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

---

 

Customer Reviews

8 Reviews 5 star:  (2) 4 star:  (3) 3 star:  (1) 2 star:  (1) 1 star:  (1)           Average Customer Review 3.5 out of 5 stars (8 customer reviews)		Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews 20 of 22 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars In impressive study, July 23, 2008 By  Timothy P. Scanlon (Hyattsville, MDUSA) - See all my reviews (TOP 500 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)    Amazon Verified Purchase I've been trying to figure out the right wing these days. I've been reading a lot about its history, its roots, motives. One of the right's favorite fairy tales is of the "left bias" of the media. So I've been reading up on that and ran across this volume. I didn't think I'd be that impressed with it. But first and foremost, I credit the authors with HONESTY. And that's something I don't often find on the right. For instance, they admit that Limbaugh--as much as I despise his hate language and utter nonsense--is good at what he does: radio. (Indeed, it reminds me of an argument I've had with some righties who argue that Air America's not doing so well business-wise is an indication of the strength of the left. I've argued that that's nonsense. My politics notwithstanding, I don't listen to Air America much at all. First, I don't listen to commercial radio at all unless I have NO alternative. Second, I don't want to hear, between shows worth listening to, infomercials on liberal cause investing and health food. Third, like my brother said, I don't want to trade a rignt wing rant for a left wing rant--and some of Air America's fair is rather preachy left wing stuff. I'd rather make up my own mind, thank you.) The book starts with Don Imus. That I thought was a little of a mistake. Imus is clearly a "shock jock" more than a political commentator. But he made the news because of his suspension after a blatantly racist comment. The authors ask legitmate questions, e.g., why was he suspended for as short a time as he was. But the proceed into the Top Ten Shock Jocks and #1 is Rush Limbaugh. So they may have put a little more emphasis on him. They admit, though, that, like him or not (I don't.), Limbaugh is good at what he does. In fact, in a section on him, they comment that Limbaugh was apparently put off at one point because his guests distracted him from what he's good at. In short, he might have a slight sense of ethics, even if it is completely narcissistic. The others include o'leilly, Laura Ingragam, Sean Hannity. Most are pretty harmless; the authors conclude that they largely "preach to the choir." (My biggest objection, in spite of their lack of balance, is that most are LIARS, expecially o'leilly.) There are some who are particularly caustic, such as Micheal [Wiener] Savage. In fact, while he may be "good" at what he does, I'm surprised he's still on the air. Not only does he lie to a degree that would make a middle school bully blush, he's more racist and abrasive than Imus ever was! The book then proceeds to the immigration bill which they contend the right wing shock jocks were instrumental in defeating, then into the Fairness Doctrine, which was eliminated by Reagan. (If you're old enough, and have any background at all in the media, you may remember that the FCC used to require "balance," i.e., you weren't supposed to have a one-sided view at the expense of the others). Interesting that the same right wing shock jocks were lobbying against the fairness doctrine. I can't imagine why... Interspersed with the test was interviews of various radio "personalities" right and left wing alike. Some denied the rightward shift. Many--like the text--gave the devil his due in asserting that some of the shock jocks are good at what they do. They gave you a lot to think about. Then there's a whole worthwhile section on alternatives and suggestions as to what to do and who to contact to curb some of the hate language. There's an important chapter in the book entitled "Air Wars and Conservative Dominance." It reminded me of a statement in a book I reviewed here quite a while ago by Todd Gitlin--I think it was "Media Unlimited." He stated, matter of fact, that radio has a right wing dominance and always will because, in effect, they're much more "us vs. them" oriented, and that sells radio. Despite the claim of some of those interviewed for the book--Limbaugh and o'leilly and some others declined--that there is NOT a right wing bias, I think it's obvious that there is. Everything about the book, the top ten especially, indicate that. There are things we can do about it, e.g., finding alternatives, challenging some of the rhetoric--which is how Imus got the boot after his racist tirade. I think it's necessary that we keep in perspective the "preaching to the choir" element of talk radio. (I have an aunt who has a radio glued to the local station on which Limbaugh preaches each day, and a father in law who reads o'leilly's books religiously, yet would be freaked if he ever tuned onto o'leilly's radio or television missions! I'm not going to change either of them.) I think the book is important becuase it describes what "we" are up against in this rhetorical battle. And I've argued for some years that the "Fairness Doctrine" should be reinstated. The authors and those interviewed don't think that's likely. But it puts many elements of talk radio into a PERSPECTIVE, and that's what we all need to consider. Other related volumes you might want to consider on similar topics are: Attack Poodles: The Looting of the News in a Time of Terror, by James Wolcott Cable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media, by Jeff Cohen Then tune in or log onto the many alternatives the authors mention in the text. 9 of 11 people found the following review helpful: 5.0 out of 5 stars An Eye-Opening Study, July 8, 2008 By  Zachary Pickens (Athens, OH) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)    I grew up in Ohio in a generally-conservative city where the people are not malicious, not purposefully wishing to crush the views of others, but have solid views on taxes, guns, and God. On the radio, Limbaugh is followed by Dr. Laura, is followed by Glenn Beck. You have to pick up Hannity from the next city over. When I listen to these "shock jocks" (ok maybe not Dr. Laura) today, I still think about how they are impacting my home city. I hear the half truths, major logical leaps, and hateful words that come out of El Rushbo's mouth and I'm baffled by the lack of outrage, by the lack of outcry. Sometimes I listen to see how far the man will go. Thus the need for "Shock Jocks". This book is a handy, compact guide to these offenders and their offenses. It details statements by conservative radio talkers that surprise and inform even me, someone who knows full well what these (mostly) guys are capable of. When I find myself, someone who regularly reads Ann Coulter, surprised by the things that conservative talkers have said, I know this book is timely and a must-read for media critics and those who strive for a healthy democracy. Most importantly, Shock Jocks highlights the reality that these talkers are distributing loads of news and (mis)information to a very large base of support. We cannot turn away and just say they are evil or that their listeners are sheep. We have to hold them accountable and fight against their missteps. This book will open people's eyes and act as a catalyst for change in the way we view shock jocks and how they spread their message of hate. 4 of 4 people found the following review helpful: 4.0 out of 5 stars Tempest in a teapot, June 25, 2009 By  Garman Lord - See all my reviews America is changing, and not for the more beautiful, there's no way around that. In keeping with the general coarsening of the culture, a certain subculture that would have been totally relegated to the lunatic fringe mere decades ago has in recent years cropped up and managed to take over and stake out significant media turf and visibility. But of course that's all by comparison to a fundamentally different America, back in a day when a schoolkid's worst transgressions on campus might have been shooting spitballs or being late for class, rather than drug dealing, rape or murder, and his most dreaded punishment might have been a half hour of after school detention rather than half a lifetime in the joint. I'm speaking here, of course, of the subculture of what has come to be known as "Wingnut AM radio," also including Fox News type "entertainment," right wing rant literature, the whole package, today consumed as the exclusive intellectual fare of a steadily dwindling but significant and important segment of the American general population. As is author O'Connor, who seems to think this intransigently dissident cultural hairball in our national gut is the greatest threat to America today. And perhaps it is, yet O'Connor's own decidedly leftist biases can't be disregarded in assessing his book, which comes down passionately hard on the right-wing crowd. To O'Connor's credit, his assessment, though somewhat alarmistly harsh, is fairer, more balanced, more responsible and more honest than most of the rhetoric currently bloviating in from the Right, yet it's still the kind of talk that, like that from the Right, more or less turns the Middle ground where most Americans actually live into a no-man's-land. To O'Connor, Right Wing talkers rarely talk; they inevitably "spew;" that sort of thing. It is for the general despoliation of that sociopolitical middle ground that the deafening tub-thumping of both extremes probably equally deserves a kick in the pants from the rest of us. Like, if you can't shut up, at least turn the volume down, clean up your act and start making sense. Making sense, however, is not what got the Right into occupancy of the cultural baby-spot they enjoy today, any more than is overestimating the intelligence of the American public, and all of this sociocultural background noise is probably going to get worse before it ever gets better. To O'Connor's credit, his coverage of his difficult subject matter is fairly comprehensive, presenting lots of data and a reasonably complete picture with minimal self-serving hype or hysteria. For the great majority of Americans who don't watch or listen to this stuff, it's a pretty good crash course that can't solve the problem, but can shed enough light on it to spare you having to sit through it all at first hand yourself.		Ad feedback   Most Recent Customer Reviews 3.0 out of 5 stars 1 + 1 = not 2? While well articulated, the core argument of this author is irrational. Free speech is the ability to speak freely. Read more Published 2 months ago by Mathias 2.0 out of 5 stars nothing new here It's hard to imagine a need for this book. It covers no new ground and would conceivably be of use to someone completely unfamiliar with the Hannity/Limbaugh/O'Reilly axis and its... Read more Published 4 months ago by Condorman 1.0 out of 5 stars Garbage as Gospel!! This is an unmitigated pile of "bleep." (CENSORED BY PROGRESSIVES) Dont't waste your time, your money, or your mental health by reading it-unless of course you buy into all of... Read more Published 6 months ago by Mark Henry 4.0 out of 5 stars Naming and blaming the merchants of terror talk Just how harmful is "hate radio?" Some of us are entertained by it, others outraged by the outright lies, the half-truths and the somersaults of rationality - and still others... Read more Published 8 months ago by William Courson 4.0 out of 5 stars Well researched tome I learned alot about several of these "Top Ten" shock jocks, reading the individual chapters on names like Rush L, Sean H., Michael S., et. al. Read more Published 16 months ago by Phil S. Search Customer Reviews Only search this product's reviews

---

Customer Discussions

This product's forum Discussion Replies Latest Post No discussions yet Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight Start a new discussion Topic: First post: Receive e-mail when new posts are made Prompts for sign-in   Guidelines Active discussions in related forums Discussion Replies Latest Post politics Sammy Sosa 6 4 minutes ago politics Cuba "drastically cutting energy" - where are those Congressional Fools who Praised Castro? 88 6 minutes ago politics Posters of Amazon; I wish you a Very Very Sad New Year 817 7 minutes ago politics Do you believe 9-11-01 disaster was an "Inside Job" ? 7442 8 minutes ago politics About that evidence...where is it? 111 17 minutes ago radio Tivoli Audio 4 10 days ago radio Radio/TV combinations 43 11 days ago Search Customer Discussions Search all Amazon discussions

The Media Studies community Latest activity 16 hours ago 530 customers have contributed 557 products, 3 discussions and more... › Explore the community The Politics community Latest activity 50 minutes ago 12,244 customers have contributed 9,569 products, 1,023 discussions and more... › Explore the community The Radio community Latest activity 2 hours ago 2,635 customers have contributed 1,618 products, 68 lists & guides and more... › Explore the community Related forums media studies (3 discussions) politics (1023 discussions) radio (5 discussions) talk radio (1 discussion) Explore more › See all Customer Communities › Your communities

---

Listmania!

Was fascism actually defeated?: A list by Preston C. Enright Create a Listmania! list

Search Listmania!

---

So You'd Like to...

Monitor right-wing radio.: A guide by Preston C. Enright   Escape the Corporate Warfare Matrix.: A guide by Preston C. Enright Create a guide

Search Guides

---

Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)

Be the first person to add an article about this item at Amapedia.com.

› See featured Amapedia.com articles

---

Look for Similar Items by Category

• Books > Entertainment > Radio > General Broadcasting
• Books > Nonfiction > Politics
• Books > Nonfiction > Social Sciences > Communication > Media & Politics
• Books > Nonfiction > Social Sciences > Media Studies
• Books > Nonfiction > Social Sciences > Political Science > Political Doctrines
• Books > Nonfiction > Social Sciences > Popular Culture
• Books > Nonfiction > Social Sciences > Sociology

---

Look for Similar Items by Subject

Search Books by subject:
Mass Communication Media And Politics
Radio Broadcasting
Social Science
Pop Arts / Pop Culture
Sociology
Media Studies - Electronic Media
Political Ideologies - Conservatism & Liberalism
Radio - General
Social Science / Media Studies
General
Media Studies
Political aspects
Radio in politics
Radio talk shows
United States


i.e., each book must be in subject 1 AND subject 2 AND ...

Ad feedback

 

Feedback If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.  Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images? Is there any other feedback you would like to provide? Your comments can help make our site better for everyone. Please note that we are unable to respond directly to all feedback submitted via this form, but we'll ask you to sign in so we can contact you if needed.

Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.

› View and edit your browsing history

Get to Know Us Careers Investor Relations Press Releases Amazon and Our Planet Make Money with Us Sell on Amazon Join Associates Self-publish with Us › See all Let Us Help You Shipping Rates & Policies Amazon Prime Returns Help

Canada | China | France | Germany | Japan | United Kingdom  And don't forget: Amazon Windowshop | AmazonWireless | Askville | Audible | DPReview | Endless | IMDb | Shopbop | SoundUnwound | Warehouse Deals by Amazon | Zappos Conditions of Use | Privacy Notice  © 1996-2009, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates

Product Details

• Paperback: 226 pages
• Publisher: AlterNet Books; 1st edition (June 1, 2008)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 0975272438
• ISBN-13: 978-0975272435
• Product Dimensions: 8.9 x 6 x 1 inches
• Shipping Weight: 14.4 ounces
• Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (8 customer reviews)
• Amazon.com Sales Rank: #567,283 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

  Popular in this category: (What's this?)

  #49 in

  Books > Nonfiction > Social Sciences > Communication > Media & Politics

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

20 of 22 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars In impressive study, July 23, 2008

By	Timothy P. Scanlon (Hyattsville, MDUSA) - See all my reviews (TOP 500 REVIEWER)    (REAL NAME)

Amazon Verified Purchase

I've been trying to figure out the right wing these days. I've been reading a lot about its history, its roots, motives. One of the right's favorite fairy tales is of the "left bias" of the media. So I've been reading up on that and ran across this volume.

I didn't think I'd be that impressed with it. But first and foremost, I credit the authors with HONESTY. And that's something I don't often find on the right. For instance, they admit that Limbaugh--as much as I despise his hate language and utter nonsense--is good at what he does: radio. (Indeed, it reminds me of an argument I've had with some righties who argue that Air America's not doing so well business-wise is an indication of the strength of the left. I've argued that that's nonsense. My politics notwithstanding, I don't listen to Air America much at all. First, I don't listen to commercial radio at all unless I have NO alternative. Second, I don't want to hear, between shows worth listening to, infomercials on liberal cause investing and health food. Third, like my brother said, I don't want to trade a rignt wing rant for a left wing rant--and some of Air America's fair is rather preachy left wing stuff. I'd rather make up my own mind, thank you.)

The book starts with Don Imus. That I thought was a little of a mistake. Imus is clearly a "shock jock" more than a political commentator. But he made the news because of his suspension after a blatantly racist comment. The authors ask legitmate questions, e.g., why was he suspended for as short a time as he was. But the proceed into the Top Ten Shock Jocks and #1 is Rush Limbaugh. So they may have put a little more emphasis on him.

They admit, though, that, like him or not (I don't.), Limbaugh is good at what he does. In fact, in a section on him, they comment that Limbaugh was apparently put off at one point because his guests distracted him from what he's good at. In short, he might have a slight sense of ethics, even if it is completely narcissistic.

The others include o'leilly, Laura Ingragam, Sean Hannity. Most are pretty harmless; the authors conclude that they largely "preach to the choir." (My biggest objection, in spite of their lack of balance, is that most are LIARS, expecially o'leilly.) There are some who are particularly caustic, such as Micheal [Wiener] Savage. In fact, while he may be "good" at what he does, I'm surprised he's still on the air. Not only does he lie to a degree that would make a middle school bully blush, he's more racist and abrasive than Imus ever was!

The book then proceeds to the immigration bill which they contend the right wing shock jocks were instrumental in defeating, then into the Fairness Doctrine, which was eliminated by Reagan. (If you're old enough, and have any background at all in the media, you may remember that the FCC used to require "balance," i.e., you weren't supposed to have a one-sided view at the expense of the others). Interesting that the same right wing shock jocks were lobbying against the fairness doctrine. I can't imagine why...

Interspersed with the test was interviews of various radio "personalities" right and left wing alike. Some denied the rightward shift. Many--like the text--gave the devil his due in asserting that some of the shock jocks are good at what they do. They gave you a lot to think about.

Then there's a whole worthwhile section on alternatives and suggestions as to what to do and who to contact to curb some of the hate language.

There's an important chapter in the book entitled "Air Wars and Conservative Dominance." It reminded me of a statement in a book I reviewed here quite a while ago by Todd Gitlin--I think it was "Media Unlimited." He stated, matter of fact, that radio has a right wing dominance and always will because, in effect, they're much more "us vs. them" oriented, and that sells radio.

Despite the claim of some of those interviewed for the book--Limbaugh and o'leilly and some others declined--that there is NOT a right wing bias, I think it's obvious that there is. Everything about the book, the top ten especially, indicate that. There are things we can do about it, e.g., finding alternatives, challenging some of the rhetoric--which is how Imus got the boot after his racist tirade. I think it's necessary that we keep in perspective the "preaching to the choir" element of talk radio. (I have an aunt who has a radio glued to the local station on which Limbaugh preaches each day, and a father in law who reads o'leilly's books religiously, yet would be freaked if he ever tuned onto o'leilly's radio or television missions! I'm not going to change either of them.)

I think the book is important becuase it describes what "we" are up against in this rhetorical battle. And I've argued for some years that the "Fairness Doctrine" should be reinstated. The authors and those interviewed don't think that's likely. But it puts many elements of talk radio into a PERSPECTIVE, and that's what we all need to consider.

Other related volumes you might want to consider on similar topics are:

Attack Poodles: The Looting of the News in a Time of Terror, by James Wolcott

Cable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media, by Jeff Cohen

Then tune in or log onto the many alternatives the authors mention in the text.

9 of 11 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars An Eye-Opening Study, July 8, 2008

By	Zachary Pickens (Athens, OH) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

I grew up in Ohio in a generally-conservative city where the people are not malicious, not purposefully wishing to crush the views of others, but have solid views on taxes, guns, and God. On the radio, Limbaugh is followed by Dr. Laura, is followed by Glenn Beck. You have to pick up Hannity from the next city over. When I listen to these "shock jocks" (ok maybe not Dr. Laura) today, I still think about how they are impacting my home city. I hear the half truths, major logical leaps, and hateful words that come out of El Rushbo's mouth and I'm baffled by the lack of outrage, by the lack of outcry. Sometimes I listen to see how far the man will go.

Thus the need for "Shock Jocks". This book is a handy, compact guide to these offenders and their offenses. It details statements by conservative radio talkers that surprise and inform even me, someone who knows full well what these (mostly) guys are capable of. When I find myself, someone who regularly reads Ann Coulter, surprised by the things that conservative talkers have said, I know this book is timely and a must-read for media critics and those who strive for a healthy democracy.

Most importantly, Shock Jocks highlights the reality that these talkers are distributing loads of news and (mis)information to a very large base of support. We cannot turn away and just say they are evil or that their listeners are sheep. We have to hold them accountable and fight against their missteps. This book will open people's eyes and act as a catalyst for change in the way we view shock jocks and how they spread their message of hate.

4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Tempest in a teapot, June 25, 2009

By	Garman Lord - See all my reviews

America is changing, and not for the more beautiful, there's no way around that. In keeping with the general coarsening of the culture, a certain subculture that would have been totally relegated to the lunatic fringe mere decades ago has in recent years cropped up and managed to take over and stake out significant media turf and visibility. But of course that's all by comparison to a fundamentally different America, back in a day when a schoolkid's worst transgressions on campus might have been shooting spitballs or being late for class, rather than drug dealing, rape or murder, and his most dreaded punishment might have been a half hour of after school detention rather than half a lifetime in the joint.

I'm speaking here, of course, of the subculture of what has come to be known as "Wingnut AM radio," also including Fox News type "entertainment," right wing rant literature, the whole package, today consumed as the exclusive intellectual fare of a steadily dwindling but significant and important segment of the American general population. As is author O'Connor, who seems to think this intransigently dissident cultural hairball in our national gut is the greatest threat to America today. And perhaps it is, yet O'Connor's own decidedly leftist biases can't be disregarded in assessing his book, which comes down passionately hard on the right-wing crowd. To O'Connor's credit, his assessment, though somewhat alarmistly harsh, is fairer, more balanced, more responsible and more honest than most of the rhetoric currently bloviating in from the Right, yet it's still the kind of talk that, like that from the Right, more or less turns the Middle ground where most Americans actually live into a no-man's-land. To O'Connor, Right Wing talkers rarely talk; they inevitably "spew;" that sort of thing.

It is for the general despoliation of that sociopolitical middle ground that the deafening tub-thumping of both extremes probably equally deserves a kick in the pants from the rest of us. Like, if you can't shut up, at least turn the volume down, clean up your act and start making sense. Making sense, however, is not what got the Right into occupancy of the cultural baby-spot they enjoy today, any more than is overestimating the intelligence of the American public, and all of this sociocultural background noise is probably going to get worse before it ever gets better. To O'Connor's credit, his coverage of his difficult subject matter is fairly comprehensive, presenting lots of data and a reasonably complete picture with minimal self-serving hype or hysteria. For the great majority of Americans who don't watch or listen to this stuff, it's a pretty good crash course that can't solve the problem, but can shed enough light on it to spare you having to sit through it all at first hand yourself.