Product Features
|
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
| Key Features
| |
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Just right for the money.,
By J.P. Hibbs. (MO) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Shure PG58-QTR Cardioid Dynamic Vocal Microphone with 1/4-inch Cable (Electronics)
Building a home studio, owned a few mics before this, some were more expensive some cheaper. This microphone blows them all away, there's a reason Shure has such a good reputation in this industry. This mic is built rock solid, the switch feels really solid and I don't have to worry about it breaking. First time I used this I was absolutely amazed at how crisp and clear the recording was. I'm buying two more.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great Mic For the Price,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Shure PG58-QTR Cardioid Dynamic Vocal Microphone with 1/4-inch Cable (Electronics)
I have another SHURE mic that I paid more for ( the 48 model)...this one is much more sensitive and works great! Highly recommended!
4 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Shure quality and construction but not quite equal to the SM58,
By Samuel Chell (Kenosha,, WI United States) - See all my reviews (TOP 100 REVIEWER) (HALL OF FAME REVIEWER) (REAL NAME)
This review is from: Shure PG58-QTR Cardioid Dynamic Vocal Microphone with 1/4-inch Cable (Electronics)
I started with the Shure PG58 and most recently acquired the Shure SM58. I'd probably be all too ready to agree with those who argue that a Neumann or Telefunken mic costing 5 G's simply isn't that much better than a Nady mic costing 10 bucks. But with respect to the Shure, I'm less sure that the SM58 isn't worth 40% more than the PG58. Perhaps if you have a sufficiently high-powered and "clean" amplifier and have tweaked the EQ settings to favor the frequencies of the human voice, the two mics could be mistaken for one another. It was my attempts to occasionally use an instrument amplifier as an emergency P.A. that led me to realize the PG58 sounded somewhat muted and dull compared to the SM58. Switching to the more common, admittedly more expensive mic, gave me just the extra gain I needed along with added crispness and clarity to the voice (at least for announcements).
P.S. I notice that the head of the PG58 is larger than that of the SM58. Since the rise of the "digital audio workstation" (who doesn't have a computer with free, included Garage Band on it?), large, even gold-plated, expensive-looking but cheap mics are on display all over the place. Despite appearances, when it comes to mics, size doesn't matter--except for appearances (directors of high school show bands will dispense those headsets that wrap half-way around the face, knowing that the girls in the front-line think they're cool--they look just like Madonna'a or Janet's headgear). Some of the best mics are tiny, with an opening the size of a pin-hole.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|