Customer Reviews


36 Reviews
5 star:
 (29)
4 star:
 (6)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (1)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


63 of 63 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Fantastic Value, for all your Dynamic needs.
This is a great all-purpose dynamic microphone for everything from amps and instruments to vocals, and it's far and away one of the best mics out there in terms of durability (they don't call them the industry workhorses for nothing)/sound/value. This'll blow the socks off those $30 mics.

But what's the difference between the SM-57 and the SM-58? Besides...
Published on July 15, 2005 by Douglas E. Wong

versus
31 of 63 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Watch out for counterfeit Shure 57 Microphones!
I just recently bought two 57's from two different Amazon dealers at a very cheap price of $70. After testing these microphones with other Shure 57's and having a couple of expert local sound technicians spec-out the microphones, we discovered that these microphones were total counterfeits. True Shure microphones are typically very high quality microphones when they are...
Published on March 29, 2008 by jazzcat


‹ Previous | 1 2 3 4| Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

63 of 63 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Fantastic Value, for all your Dynamic needs., July 15, 2005
By 
This review is from: Shure SM57-LC Cardioid Dynamic Microphone (Electronics)
This is a great all-purpose dynamic microphone for everything from amps and instruments to vocals, and it's far and away one of the best mics out there in terms of durability (they don't call them the industry workhorses for nothing)/sound/value. This'll blow the socks off those $30 mics.

But what's the difference between the SM-57 and the SM-58? Besides the grill, the main difference is Frequency response. Take a look at the charts in the manuals for both, and you'll note that in the slice of spectrum normally associated with the human voice, there's a boost with the SM-58. This may make your voice sparkle a little more on the SM-58, but if you were planning on possibly micing anything else, it's going to also have a boost in the same range, distorting the original sound slightly.

Plus, if you've got a decent equalizer, you can probably achieve close to the same vocal sound the SM-58 provides with just a little tweaking after the fact.

So, if you plan on using your mic for anything beyond singing, I'd suggest the SM-57 over the SM-58 (even though you may not look as cool holding it). And I'd definitely recommend this little baby over those cheaper models. Unless you need a condensor mic, this is the way to go.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


53 of 55 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Best all around for over 30 years!, May 15, 2006
By 
David L. Vasser (Charlotte, NC USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: Shure SM57-LC Cardioid Dynamic Microphone (Electronics)
Although this mic is now considered primarily an instrument mic, that was not always the case and I've actually preferred this same basic design for live vocal use since 1970 when I bought my first one which was then known as a "Shure Model 545 Unidyne III." That mic got stolen about 2 years ago, but remarkably was still working at the time it got boosted and I was still using it when I needed one with an on/off switch function. I've owned or used countless modern day SM-58's and SM-57's along with dozens of other mics over the years from all manufacturers. I have a fairly deep baritone to bass type voice and I don't need to get closer than about 7 or 8 inches to a SM-57. To me the SM-57 sounds similar to the $469 Shure SM-7 studio vocal mic if you put a windscreen on it and get about 2 inches away. I'd only use an SM-7 in a studio environment though because they are slightly more fragile and over four times as expensive. By design the SM-58's require you to get much closer to the mic to get a full range sound than with the SM-57's. I prefer the SM-57's over the SM-58's for vocal use because they sound crisper on the highs and they sound fuller on the low end. The SM-57 sounds more natural on vocals and never sounds muddy or muffled. The SM-57 has one of the most pronounced proximity effects of any mic I've ever used. If you tend to shove the mic down your throat you may benefit from the less dramatic proximity effect of the SM-58. If you are ever going to use an SM-57 for vocals I'd recommend buying the Shure A2WS windscreen with it. That genuine Shure windscreen fits precisely and locks securely onto the SM-57. The SM-57 will pop like mad without one. The only possible drawback to the SM57 as a vocal mic is that there is no model available with an on/off switch these days. I can't find a modern SM-57 with a switch anywhere. However, if you've ever tried using a mic when you forgot that the switch was in the off position it probably just became a liability. For my money, the SM-57 is the best all around microphone of the past two generations for stage use and some recording purposes. For studio vocals I'd use an SM-7, which really doesn't sound all that much different from the SM-57 when the built-in variable EQ on the SM-7 is set the way I like. The SM-57 and it's predecessors are to me the best all around microphone since 1970 and certainly the most enduring and durable. You can not go wrong unless you get too close with no windscreen.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


18 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Heavy Duty All Purpose Microphone with a Professional Feel, October 9, 2004
This review is from: Shure SM57-LC Cardioid Dynamic Microphone (Electronics)
The Shure SM-57 is a work horse microphone that is built solid and very easy to use in various music recording and live performance environments. It's best funtion is to mike a guitar amp and send that signal to the Public Address system if you want to phatten up your instumental signal to a wider audience.

It can be utilized as a vocal microphone. Yet, it does not look as prominant as the famous Shure SM-58.

To mike up the drum set means that you have to buy a quantity of the SM-57s'. Mike stands for the Shure SM-57's come in various dimensions of height.

As a dependable low profile microphone used for speech it is unsurpassed.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


13 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Industry Standard, February 26, 2006
This review is from: Shure SM57-LC Cardioid Dynamic Microphone (Electronics)
Seriously? The Shure SM57 sets the standard, which by all other instrument microphones are judged.

No kidding. They work great with guitar (for a REAL acoustic guitar sound, drums, congas, tablas... You name it.. if it's an instrument the SM57 delivers.

I hear it's good for vocals as well. When the President gives a speech, the SM57 is there.

In my experience a vocalist better have above average pipes to use the SM57. The SM58 is better suited to those who lack vocal projection (most wannabe's).

For instrument sound reinforcement... bar-none... the best.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


7 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars One Half Of Shure's Long Lasting Dynamic Duo, December 13, 2008
This review is from: Shure SM57-LC Cardioid Dynamic Microphone (Electronics)
Considering that the SM57 was introduced to the world in 1967, a year after the Shure SM58LC Shure SM58 Vocal Microphone, I guess the 58 gets Batman status, relegating the 57 to that of Robin. But that's not really a fair assessment considering the 57 and 58 were developed at the same time, and except for the 58's acoustic foam lined cage pop screen, the two mics are identical electrically.

The SM (Studio Microphone) 57 was designed to begin it's life in a recording studio, as a dynamic microphone used to mic the ever increasing volume of rock and roll amplifiers, drum kits, etc. In that capacity, it had no use for the pop screen of it's cousin the SM58, still one of the most sold vocal mics in the world to this day. So the SM57 slimmed down and even though it's still a fine vocal mic, you'll see it used mostly mic'ing instruments, which it excels at.

One of it's long time and most important roles has been the official podium mic for the White House. A pair of SM57's is always seen on various White House podiums for press conferences and there is even a VIP bundled kit Shure SM57 VIP Dual Microphone Kit you can buy for this exact type of use.

The SM57 is an extremely rugged mic, built to tough standards and can take lots of road abuse. That's one of the things that makes it popular with touring bands and sound companies. And on top of that, it's just a great sounding mic for the price.

There is a Performer Series Shure Beta 57A Microphone that looks very similar to the SM57 but the Beta 57 has a different mic capsule and transformer and sounds different. So make sure you try before you buy.

Bottom line is the Shure SM57 is one tough road mic that sounds awesome and is not overly priced. A best value for sound companies, home studio recordists and touring musicians.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars WARNING Excellent Microphone, BEWARE OF COUNTERFEITS on here!!!, March 10, 2011
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Shure SM57-LC Cardioid Dynamic Microphone (Electronics)
First, let me say up front that this is a 5-star product. An excellent microphone priced perfectly for the beginner to the advanced artist. The purpose for this review is to state exactly what another reviewer mentioned regarding fake\counterfiet Shure microphones. I purchased one here from a third party merchant named MASON35. Upon receipt of the product, it was very evident i had been scammed, and sure enough after research, concluded i wasted $70.

Shame on me for not keying in on the fact it was listed as NEW for $29 dollars less, but i honestly did not realize what a market there is out there for this model microphone in terms of counterfeiters and fakes until you google it. Seriously folks, DO NOT buy this product from ANYONE here on Amazon that is NOT an authorized dealer or reputable online retailer. Take a look at the list of merchants selling this product. You can pretty much tell who are legitimate stores and which ones are just someone posting an item.



Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Great for vocals or instruments!, September 23, 2008
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Shure SM57-LC Cardioid Dynamic Microphone (Electronics)
People will try to tell you that the sm58 is a better vocal mic, it's not true. The sm58 is designed to enhance only the sounds that fall within a certain range (the vocal range as decided by shure). This mic accurately portrays both vocals, miked instruments, acoustic instruments, and even some drums. I say some because we haven't tried the bass drum, might work for that as well, or might be too much, I don't know. Regardless, for a versatile mic that will last you as long as you need it to, buy the sm57.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Standard of Standards, February 13, 2009
By 
If there's a workaday mic in the world, used by every studio in existence as well as on just about every stage, it's the SM57. Generally regarded as about the best general-purpose amp mic there is, it's also used for instruments, vocals (yes, vocals), ambience, drums, and anything else you can think of. No mic fits every circumstance, voice, or instrument, but I guarantee you, the SM57 is right in the top dozen or so on the list when it comes to trying to fit a mic to a given situation. It's indestructible, sounds good, and is inexpensive. You really don't have a complete mic kit unless you have a few. I have several, and use them all the time. Look for deals and buy them when they go on special.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Impressive Vocal Mic on Stage, AND in the Studio, March 13, 2011
By 
Gordon K (Pacific Northwest) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Shure SM57-LC Cardioid Dynamic Microphone (Electronics)
This is my preferred vocal mic for live performances. I've been using it for decades. (The Neuman KMS 105 might sound a bit better, at 6 times the price. Then again, it might not!) And the 57 is a surprisingly good performer for vocals in the studio. I like my large diaphragm condensers for some things, but when I want to wail, the 57 is still among the best I've found. Maybe THE best. The special Shure A2Ws windscreen is the reason for my new appreciation of the 57. With the windscreen in place, breath noise and plosives are gone (unless I get really sloppy). I a/b'd the 57 with the windscreen against a Shure SM58. The 58's a great mic, but the 57 sounds more open in the top end (as other reviewers have noted.) Generic windscreens don't sound as good with this mic. They tend to be too thick and dense, blocking a lot of the high frequencies. Spend the $15 and get the A2WS. It has a set screw that enables you to lock the screen in place, leaving a small air space between the foam and the mic's grill. Gives it a nice, open, airy sound. The 57's not a high output mic, so you'll need a bit more gain in the preamp compared to some mics, but that's a very minor drawback.

For mic-ing guitar amp cabinets, this is an industry standard. Also good for snares, toms, even kick drums. (Take the windscreen off for these applications, of course.) It's probably the most versatile microphone ever made. At around $100, there is no better bargain.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Use of a Shure SM57, October 15, 2010
This review is from: Shure SM57-LC Cardioid Dynamic Microphone (Electronics)
I think that the SM57 ironically is a better microphone for speech than the SM58 - it has a wonderful frequency response curve, and also as a dynamic mike, I like the warm punchy sound it generates. Just perfect for live speech in a hall, but also perfect in the studio for recording voice-over work and I believe it compares, or would compare favourably with many higher end condenser mikes costing hundereds of pounds and this one is only around £85 if bought carefully over the internet!

When used for just speech, it does however need a good windshield and yes I agree with the other reviewer that the Shure screw-on windshield is the best. For doing studio work it would probably also benefit with a pop shield which I am yet to acquire, so for the timebeing I have to be careful with breathing when recording!

The other very slight drawback and not really a drawback is that it must always be used with a 3-pin XLR to XLR (rather than 0.25" jack) to provide a good 'balanced' signal and needs to be run via a mixing console as these dynamic mikes also need lots of input gain. Also for speech, I find the low equaliser (on a typical 3 frequency band desk), needs to be around -5db as they are quite 'basey' sounding mikes. The other settings for high and mid can be left on zero for speech; perhaps the high could be +5db - experimentation is best and much will depend on the voice/ instrument application

Overall the SM57 is a fantastic all round Microphone and all 'sound crew' should carry one in their kit!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


‹ Previous | 1 2 3 4| Next ›
Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product