| ||||||||||||||||||
Maybe it was Mumford's roots in New York that caused him to have rather emotional reactions to new architecture in the city. He attacked the plans for building Radio City in Midtown, criticizing the increase in congestion that another skyscraper was sure to bring: "When the cross-town traffic permanently blocks the downtown traffic ... and when the queues form at the subway stations at five o'clock ... the practical man may finally come down to earth. At present he is still in cloudcuckooland. It was by the cannons of cloudcuckooland that Radio City was designed." In various columns Mumford discussed such well known New York landmarks as the Museum of Modern Art, the Cloisters, and the Triborough Bridge. Throughout the book are attacks on stylistic atrocities, overspending, urban planning, and an occasional congratulations for a job well done. The 272-page book includes 16 pages of black-and-white photos. --Jennifer Cohen --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
4.0 out of 5 stars
A shout in the street,
By
This review is from: Sidewalk Critic: Lewis Mumford's Writings on New York (Hardcover)
This is a collection of Lewis Mumford's writings on New York architecture in the New Yorker. If it sounds very New York, it is. Mumford has an idea of organic architecture that builds upon the accomplishments of what he calls the Brown Decades around the turn of the century. He disliked Georgian and other older styles being refitted for use in the modern era, as he wanted new forms of architecture to suit new needs.
Beginning with two interesting autobiographical sketches, the book consists mainly of his column for the New Yorker, The Sky Line. Many of the pieces are so short that the reader doesn't really get a sense of what's being discussed. I would have really liked to see more photos, although there are two sections of black and white photos from Mumford's time. He often praised diners and shops more than big projects, and it would have been very interesting to see those little projects he liked. The best sections for me were those on Rockefeller Center - where we see him changing his mind over time, from hating it to a tempered appreciation - and on the Cloisters, which he loved. These are also longer pieces that allow him time to develop his theme of organic architecture. I have to admit that many of the things he disliked, such as ornamentation, don't bother me at all, but then he was writing before the Hideous Decades of the 1960s and 1970s when if a building wasn't unbelievably ugly, it had few chances of being built. Oh, and if it could tear down blocks of buildings that actually had character, even better. I was impressed that Mumford was already suspicious of Le Corbusier's projects, calling them windy. Being born after this monstrous architecture was imagined and built, I can only try to imagine the attraction before it was implemented. Mumford seemed to have enough sense to be wary of it.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organize and find favorite items. |
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|