Most Helpful Customer Reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Pretty good for the price, November 4, 2008
This review is from: Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX DG IF HSM Aspherical Super Wide Angle Zoom Lens for Minolta and Sony SLR Cameras (Electronics)
Not a bad lens. Fairly well built, but I do occasionally have a touch of chatter when I manually focus. The autofocus is fast, and the lens is reasonably sharp. Like other Sigma EX lenses, it has a nice exterior finish, and it feels pretty solid. I originally got it for my 40D, and it works well there. When I added a 5D (Mk I) body, I noticed a little vignetting at the wide end, but that's not unexpected on a FF body.
I've since gotten a Canon 24-105mm f/4L, and if I want to do more really wide angle stuff, I'd consider a prime. But for the money, and the convenience, this was a good starter wide angle zoom.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good resolution at 17mm, May 24, 2008
This review is from: Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX DG IF HSM Aspherical Super Wide Angle Zoom Lens for Minolta and Sony SLR Cameras (Electronics)
My impression is that from the resoution standpoint the lens is intended to be used at 17mm. This agrees with test results I found on the Web.
According to these tests this lens has better distortion @17mm than Nikon or Tamron and compares to Canon(L) 17-35/2.8. And I in fact can see that barrel distortion @17mm is very small, at least when used on a cropped camera.
Made a test shot with a sun in the corner. No flare, contrast is good. This surprised me a lot.
Focus ring does allow precise manual focusing.
Build is solid, but the cap is troublesome, but can be replaced by original Sony 77mm cap ($11).
Resolution at 17mm: good in the center wide open. Edges are good 1 stop down. Extreme corners 17mm/f5.6 only. I was satisfied with architecture shots made with f/8 aperture. I used 12mpx body and I compare results to Sony 50/1.4 and 100/2.8M not a kit lens. That's why the rating is only 4.
This is my first Sigma lens. I heard about varying quality of Sigma products, so I am considering myself lucky with this one.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A wide-angle zoom for certain situations, February 1, 2008
This review is from: Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX DG IF HSM Aspherical Super Wide Angle Zoom Lens for Minolta and Sony SLR Cameras (Electronics)
That's the best way I can put it. The Sigma 17-35 is a compact (3" x 3") and light (14 ounce) wide-angle zoom lens. It performs best in certain conditions:
- On cloudy days or when the sun is behind the photographer. This is because I found it to be prone to serious lens flare
- When there are no objects close to the photographer, as distortion at the edges is very noticeable
- When there is a nearby object (a car's wheel, a fire hydrant, for example) that the photographer DOES want to appear extra large and distorted
- Indoor wide-angle shots (I admit, this lens is great for that)
This is not a good lens for architecture, as there is too much distortion. For architecture shots, please see the Tamron or Sony DT 11-18mm f/4.5-5.6 Aspherical ED Super Wide Angle Zoom Lens for Sony Alpha Digital SLR Camera
So I would call this a niche wide-angle zoom. In terms of durability and construction, it is pure Sigma - it is very well built and should last a lifetime. One thing that I love about Sigma is the feel and the finish.
[...]
Given that the price has dropped significantly over the years, this can be a good addition to your lens collection, even if you already have the Tamron 11-18 as I do. If I do a photo shoot in a park or cemetery on a cloudy day, this lens comes with me, along with my primary, the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC SLD ELD Aspherical Macro Lens for Sony Digital SLR Cameras
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|