Sell Us Your Item
For up to a $527.25 Gift Card
Trade in
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Color:
Image not available

To view this video download Flash Player

 

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM II Macro Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras

by Sigma
4.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (53 customer reviews)


Available from these sellers.


  • Improved optical performance with a minimum focusing distance of 100cm/39.4in and maximum magnification of 1:3.5
  • Two SLD and three ELD glass elements provide excellent correction for all types of aberrations
  • Super multi-layer coating reduces flare and ghosting
  • HSM ensures quiet, high speed autofocus with full time manual focusing
Power Outage Essentials in Electronics - Up to 50% Off Select Back-up Power, Surge Protection and Weather Radios
Protect your valuable electronics against power surges and outages with great deals through June 1, 2013. Offer valid while supplies last. Learn more
There is a newer model of this item:
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG HSM OS FLD Large Aperture Telephoto Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital DSLR Camera Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX DG HSM OS FLD Large Aperture Telephoto Zoom Lens for Nikon Digital DSLR Camera 4.7 out of 5 stars (76)
$1,249.00
In Stock.



Technical Details

  • Brand Name: Sigma
  • Model: B001044RIQ
  • Lens Type: zoom
  • Minimum focal length: 70 millimeters
  • Maximum focal length: 200 millimeters
  See more technical details

Product Details

  • Product Dimensions: 3.5 x 3.5 x 3.5 inches ; 3 pounds
  • Shipping Weight: 7 pounds
  • Shipping: This item is also available for shipping to select countries outside the U.S.
  • ASIN: B001044RIQ
  • Item model number: B001044RIQ
  • Average Customer Review: 4.4 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (53 customer reviews)
  • Date first available at Amazon.com: October 2, 2003

Product Description

Amazon.com

Enjoy improved optical performance while retaining close-up ability with the large aperture Sigma 70-200mm macro zoom lens. The lens--which offers a minimum focusing distance of 39.4 inches and a maximum magnification ratio of 1:3.5--is suitable for a variety of subjects, including portraits, landscape shots, and macro photos. The lens offers two special low-dispersion (SLD) and three extraordinary low-dispersion (ELD) glass elements, providing excellent correction for all types of aberrations and creating high-quality images throughout the entire zoom range. The super multi-layer coating, meanwhile, reduces flare and ghosting. Finally, the lens incorporates a Hyper Sonic Motor (HSM), which ensures a quiet and high-speed autofocus (AF) as well as full-time manual focusing ability. Other features include inner focusing and inner zooming systems, a removable tripod collar, and a 77mm filter size.

Specifications

  • Focal length: 70-200mm
  • Maximum aperture: f/2.8
  • Lens construction: 18 elements in 15 groups
  • Angle of view: 34.3 to 12.3 degrees
  • Number of diaphragm blades: 9
  • Minimum aperture: f/22
  • Minimum focusing distance: 39.4 inches
  • Filter size: 77mm
  • Hood: Petal type
  • Corresponding AF mounts: Sigma, Canon, Nikon, Sony/Minolta, Pentax, Four Thirds
  • Dimensions: 3.4 inches in diameter and 7.3 inches long
  • Weight: 48.3 ounces
  • Warranty: 4 year

Product Description

This large aperture zoom lens has improved optical performance and retains close-up ability with a minimum focusing distance of 100cm/39.4in and maximum magnification ration of 1:3.5. This lens is suitable for taking all type of subjects such as portraits, landscape, and close-up pictures. Two SLD (Special Low Dispersion) and three ELD (Extraordinary Low Dispersion) glass elements provide excellent correction for all types of aberrations. High image quality is assured throughout the entire zoom range. The super multi-layer coating reduces flare and ghosting. This lens incorporates HSM (Hyper Sonic Motor), which ensures a quiet and high-speed AF as well as full-time manual focusing capability. The lens design incorporates an inner focusing and inner zooming systems. The overall length of the lens does not change during focusing and zooming, ensuring convenient handling. A removable tripod collar (TS-21) is included as a standard component. When this lens is used with the optional 1.4x EX DG APO or 2x EX DG APO Tele Converters, it becomes a 98-280mm F4 AF telephoto zoom lens or a 140-400mm F5.6 AF telephoto zoom lens respectively.

Customer Reviews

Image quality is very good. Gary M. Helland  |  17 reviewers made a similar statement
As far as build quality is concerned, this is a very sturdy lens, indeed my best built lens. Matthew R. Dale  |  9 reviewers made a similar statement
Now I have extra money to buy the Sigma 10-20mm. JeffP  |  2 reviewers made a similar statement
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
149 of 154 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Sigma no Nikon, but still useful December 3, 2009
At this point, almost every lens I own is a Sigma, the only exception being my Tamron 17-50 2.8 (which is a very, very solid lens). I've owned the Sigma 120-300 2.8 for a handful of days (the best lens I've used), and the Nikkor 70-200 2.8 VR. Both were returned due to the cost that I simply couldn't stomach at this point. I had read the professional reviews for this lens, and was worried about purchasing it because they weren't exactly glowing.
Well, I'm here to tell you that from what I've read, the professional reviews for this lens are spot on. That's good and bad, as anyone who's read them will know.

The good is that the autofocus in this lens is stellar. It's very fast, and is at least as fast as the Nikkor. The zoom ring and focusing rings are smooth, and the lens seems to be very well made, like all of my other Sigma lenses. Not only is the autofocus fast, it's quiet. It's really not that heavy, either, and I find it quite comfortable to use (compared to the 120-300, this thing is light as a feather, and it's weighted much better than the Nikkor). I also find the lens to be reasonably sharp through most of the zoom range, especially stopped down (as it is for most lenses, even Nikon). Yes, I did say through most of the zoom range.

The bad rears its ugly head at the long end of the zoom (which is really too bad, considering that's where you're likely to be keeping a lens such as this most of the time). At 200mm, this lens loses a lot of sharpness, and although stopping down does help a lot, it simply shouldn't be this bad. Are the photos unuseable? I wouldn't say that, and Photoshop can almost perform miracles in most cases. But what's worse than the sharpness (or lack thereof) is the chromatic abberation. There's a LOT. I mean, a LOT at 200mm. It's got the worst CA of any lens in my collection, hands down, and the worst of any lens I've used. Perhaps this is in part due to Sigma's valiant attempt to make a macro lens out of this one, and that's really the other fairly bad part about it--the macro isn't that great either.

It also needs to be taken into consideration that I'm using this lens on a Nikon D300s, which is a DX (small) sensor camera. So your results may differ should you use a full frame.

In the end, I'll be keeping this lens for a number of reasons. One is price. At a third of the cost of the Nikkor, this lens makes up some serious ground and can be forgiven quite a bit. The second is the autofocus. Wow it's fast. And accurate. Since I'm going to be using this mainly for sports, that's very important to me. And funny though it may be, the other reason is the macro. Yes, it's not great, but I still love having a lens with this zoom range that has macro capabilities. Apparently there have been major compromises to get it there, but it is what it is. I would have given it 4 stars, simply because of the cost, but in the end I decided on 3, because if Sigma want to play with the big boys, they really need to do a little better than this showing.

So in considering this lens, you need to ask yourself exactly what your needs are as a photographer, and will the advantages of this lens be enough to outweigh the disadvantages. For me, the answer is yes... but you have to make up your own mind.
Was this review helpful to you?
72 of 77 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Great lens...not a cheap alternative to the Nikon September 7, 2008
I was worried when I bouught this lens because I had only tried the Tamron copy, but my only experience with non-Nikon is with Sigma. I LOVE this lens. I got it for shooting sporting events for my university newspaper, and have had no problems in the month that I've had it. It autofocuses faster than the Tamron. A monopod isn't necessary because it's such a fast lens. Even at night with stadium lighting, the AF has little trouble.

The best thing I've heard for people wanting to shoot sports since buying this "cheap copy" lens came from a professional on the sidelines the firtst time I used my new lens. He said to my question about the Nikon 70-200mm, "Honestly, I turn the VR off when I'm not doing still portrait shots because it gets out of whack when I start following a moving person."

Made me feel VERY content with my decision to buy the Sigma 70-200mm f2.8
Was this review helpful to you?
30 of 31 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Fantastic lens, and an even more fantastic price May 9, 2008
I thought about going with a Nikon lens, but after looking at the features and prices, I thought this would be a better option. So far, I'm extremely pleased with it. It's truly sharp, even at 2.8. Focusing is fast and quiet on my D200. I could not be more happy with it. The accessories that came with it -- lens hood and soft case -- are nice touches, too.

And, in this price range, I also appreciate the fact that the focal range starts at 70mm -- and the macro feature works quite well at this range, too.
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Recent Customer Reviews
5.0 out of 5 stars Great lens, great price.
Lens came just as pictured, perfect condition. Love to use it, beautiful bokeh, and fast focus. Use it for portrait work and nature.
Published 2 months ago by Dsphotography
1.0 out of 5 stars Wrong mistake buying it!!!!
This is the worse and expensive item i've ever bought. I'm definitely not buying from this seller again. The itemwas defective and did not do the job. Read more
Published 3 months ago by Luigi
5.0 out of 5 stars Worth the money
I shoot everything from family events to music concerts, this glass as been with on all of them. Sharp images great picture.
Published 3 months ago by DDCarter388
4.0 out of 5 stars Made me a believer in 3rd party lenses
I've used this lens for around a year between two cameras, a D80 and D700. On both it's been a joy, the focus is fast and while shooting a tele at f/2. Read more
Published 6 months ago by A. E. Hamrick
5.0 out of 5 stars Great lens!
This is a great lens. Well built, good glass and super smooth focus ring. If you prefer manual settings/focusing, and need the ability to shoot in low light this might be one for... Read more
Published 9 months ago by Jg
3.0 out of 5 stars disappointed at first
When I hear "Macro" that means to me that I can get up close and personal- I want to see the glint of a wedding ring, I want to see the feather of a bird or flower petals, I don't... Read more
Published 14 months ago by Cynthia Dennis
5.0 out of 5 stars Sigma 70-200 macro hsm II
Was going to get the 80-200 AFS but couldn't find them but not disappointed. I shoot a lot of sports and my colleague got the AFS and it's a beautiful lens. Read more
Published 15 months ago by Benjamin N. Gendler
5.0 out of 5 stars For use with these Nikon Cameras: as of today
Great lens for low light or shooting fast moving situations like at weddings or sports. Used for night outdoors football shots and it did great. Read more
Published 18 months ago by Richard Barber
4.0 out of 5 stars need practice....
great lens i just need more practice holding still....heavy and well built...useing on a d90 the long end is a little blury but not bad
Published 19 months ago by john
5.0 out of 5 stars Awesome lens!!
I bought this lens to take pictures at my sons' high school football games. Let me start off by saying that the lighting on our field is horrible and the pictures that I was... Read more
Published 19 months ago by Missey6114
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Customer Questions & Answers
Please make sure that your post is a question about the product. Edit your question or post anyway.