Most Helpful Customer Reviews
28 of 31 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great Value!, November 2, 2003
This review is from: Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO Macro Super Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics)
I bought this lens as a long range zoom for my Canon Digital Rebel. It is an excellent value for the money and gives you incredible range! It comes with a lens hood and also a very nice padded case too. even though it does not state it here, the lens is actually the Macro Super II. this lens has a red ring around the top and comes in a gold box with a red stripe on it. make sure you get this version because it is the latest model. there really is no better value for a long range zoom than this lens.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
15 of 17 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Decent consumer lens, Comparing it to the L series is unfair, August 16, 2005
This review is from: Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO Macro Super Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics)
I disagree with Jeff Kershaw's review, in that it's very unfair to compare this lens to a L series lens, as those lens start at over $500 due to it's very specific high-grade optics manufacturing process. To compare this lens to a lens that starts at over 4X the price is like comparing a Honda Civic to a Porsche. Like the civic, this Sigma lens is well rounded, good for beginner and consumer SLR photographers, and maybe some "pro-sumer" on a tight budget, or even students. For the price, this lens is a bargain, as I've been doing a lot of research before buying this lens (price range in the $130-225 for telephoto). What I liked most about this is the APO lenses, which prevent reflection inside the lens which creates "ghosting" (inverted light ghostly shadow that appers on your image) which is usually apparent in nightshots. During the day APO lenses decrease those "purple fuzzies" (chromatic aberration) you see against high contrast (like a bird's wing against the sky). Granted this lens is no Porsche like the Canon L series, but for the price range, may hit the spot for some folks. I mainly use this camera for macro photography and taking photos of the Empire state building from my roof, which is 24 blocks away. This lens is definitely better quality than the Canon 75-300 USM III f/4-5.6 which is usually considered the benchmark for this price range telephoto. Also note that there are different versions of these lenses (despite close naming), so be careful about what you buy. The is a APO DG version with Macro specifically made for digital SLRs which is what is listed here (the "official" name of this lens is: 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO DG Macro), and a non APO version of this lens which is a bit cheaper (but not worth it at all). Also there's ones listed as APO II which is the "older" version, which I don't know the quality of, but know that it is older than the model listed here.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good lens especially considering the price, June 29, 2005
This review is from: Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO Macro Super Lens for Canon SLR Cameras (Electronics)
I like this lens, the Macro mode is quite useful for it let you stay a comfortable distance away while still captures nice close up shots (see the shared picture samples above). Pros: cheap, light, good sharpness and constrast stoped down (f/8) especially below 200mm range, 200-300mm is softer, but usable. Cons: need to be very careful about the shooting technique, at long focal length, the small aperture makes the lens very susciptible to camera shake, steady hands and high ISO and fast shutter speed will be the key for long focal lengths. Definitely no match for the canon 70-200mm family, but then those at many many times more expensive. Soft wide open, especially at 300mm focal length. For the 300mm focal length, you really can't find anything this cheap and offer reasonable performance.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|