18 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A Unique Book on Auditory Processing, December 19, 2000
This review is from: Signals, Sound, and Sensation (Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing) (Hardcover)
This book fills a large gap between signal processing and psychoacoustics. Standard signal processing books have in-depth coverage on Fourier transform, filtering, etc., but say little about what various signals mean to our ears. On the other hand, psychoacoustics books lack necessary mathematical rigor and insight for people who want to understand underlying computations. The book is written with remarkable clarity and rigor, and yet accessible to readers with just basic knowledge of calculus. The book does not just state conclusions but goes through the trouble to show how they are or can be derived, which greatly enhances understanding. An ideal book for people interested in auditory computations, and a required reading for my students in Ohio State Computer and Cognitive Science. I highly recommend it to anyone with an interest in acoustic processing and auditory perception.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good application of signal processing theory to psychoacoustics, June 13, 2006
This review is from: Signals, Sound, and Sensation (Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing) (Hardcover)
This book very much resembles an engineering textbook. It is written on the premise that a fundamental element in the science of sound as it is perceived is the signal. Thus, scientists who understand the mathematics of the signal are better prepared to develop and understand models of psychoacoustical effects. Therefore, this is not intended to be a first book on the either the subject of signal processing or psychoacoustics. Rather, this book attempts to join the two subjects.
This is very much a signals and systems type book, except that all of the signals and systems described pertain to audio and its perception. The quantitative emphasis in this book is underscored by the exercises at the end of each chapter. The author assumes that the reader has a fundamental understanding of calculus. Using that as a basis, the reader will learn a great deal about differential equations, Fourier transforms, and linear algebra, as these topics are covered in depth as they are needed. Throughout the book, topics that may seem elementary to those with an engineering background are interspersed with applications to acoustics and psychoacoustics that the reader may not be familiar with, so chapters should not be overlooked just because their titles convey the idea of remedial material. For example Chapter 6, on the perception of complex tones, at first looks like a simplistic tutorial on sampling theory, but it leads up to the interesting Shepard tones and the Tritone Paradox.
Along with the basics of tone and characteristics of sound, there is detailed coverage on the Fourier series and integral, signal processing, random processes and noise, and modulation, all discussed within the framework of applying these subjects to acoustics and psychoacoustics. Thus, some chapters are very mathematical while others are very conversational. I would highly recommend this book to anyone who has prior knowledge of both signals and system theory as well as acoustics and psychoacoustics. There is no other book I know of that is as good as this one at explaining the mathematics of psychoacoustics.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Hard stuff, November 8, 2004
This review is from: Signals, Sound, and Sensation (Modern Acoustics and Signal Processing) (Hardcover)
I read the book and it was quite a bit of hard work. I can only recommend to people who love maths. For all others, especially biologists and people more interested in the biological things: it is not worth the money.
If the author would use a more coherent and explaining style of writing and reduce formulas for every single detail it would be much better.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No