Buy Used
$4.00
Condition: Used: Acceptable
Comment: This is a ex library book, stickers and markings accordingly.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

A Simple Act of Murder: November 22, 1963 Hardcover – May 2, 2006


See all 4 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$3.51 $0.01

Best Books of the Month
See the Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Neither Warren Commission supporters nor conspiracy theorists are likely to be satisfied by this latest true crime effort by notorious ex-LAPD detective Fuhrman, who joins a long list of authors attempting to settle the controversies surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy once and for all. Despite Furhman's long-held belief that the president was the victim of a plot, his examination of the forensic evidence—the recovered bullet fragments, the autopsy reports and the legendary Zapruder film—leads him to adopt the lone gunman theory (although he thinks that previous proponents of that position erred in believing one of Lee Harvey Oswald's shots missed its mark). This clunky, lightweight effort is unlikely to change many minds and does not begin to approach the careful, reasoned analysis of Gerald Posner's Case Closed, which also defended the first official inquiry's lone gunman theory of the murder. Nor does Fuhrman fully address the many questions raised by serious conspiracy scholars such as Anthony Summers or Robert Blakey; for example, he completely ignores arguments that Jack Ruby's connections with organized crime bear further study. Whatever the truth of the matter, readers will not be convinced by his case for the thesis that this was a "simple murder." Photos and illus. (Apr.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Review

“[A] fresh take...on the JFK assasination.” (Kirkus Reviews)

“[W]ell worth reading for its clarity and single-mindedness ...a brisk read for armchair investigators.” (Philadelphia Inquirer)
NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 240 pages
  • Publisher: William Morrow; 1 edition (May 2, 2006)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0060721545
  • ISBN-13: 978-0060721541
  • Product Dimensions: 6 x 0.8 x 9 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1 pounds
  • Average Customer Review: 2.9 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (76 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #902,043 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Mark Fuhrman is a crime expert for FOX News and a New York Times bestselling author. Before FOX, Fuhrman was an on-air consultant for ABC, CBS, and Court TV.

Fuhrman served as a Los Angeles Police Department detective for 20 years, rising to fame as a key investigator and witness in the notorious O.J. Simpson murder trial. He lives in Idaho.

Customer Reviews

2.9 out of 5 stars

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

34 of 42 people found the following review helpful By Christopher F. Kiger on November 21, 2006
Format: Hardcover
Unlike Furman's other books, well-researched and written by a man who obviously knows how to investigate, this one was a disappointment. Furman totally ignored the Dallas doctors' observations of JFK's skull and the damage done to it. Taking only the autopsy material, and discounting the eyewitness reports from Dealy Plaza, as well as the reports from other than physician staff at Bethesda Naval, his conclusions are invalid.

If I didn't know any better, I would say that Mark Furman was merely fulfilling a contract with his publisher for another book that was due. Despite his self-proclaimed interest in the murder of JFK both from the personal and professional standpoint, Furman seemed in writing this book to not be interested in truth-finding. Afterall, it is the murkiness of the investigation, autopsy and conflicting medical examinations, to say nothing of the possible government coverup of the matter that have fueled the controversy for all these years. This book is overly simplistic, and I say that not as a "conspiracy buff" but as one who is interested in all viewpoints of the assassination, as long as they are thoughtfully conceived. Furman's is not.
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
33 of 46 people found the following review helpful By Tom on May 7, 2006
Format: Hardcover
Got a good laugh from all the negative "I think the hobos on the Grassy Knoll did it" reviewers. I've studied all the evidence for many years and appreciated Fuhrman's clear-eyed look at all the evidence. Modern computer recreations all support the lone gunman theory. I agree that Posner's "Case Closed" was better, but this is worth reading, as well. Sorry, Mulder!!!
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
11 of 15 people found the following review helpful By David Emerling on December 5, 2008
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
It is refreshing to read a book on the Kennedy assassination by a REAL crime investigator. Fuhrman, like any professional investigator, does not make wild assumptions and allows the evidence to lead him where common sense dictates. He does an excellent job of summarizing the assassination and then, in an orderly fashion, breaking down the evidence and assessing its value. As the title suggests, his ultimate conclusion is that Lee Harvey Oswald was solely responsible for the murder, yet, he adds a different twist to the sequence of the shots - dramatically different than the Warren Commission's conclusion. Fuhrman does not think that the Single Bullet Theory works from a geometrical and anatomical point-of-view. Be prepared for detailed analysis in this area. Fuhrman thinks that all three shots fired by Oswald hit an occupant of the limousine and that there was no "missed shot." Fuhrman believes that Kennedy's neck wound occurred at Z-187. Personally, the problem I have with that is that Kennedy shows no signs of distress and actually continues waving at the crowd. Kennedy shows no signs of being injured until he emerges from behind the Stemmons Freeway sign at Z-224. A 2-second delay for a bullet passing through the neck seems a bit extreme, in my opinion. This book would most be appreciated by real students of the assassination because of its technical and detailed analysis. Conspiracy theorists will naturally be disappointed unless they want to gather some good information to refute the Single Bullet Theory. This is more of a forensic crime book than a history book. It is also a very quick read.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By TLR on December 29, 2014
Format: Hardcover
James DiEugenio wrote on an internet forum that Fuhrman privately does not agree with the official story: "That was a put up job. I know this since I was on his show twice about [DiEugenio's book] The Assassinations. He is a conspiracy guy through and through. He liked the book so much he invited me back after the first hour long interview. He especially liked the two part essay by Armstrong. What happened to Fuhrman had a lot to do with the Simpson trial. Dominick Dunne became infatuated with him. After he was disgraced, he did all he could to restore his life for him. Among which was getting him a talk show in Spokane. He wrote that book as part of his penance to the rightwing network Dunne was in cahoots with. Like I wrote in this essay about McAdams, this is one of the things the RW network demands of you to stay in their good graces."
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
12 of 17 people found the following review helpful By J. Guild on April 25, 2009
Format: Paperback
After all the Conspiracy Theories ,Commissions,Investigations,Books,Movies,Documentries,etc.,Mark Fuhrman ,taking the detective approach,analyses the facts and methods that are the principles used in solving crimes like this;comes to the conclusion that the evidence supports the case that 3 shots could have ,and were fired from the window of the TSBD.The 3 shots came from the same rifle,there was enough time to accomplish the shots.It was not that difficult, and Oswald had the ability.There is no evidence that anyone was with him near the window.There is no evidence of a shot from anywhere else.There is an over abundence of theories of connections,motives and so forth.However,all the hard evidence points to only 3 shots fired by one gun and one person;that being Oswald.No other conspiracy theory has ever resulted in any other conclusion of another gunman being involved.Fuhrman does not even try to deny that there may have been a conspiracy behind the shooting,but, be that as it may,it has never been proven,only suggested,and that Oswald had the ability and did do it.If there was anyone else in the window who fired the shots,other than Oswald,and evidence had been placed there connecting it to him;then there is a possibility that someone else did it and when Oswald was shot by Ruby,it was to silence him. I don't think this was ever proposed,and it would have to been proved.
I have read a lot on the Assassination,and much as Mark suggests,if it wasn't Oswald ;then who ,and where is the evidence? There has not been the slightest proof for the case of another sniper ,or any other bullet from any other location...Just speculation and conspiracy theories.Theories are fine,but only the proof of a theory is what counts.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Recent Customer Reviews


What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?