16 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Well reported, but a little shy on perspective, April 26, 2010
This review is from: Sixty to Zero: An Inside Look at the Collapse of General Motors--and the Detroit Auto Industry (Hardcover)
I have known Alex Taylor III for many years and have long admired his work for Fortune. I also work for one of the companies he writes about, General Motors, in the news relations department. So I can hardly argue that I am free of bias.
That said, I think Sixty to Zero has some obvious strengths, and some equally obvious shortcomings. The strengths lie in its sketches of the larger-than-life characters who ran the U.S. auto industry from the 1960s through the end of 2009. Taylor has done a great job of bringing these people to life, complete with their sometimes tragic flaws. I also admire Taylor's honesty about the challenges he faced in covering these leaders and their companies. It is sobering to be reminded that even a reporter as experienced as Taylor and a publication with the resources of Fortune sometimes struggle to find the right balance for an important news story.
What's missing is a discussion of the outside forces that set creative destruction in motion in the U.S. auto industry in the late 1960s. For more than half a century, the U.S. auto industry enjoyed a closed market with stable energy supplies and minimal government regulation. Companies and cultures came into being to maximize performance in that market, and these companies were incredibly successful -- they were like the Google and Microsoft of their era. When the industry was hit in quick succession with new government regulations, new competitors from Europe and Japan, and wild swings in gas prices, these companies and their leaders found it difficult to change what had been so successful for so long, and they struggled to adapt. A bit of Schumpeter could add some much needed perspective to Taylor's history.
The companies that are emerging from this period are smaller, leaner and more global. Many challenges still lie ahead, as the auto industry deals with the rise of new markets and competitors such as China and India. But I personally believe that the new GM has a great future ahead of it.
Eventually, all industries come face to face with the kind of seismic shifts that hit the auto industry starting in the 1960s. The magazine and book industries are now entering a similar period of creative destruction. Perhaps in another 20 years, someone like Taylor will write their story.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Just OK, June 21, 2010
This review is from: Sixty to Zero: An Inside Look at the Collapse of General Motors--and the Detroit Auto Industry (Hardcover)
Sixty to Zero was a quick read. I felt that it only scratched the surface of the topic, compared to "Crash Course" by Paul Ingrassia.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not Much Here -, May 24, 2010
This review is from: Sixty to Zero: An Inside Look at the Collapse of General Motors--and the Detroit Auto Industry (Hardcover)
G.M.'s meltdown was some 40-years in the making, claims Taylor. It had served as a model of efficiency and organization that hundreds of others copied. It's decline was caused by bad management, combined with ego, and covered up by the ineptness of its domestic competitors and its once huge market share - 56% in 1962. The wide spaces between lines and letters in each word suggest the author doesn't have much to say, and that's true. His closeness to the industry led Taylor to write, as late as 2008, optimistically about G.M.'s coming turnaround. The book is almost entirely narrative/anecdotal, and lacks quantitative analyses - eg. why G.M. (and others) retreated into large cars, or caved in to the UAW. Just not much here -
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No