Product Details

• Actors: Michael Verhoeven
• Directors: Michael Verhoeven
• Format: Black & White, Color, DVD, NTSC, Subtitled, Widescreen
• Language: German
• Subtitles: English
• Region: Region 1 (U.S. and Canada only. Read more about DVD formats.)
  
• Aspect Ratio: 1.66:1
• Number of discs: 1
• Rated: NR (Not Rated)
• Studio: FIRST RUN FEATURES
• DVD Release Date: March 25, 2008
• Run Time: 97 minutes
• Average Customer Review: 3.3 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (9 customer reviews)
• ASIN: B0010YSDB8
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #158,653 in Movies & TV (See Top 100 in Movies & TV)

Editorial Reviews

UNKNOWN SOLDIER - DVD Movie

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

41 of 46 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars Subjective and uncritical treatment of the Wehrmacht controversy, little groundbreaking or new material., April 7, 2008

By 

MJG (Boston, MA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Unknown Soldier (DVD)

The subject of this documentary is the opening of the Wehrmachtaustellung (Wehrmacht Exhibition) in 1995, the now famous collection of photographs and documents that provided graphic evidence of German atrocities throughout the Second World War. What distinguished the exhibition from past scholarship on the 3rd Reich, was its depiction of the German Army, or Wehrmacht, as one of the main perpetrators of .the Holocaust - essentially no different from the SS, SD, or other Nazi organizations commonly associated with the brutality and mass murder of Hitler's regime. Although a full rehash of the Wehrmacht Exhibit isn't appropriate here, in short, the controversy that persists to this day is whether the photographs show individual acts of barbarism committed by German troops or, as the Exhibit maintains, irrefutable evidence of the German Army's complicity in Nazi crimes. In other words, are these photos proof that ordinary, rank-and-file German soldiers willingly, even enthusiastically, participated in mass murder? Or are these merely isolated cases that should not (or cannot) be distorted to represent the behavior of the over eleven million men who passed through the army's ranks?

Now to the documentary:

Scope: The film purports to provide an objective, balanced account of the Wehrmacht Exhibition, in particular the controversies over the exhibition itself, the public attention it aroused throughout Germany, and the circumstances of its premature closing due to inaccuracies among its photographs. In addition, the documentary attempts to further investigate the complicity of the Wehrmacht in Hitler's crimes and refute the notion that German Army had been a mere spectator, or pawn, during the Holocaust. To accomplish this, commentary from leading scholars, former Wehrmacht members, and Holocaust survivors would provide critique and broach a discussion on the merits and shortcomings of the exhibition.

Focus: From the outset, the film veers off topic from the original opening of exhibition and a discussion German atrocities and digresses to crimes committed by the SS, the first use of gas vans at concentration camps, and Auschwitz. Roughly 1/3 of the film consists of tangents on the mass murder of the Jews and the 3rd Reich's genocidal policies in the USSR and Eastern Europe. This desultory format is annoying at best - one has a hard time keeping track of the producer's arguments as the interviews and footage appear cobbled together with little forethought. Moreover, no new material is introduced about Wehrmacht atrocities during WWII.

Objectivity: This is by far the biggest disappointment. My hope was to see an unbiased, objective analysis of the Wehrmacht Exhibition and the subject of German war crimes under Hitler. I was looking forward to hearing feedback from historians and scholars advocating different viewpoints and walk away with new insights or at least a better understanding of the controversies this exhibit evoked. Instead, it was immediately clear which side the documentary took: while there was indeed a panel of respected history professors, authors, and politicians present throughout the film, without exception they were either directly affiliated with the exhibition itself or proponents of its overall message (I gave 2 stars because many of their arguments were compelling). Yet for counterarguments and critique against the exhibition, the film relies exclusively on soundbytes and interviews from right-wing (neo-nazi) politicians, angry, shouting skinheads, and a handful of disgruntled veterans. One gets the impression that those who disagree with the exhibition's thesis are either poorly educated or neo-fascist hooligans. Of the 10 or so professors and professional historians that appeared, not a single one offered any substantive critique, rather they lauded the exhibit or diminished those who disagreed with their views. The controversy and questions over Wehrmacht involvement in war crimes continue to this day. There are numerous journal articles and books written that by distinguished historians in Germany and the U.S. in criticism of the exhibition, and new research continues to emerge. As such, I expected a degree of critical dialogue and some back-and-forth debates. Very disappointing.

Conclusion: Ultimately - a letdown. One-sided, entirely subjective portrayal of the exhibit and the Wehrmacht itself, "The Unknown Soldier" doesn't offer any fresh insights or new arguments. Unfortunately, it's the only English language documentary on this topic to date.

12 of 18 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Were All Wehrmacht Soldiers War Criminals?, October 17, 2008

By 

Robert C. Doyle - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: The Unknown Soldier (DVD)

This documentary, designed for modern German and Austrian audiences, is startling, and for Germans born in the 1950s and 1960s it damns the older members of their families with a universal war guilt sometimes far beyond anything they can imagine. For some Germans, it is indeed cathartic to air the dirty laundry of the past; for others it's absolutely necessary, and for a third group, it can be a tragically horrid experience. This documentary rocked Germany's socks. I was a Fulbright Professor of History and American Studies at the University of Muenster in 1995, just when the Hamburg Exposition exploded on the scene. It did much harm as it did much good. Some old Wehrmacht soldiers, once proud of their wartime service, could hardly look their families in the eye. In a higher view of World War II, it does tell an essential and sad truth: that the wanton destruction of innocents including the premeditated wiping out of an entire people throughout Europe cannot be forgiven easily regardless of how much time has passed since 1945.

4 of 6 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Finally, Truth., October 4, 2010

By 

Richard Hill "WWII Historian" (USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: The Unknown Soldier (DVD)

As a student of the German side re WWII for over 10 years, If there is one issue that just hits me like a sucker punch, it's the continuing ridiculous notion that the Wehrmacht was a simple bystander to the "solution to the Jewish problem". (Now known as the Holocaust) Almost everyone, officer or above on the eastern front, knew what was happening and the others heard of at least rumors.

While Hitler, Himmler, and Heydrich were cunningly secretive about the genocide- they could not (nor could the SS) carry out such killings without the participation of the military. While I understand these older men not wanting to burden their families with such details, I hope the now elderly Wehrmacht soldiers don't expect everyone to be so naïve.

The SS was the primary organization yes, but supporting roles were needed and filled by numerous organizations including the Wehrmacht and Todt Org. I hope these men come to a point that they can be proud of their legitimate military accomplishments, while standing up to and taking responsibility for their moral failures.

This DVD itself, while not perfect, does a good job at raising the main issue. Why highly intelligent, motivated, ambitious, polite, good humored men- willingly followed the command of total paranoid psychopaths? Commands written and verbal to murder, kidnap women and children, and to destroy the evidence. (Commands all semantically vague, manly, and heroic- of course) And why did they try to lie about it, knowing there are thousands of witnesses?

The Wehrmacht veterans I'm sure would love to take the accolades for victories, while pinning the moral failings and military disasters on Hitler /the SS. As with nearly everything related to this war, it is not that simple. They are only delaying the healing process of themselves, the victims, and generations of Germans that come after them.