4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Underestimated, March 6, 2000
By A Customer
= Durability:5.0 out of 5 stars = Fun:4.0 out of 5 stars = Educational:5.0 out of 5 stars
This review is from: HIGH HEAT 2000 - PS1 (Electronics)
I've seen some of the reviews for high heat 2000 and I think they are unfair. I agree that for younger players and those not too interested in baseball the game might not be a good fit. I own all the other baseball titles being a baseball nut. I have to say the game I play most is High Heat. It just presents a greater challenge then the other games. High Heat has the most realistic outcomes. In season mode the batting averages are a factor of player skill as much as computer player attributes. I like that. Triple Play is an absolute joke in that department. Again some people like to have a game where you score runs on homeruns only. thats fine. But if you like the challenge, you can't beat Hight Heat at this price. Peace out.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Bargain Basement Baseball, December 3, 1999
By A Customer
= Durability:5.0 out of 5 stars = Fun:1.0 out of 5 stars = Educational:5.0 out of 5 stars
This review is from: HIGH HEAT 2000 - PS1 (Electronics)
This game is being deeply discounted and it shows. The players all look the same, no variety to their physique (even MacGwire looks skinny!). The batting interface is sloppy; it's hard to judge where to swing at the pitch. Pitching is OK, but handled better by the other current titles. The variety of parks is very good. About the only thing I enjoy about the game is the home run derby (because the pitches come in fast and straight), although it works best with sluggers. Finally, for a game this lame 8 blocks of card memory is a waste.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No