31 of 33 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
PERFECT camera, except that it's Wireless B standard.. :(, October 7, 2005
This review is from: Sony SNC-M3W Pan/Tilt IP Wireless Network Camera w/Audio (Electronics)
Firstly, let me state that I do not own this product, but as of only a few hours ago, I almost bought it.
The reason I am writing this review is because over the past few days I have been doing a lot of research, and learnt many things which I felt I should share with others. So let this be a review about feature comparison and not one from actual usage of the product (though I had it demo'd to me in the store).
My focus originally centered upon this Sony SNC M3W, the Pananosic Bxxxx model, the Linksys, and the Dlink. Very soon, for reasons I won't mention, it became clear that the choice was between the Sony and the Panasonic.
I really liked the Sony, as it had virtually all the features I wanted, the main purpose of which was to allow me to monitor my baby who is about to be born. The features important to me are that it should be wireless, and allow me to hear my baby (ie., has built in mic). Of course, the picture quality is important too.
In terms of these features, that is where the Sony shines and the Panasonic falls. Sony not only has a built-in mic, but also lets you hook up speakers, so that not only can I hear my baby, I can TALK to her.
The Panasonic, unfortunately, can do neither. This was a big disappointment for me, because I think apart from that, the Panasonic picture quality is better (I was comparing in the shop).
The key advantage of the Panasonic over the Sony, which is where Sony falls, is that Sony's wireless standard only supports 801.11b, and does not support 801.11g. If your wireless router is 'b', then it makes no difference to you. However, 'b' routers are increasingly out of date as 'g' is much faster, and if you have a 'g' router like me, then even though you can still use the Sony, your entire wireless network will have to run on the slower 'b' standard because of the Sony. I was unwilling to make that compromise, so I very reluctantly had to dismiss the Sony too.
btw, another difference between the Sony and Panasonic is that the Panasonic does not have motion detect (a feature I'd like to have for surveillance purposes). instead, it relies on 'heat sensing' to determine whether there's a person present. I dunno, but that didn't appeal to me.
So which camera had everything I wanted? It was actually ANOTHER Panasonic outdoor surveillance camera. That was a beautiful and wonderful product, which I don't think they sell here on amazon. The problem was, it cost almost twice as much as this Panasonic. That model series begins with a C. I couldn't fault it in any way, except for the price. It also uses a ccd lens which is much better tha the CMOS lens that both this Panasonic and the Sony uses, giving superior picture quality. Well, that's why the cost is much higher, and also cos it's designed so that you can even use it OUTDOOR.
So which camera did I end up with? A very little known brand called Planex. (www.planex.net). It was priced at the same range as the Sony and thsi Panasonic, ran on wireless 'g', uses a ccd lens, had a built-in mic, could pan-tilt at a much larger angle, but the only drawback (very sad) was that it wouldn't let me hook speakers up to it - ie., I won't be able to talk to my baby... Pity they don't sell the product here.
To close, I'd like to come back to this Sony model. If you are using wireless B router, and don't intend to upgrade then this is just about perfect. It also looks very sleek, though a little big (quite a bit bulkier than the Panasonic and Dlink). If you ever want multiple cameras, then this is great, because the platform allows you to hook them all up seamlessly, even though they may be different models (eg., the SNC M1, or M1W, or M3).
It's just really such a pity that a product being released this late in the game only supports the 'b' standard.
Anyway, hope my research helps you to make your decision.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
17 of 18 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Works well the first time - if your router is on Sony's list, June 21, 2005
This review is from: Sony SNC-M3W Pan/Tilt IP Wireless Network Camera w/Audio (Electronics)
For a wireless network camera with two-way audio, this model from Sony is an excellent value. Everything worked as advertised. The size is excellent and can be easily placed in many locations. There is a setup wizard which greatly helps in doing the network setup to make the camera accessible from the Internet. However, be warned that if your have a router that is not covered in the wizard list, you will need to know about port forwarding and do a manual setup. A business-class router firewall has rules that may require you to get some assistance, so don't assume you can just plug the camera in have have it work. That being said, if you know how to set up the router, the camera does what Sony says it can do, and well. Amazon's price is steep, well above almost every other dealer, so I expect the Amazon price will come down in the near future.
The prior review was written on June 21, 2005. Followup as of 10-30/05:
The camera continues to run well at a remote location. Another reviewer indicated that it wouldn't work with a D-Link router with encryption on, but I have the same setup and it works fine. The camera sends me a JPEG snapshot every day very reliably. I can access it regularly with both a web browser and the Sony recording software that comes free with the unit. The motion detection works well. I discovered this one day when someone was cleaning the windows at the remote location and got in the view of the camera. The camera started firing off warning emails to me.
Another reviewer indicated that they did not like the 802.11b wireless limitation. I agree, but from a practical sense this is not a real limitation due to most high speed connections even within a LAN not running a more than 10 Mbps anyway. It would be nice if Sony went to 'g', though. Also, the pan feature is quite coarse in its movement, with the panning angle changing drastically when you try to move it slightly. I'm not sure if this is fixable in firmware, but since it's so hard to even find the Sony support for these cameras, it almost doesn't matter!
Overall, the camera has run well, and several friends have now purchased theirs based on my experience.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
12 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Easy setup, great picture quality, April 13, 2005
This review is from: Sony SNC-M3W Pan/Tilt IP Wireless Network Camera w/Audio (Electronics)
I was looking for a network webcam, ideally one that could be remotely controlled via a browser. I stumbled on the Sony line of "M" cams and decided to order the SNC-M3W. Setup was easy, as the configuration tool discovered my router (Linksys WRT54G) and set everything up. I did change the cameras port assignment from the default, but that was also easy. Once the camera was initially setup using an ethernet cable, I entered my 802.11 info, including WEP key, and was off and running wirelessly.
Video options include MPEG4 or Motion JPEG at various resolutions. Using MPEG4, it's possible to achieve 30fps with full audio. Impressive. Routing the port through my DSL modem to the Linksys, and through the Linksys to the internal IP of the camera was also easy and my DSL connection provides adequate bandwidth for uploading the video. (Documentation says it requires 300K up). Motion detection or periodic triggers can send emails or you can FTP files at timed intervals.
The camera's web server allows set up of multiple users, logs access, allows preset locations for the camera to point, etc. On the PC side, video recording software is included that lets you schedule HDD recordings from one or multiple cameras to setup a surveillance system.
Easy to setup use or you can configure most anything manually, great picture quality and control all in a nifty form factor. I had it up and running in a few minutes time. It was better than I was expecting.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No