Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more

Southern Slavery: As It Was Paperback – June 1, 1996


Amazon Price New from Used from Collectible from
Paperback, June 1, 1996
"Please retry"
$58.95 $227.33

Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Big Spring Books
Editors' Picks in Spring Releases
Ready for some fresh reads? Browse our picks for Big Spring Books to please all kinds of readers.

Product Details

  • Paperback: 43 pages
  • Publisher: Canon Press; 1 edition (June 1, 1996)
  • ISBN-10: 188576717X
  • ISBN-13: 978-1885767172
  • Product Dimensions: 8 x 5.1 x 0.2 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 7.2 ounces
  • Average Customer Review: 2.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (23 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #3,246,434 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews

Can't think of anything I'd rather be doing...
Michelle Hope
Such a topic deserves sound and exhaustive historical facts to even begin to approach these subjects with serious thought.
Celestine Gibbs
In sum: this is not a history of slavery at all, but a new expression of pro-slavery thought.
Stephanie

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

7 of 8 people found the following review helpful By Surrounded on July 5, 2013
This book is an excellent example of the results of fixed thinking. The authors start by taking the Bible as absolute, unequivocal truth in its every word. No interpretation, no context, no symbolism - to them, it's as clear-cut as the DMV manual. They give several examples where a conservative Christian, like Jerry Falwell, was put on the spot by being forced to justify slavery, since the Bible clearly permits it. The typical response, even from Biblical literalists, is to suddenly start interpreting. Arguments given usually center on the differences between Biblical times and today. Slavery was so pervasive and necessary to the functioning of the ancient world, that eliminating it would have made about as much sense as eliminating automobiles and electricity today. Of course, only the most liberal commentators give the same analysis of, say, homosexuality. But the shared assumption, among both believers and non-believers, is that slavery is an unequivocal evil.

So you have to hand it to the authors of "Southern Slavery: As It Was" for not falling for this equivocation. Because if the Bible is wrong about slavery, it could be wrong about anything - therefore, the Bible must be correct with regard to slavery. The authors draw a distinction between "slave trading" (which the Bible forbids, and according to them, the Northerners engaged in) and "slave owning," which the Bible allows, as long as masters treat their slaves well. "Treating them well," of course, does not include setting them free and giving them their back pay; apparently, it only means giving them free room, board, and medical care, and speaking politely to them.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
65 of 96 people found the following review helpful By chefdevergue VINE VOICE on February 10, 2005
Suppose you are a son of the South, you consider yourself to be a good Christian, and (like most of us) would like to consider the deeds of your ancestors in the best light possible. In that case, you are probably at the mercy of conflicting impulses, since the sine qua non of the Confederate States of America was the preservation of slavery, and virtually all mainstream Christians today are in agreement that slavery as practiced in the United States was an evil institution. One cannot honor one's heritage without compromising one's heartfelt religious principals, and vice versa. What is one to do?

Well, the more prevelant route is that taken by most devotees of the Lost Cause mythos, which is that secession and the CSA was never about slavery, but rather "states' rights," whatever the hell that might mean. If one argues that rationale, all your opponent has to do is bring up either the Dred Scott decision or the Fugitive Slave Act, both of which utterly trample the notion of states' rights into the dust. In short, the states' rights argument raises as many paradoxical questions as it hopes to answer.

Another route is that taken by authors Wilson & Wilkins, who argue that 1) slavery was not contrary to godliness, and in fact it was the abolitionist movement which was contrary to the will of God; and 2) in any case, the slaves by and large were well-treated, well-fed and content with their existence. Oh yes, and it was the fault of the Northern slave trade that slavery continued in the South in any case, so if there is an original sin of slavery, it is to be found somewhere near Boston --- gosh, we haven't heard this argument before, have we?

The scholarship here, simply put, sucks.
Read more ›
11 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
43 of 65 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on June 6, 2001
Among this books several theses are that, generally speaking, blacks were better off as slaves than they are today; that most blacks liked being slaves; that the ante bellum South was the most godly society in the world; and that slavery was "used" by northerners to provoke a "revolution." This book certainly isn't politically correct, and that's refreshing in its own way. Wjat is is, though, is a staggering exercise in drawing massive conclusions from minimal evidence. This book isn't history. It's neo-Confederate propaganda. Pity the "ministers" who wrote this didn't have much interest in getting things right. (They also pretend as if abolitionist propaganda has been swallowed whole ever since the war, which is patent nonsense. Everyone who knows anything about the relevant historiography knows that it's widely recognized that the abolitionists skewed the facts.)
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
35 of 53 people found the following review helpful By Stephanie on December 13, 2004
Those who want to learn about slavery in the U.S. would do will to avoid this polemical and totally uninformed screed. Though it adorns itself in the veneer of scholarship, it is far from historically informed nor do the authors appear to have conducted any research at all. In sum: this is not a history of slavery at all, but a new expression of pro-slavery thought.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
73 of 112 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on January 12, 2004
As a Christian, I found this monograph to be wicked. The authors' use the Bible to justify southern slavery is pure evil, regardless of how "well" individual owners may have treated their slaves. This monograph literally made me sick to my stomach but made me aware that evil disguised as Christianity is unfortunately alive and well in the US.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Product Images from Customers

Most Recent Customer Reviews

Search
ARRAY(0x9b03854c)