|
|
6 Reviews
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Missing Stone!,
By
This review is from: Sparkling Antiqued-Style Sterling Silver Engagement or Wedding Band Ring Set Boxed with a 7mm Brilliant Round 2.2ct White Clear CZ Cubic Zirconia Size 8(Sizes 6,7,8,9) (Jewelry)
I was so excited when I received this ring in the mail, only to be disappointed when I discovered that one of the smaller stones was missing. I also think that the silver looks a little fake. I contacted the company and they told me send it back for a refund.
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Nice but...,
By
This review is from: Sparkling Antiqued-Style Sterling Silver Engagement or Wedding Band Ring Set Boxed with a 7mm Brilliant Round 2.2ct White Clear CZ Cubic Zirconia(Sizes 6,7,8,9) (Jewelry)
One of the smaller stones was missing, but it's lower down on the side and no one will notice. The stones are gogeous, and I agree, the silver does look "fake", and it's not stamped like it should be for real silver, but I'll probably just keep it.
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Loose stone,
By tamtam (Missouri) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Sparkling Antiqued-Style Sterling Silver Engagement or Wedding Band Ring Set Boxed with a 7mm Brilliant Round 2.2ct White Clear CZ Cubic Zirconia(Sizes 6,7,8,9) (Jewelry)
I fell in love with this set the minute I saw it, so I bought it immediately. I wore it for about a week and the large center stone fell out. Down the shower drain!! Needs to be faceted stronger!!! While I'm a little disapointed, the company has responded quickly and super friendly and is replacing it immediately.
4.0 out of 5 stars
Very pleased with this set,
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Sparkling Antiqued-Style Sterling Silver Engagement or Wedding Band Ring Set Boxed with a 7mm Brilliant Round 2.2ct White Clear CZ Cubic Zirconia Size 7(Sizes 6,7,8,9) (Jewelry)
This is the 3rd wedding band set I've had since I got married in 2009. The first one was rhodium - turned my finger green. The second was white-gold plated - turned my finger green. I finally decided I was going to stick with sterling silver. I found this set and fell in love immediately. I have not had any issues with it, and I've worn the set daily for over a year. All of my friends keep telling me they are jealous that I've got such a beautiful bridal set (and they all think it's loaded with diamonds, so even better!)Only downside is that it gets dirty very quickly, and take a lot of elbow grease to get the black marks off the bottom of the bands, even with regular cleaning.
4.0 out of 5 stars
Love the antique feel!!!,
By
This review is from: Sparkling Antiqued-Style Sterling Silver Engagement or Wedding Band Ring Set Boxed with a 7mm Brilliant Round 2.2ct White Clear CZ Cubic Zirconia Size 6(Sizes 6,7,8,9) (Jewelry)
This ring is a nice reproduction, at a low cost. It's rally pretty, and the way the sides are detailed, is beautiful.
5.0 out of 5 stars
I love it,
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Sparkling Antiqued-Style Sterling Silver Engagement or Wedding Band Ring Set Boxed with a 7mm Brilliant Round 2.2ct White Clear CZ Cubic Zirconia(Sizes 6,7,8,9) (Jewelry)
This ring is beutiful!!I love the antique look, and I'm crazy about silver.My fiance proposed and even though I picked out the ring my self I was still amazed on how pretty it is.I brought it to a silver Jewlery shop and He could not make it smaller because of the way its set,We ordered a 6 but my ring size is a 4.he told me if I brought it some where else then the stones would of fallen out if they tried to resized it smaller but it can be increased in size ,but He put a ring guard on it and I'm very happy with that because the ring means so much to me and my fiance.Thank you for such great sevice,and a wonderful keepsake.
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|