67 of 68 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Beyond the IPCC - a country without maps, March 1, 2007
Fred Pearce is a journalist with 'New Scientist' magazine who has been writing about climate change since the 1980s. With a background writing for a popular science magazine he is naturally skilled at quickly distilling complex science into a readable and understandable narrative for the educated lay reader and placing things in the big picture. But he is also grounded and objective, saying in the Introduction "I am a skeptical environmentalist" but that "climate change is different.. the more I learn.. the more scared I get.. because this story adds up."
Pearce goes through a checklist of major concerns scientists are looking at: Melting ice in Greenland and the Arctic. Glaciological "monsters" lurking in Pine Island Bay and Totten glacier. The stability of the West Antarctic ice sheet. El Nino getting stuck, trigger droughts or super-storms. The Amazon rain forest disappearing due to drought or fire. The acidification of the oceans. Damage to the atmospheric hydroxyl smog cleaning system. Influences of the stratosphere on global warming. Methane releases from melting arctic bogs. The North Atlantic conveyor belt shutdown. Frozen undersea methane clathrates. The impact of soot. The unknown factor of clouds. The many ways the sun and the earths orbit effects climate change. And much more.
In addition he covers a bit of history including a history of the debate between the the polar and tropical camps on what is the driver of climate change. His explanation of El Nino was simple yet it finally made sense to me how it works and why it is so important.
Interleaved throughout is the common narrative that climate is not a steady beast, but an unpredictable "drunk", who prodded a little can go off in a sudden unexpected bender. This is an excellent overview that is easy to read, fascinating, well written roller-coaster of ideas and insights.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
19 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Outstanding - Explains Climate Tipping Points, May 26, 2007
Type I climate change is gradual and follows the graphs of most climate modelers; Type II is much more abrupt and results from crossing hidden "tipping points." Pearce explains what some of these tipping points in a credible and balanced manner.
Charles Keeling began collecting CO2 data at the top of Mauna Loa (14,000 feet) in 1958 (315 ppm), 320 in 1965, 331 in 1975, and 380 now - the level is increasing at an accelerating rate. Nineteen of the twenty warmest years have occurred since 1980, and the five warmest years all since 1998. Thus, credible evidence indicates that global problem is real, and getting worse.
Skeptics claim, however, that weather balloon data do not reveal a daytime warming trend. Pearce explains this is most likely because until recently the thermometers used read too high because they were not shielded from UV rays; further, balloon night-time readings have risen during the same period. Others suggest that warming data are due to urban "heat islands" - on the other hand, the greatest increases are in the polar and oceanic areas, and the "heat island" effect are not affected by windy weather. Another possible explanation is sunspots - data from 1850 onward correlates well with temperature increases, UNTIL 1980 when sunspot activity began declining while warming continued. Finally, a review of almost 1,000 peer-reviewed papers on climate change published between 1993 and 2003 found an almost universal consensus that global warming exists.
"With Speed and Violence" then goes on to review potential tipping points. The Amazon rainforest is the largest living reservoir of CO2 on the earth's land surface - its trees contain 17 billion tons of carbon and its soil perhaps as much again. Thus, trees and soil together contain the equivalent of about 20 years' of man-made emissions from burning fossil fuels. However, an experiment found that while the forest could handle two years of drought, after that the trees began dying, falling down to rot and release CO2. After this occurred the exposed land also released about 75% of its CO2. Current climate change already risks bringing drought to a number of areas in the world. Forests have been growing faster in various areas of the world due to increased CO2, but lately this has reversed due to droughts in various areas.
At least half the world's tropical peat swamps (up to 60 feet deep) are on the Indonesian islands of Borneo, Sumatra, and West Papua. They contain perhaps 50 billion tons of carbon. Wildfires there in '97-'98 released up to 40% of all man-made emissions; these fires are not rare as farmers frequently set them to clear land. Some of the fires continue underground in the deep peat deposits.
As warming proceeds to beyond the Arctic tree line, carbon stored in thick layers of permanently frozen soil (permafrost) comprised of thousands of years' accumulation of dead lichen, moss, etc. that never rotted before freezing becomes at risk for release. The Siberian peat bog covers 400 square miles, and as it begins to thaw, the peat decomposes into swamps and lakes devoid of oxygen. The result is methane production - a gas that has a 100X greater global warming impact than CO2.
Our oceans contain about 50X the CO2 residing in the atmosphere. Water's ability to retain CO2, however, decreases with warming. And then there is the possible methane clathrates (thought to have been created by microbes decaying at the bottom of the ocean) - some scientists are concerned that global warming, combined with cracks in the ocean floor, will release enormous amounts of methane from this source.
Pearce's prognosis is that of uncertainty and new surprises. He believes that our aim must be to avoid crossing thresholds where irreversible change occurs (eg. shutting off the Gulf Stream) - especially changes that trigger further warming. He sees the Kyoto targets as small compared with the cuts that eventually will be needed.
Currently the U.S. and Australia emit about 5.5 tons of carbon/year/citizen, Europeans average about 3, China about 1, and India less than 0.5. Our top priority should be energy efficiency, followed by increased use of nuclear, solar, and wind energy. Estimated total cost to stop global warming - about $8 trillion.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
67 of 79 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Uncharted Anthropocene, May 11, 2007
Researchers in human-caused climate change have fallen into two camps. Even though all the scientists in the field have shown beyond reasonable doubt that the Earth's climate is changing, one camp believes that changes will be gradual, while the other camp is concerned about abrupt cataclysmic changes that will bring us the worst horrors of global warming all at once. In other words, climate change theorists have largely broken into the "gradualism" vs. "catastrophism" camps, not unlike their counterparts in the sciences of evolution or geology. This book presents the latest scientific advances in the catastrophist school, and Pearce writes in a very readable style about some truly startling evidence. For instance, the melting icecaps could add vast amounts of cold and fresh water to the warm and salty ocean, possibly leading to an abrupt deactivation of the crucial Gulf Stream. Such global warming-related events would not be gradual, and precise tipping points could be reached that would have sudden and very catastrophic effects around the world.
But while much of the material in this book is quite fascinating for the concerned citizen, and would probably be a shock to the politicized skeptic, there is a real problem with Pearce's presentation style. Pearce is a magazine writer, and his skill in creating short hard-hitting articles does not translate well into book form. Here, an avalanche of different scientific topics zoom by in brief chapters averaging about five pages in length, resulting in a lot of introductions but very little in-depth analysis or closure. Meanwhile, the myriad topics eventually drift into increasingly conjectural theories and historical coverage of weather-related natural disasters, all of which drift away from the main topic of human-caused climate change. Most importantly, the (inadvertent) result of this disjointed presentation style is a portrayal of climate change science as an unruly mass of infighting and contradictions, with the catastrophists arguing with each other and with the gradualists. This will not help in presenting a united front to right-wing deniers. This book is still a very useful source of solid evidence on the real phenomenon of climate change, but the catastrophist school will have to wait for a true manifesto. [~doomsdayer520~]
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
