4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Shattering Illusions, Dealing with Uncontrolled Demons, July 25, 2009
This review is from: The Spiders of Allah: Travels of an Unbeliever on the Frontline of Holy War (Paperback)
Customer review from the Amazon Vine™ Program (What's this?)
James Hider provides an unusually candid and vividly detailed memoir while working as a war correspondent for the London Times in Iraq from 2003 to 2006. There he witnessed personally and up close this surreal lawless country which has runamok. The political drama of clashing religious factions, the tragedy of suicide bombers and the aftermath, and the confusing mess with which the American, British and Australian troops dealt with is all presented to the reader. The author is an avowed athiest and being also British, his viewpoint provides some dark humor and occasional amusement even during times when his own life was at risk. He so clearly points out, even Hollywood could not have invented some of the bizarre circumstances which arose and that he witnessed while covering crucial aspects of this war. The pain and sorrow of the families whose loved ones lives were lost due to senseless bombings and street fighting is palpable and real. Families suffered tremendously while they struggled to survive against all odds. The author gives an insider view of how ordinairy people coped. He provides insights into the views of various religious factions and Iraqi rebels who fought for control over their own neighborhoods after Saddam Hussein fell from power and was executed for the crimes he committed against his own people. Both the Shia and Sunnis fought to the death for power and control. The author provides unique insights into how war correspondents and newspaper reporters obtained their leads and found material for their stories.
James Hider also writes about the Palestinian and Israeli conflicts when he was stationed in Israel and where he happened to be on September 11, 2001. He interviewed Palestinian fighters and saw how young boys belonged to a group similar to boy scouts the only major difference was they eventually trained to become suicide bombers. The author quotes a Brooklynite Jewish Israeli resident who stated on that fateful day sentiment to the effect that he was glad the USA got attacked because now they understood better what Israel faced on a regular basis. Suffice to say, this book provides a variety of viewpoints from both sides of each conflict. The author writes in a stream of consciousness style which is appropriate for the subject. His writing style is erudite, detailed and descriptive. Just a warning for the faint of heart: the author does not hold back on the blood and gore, so be prepared for this reality. This book is most highly recommended. Erika Borsos [pepper flower]
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
18 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Disappointment, but Sometimes Interesting, June 13, 2009
This review is from: The Spiders of Allah: Travels of an Unbeliever on the Frontline of Holy War (Paperback)
Customer review from the Amazon Vine™ Program (What's this?)
This book is not what is spelled out in the product description. That description had me believing, and looking forward to reading, a book that tied together the struggles in Israel, Palestine and the rest of the Middle East. In fact, the description even says that the book takes a tour of these places and that it then circles back to Jerusalem. In reality this book is 90% about living in Iraq during the aftermath of the war. Yes, there is a stint in Israel and Palestine at the beginning -- an extremely cursory overview of the conflict there -- and he does go back to Jerusalem at the end of the book for a full 15-page interview with one man with an interesting theory about the relationship between the Palestinians and Israelis (which is irrelevant to the current conflict). But mostly this is disjointed war stories.
And the rich humor that is lauded in the description and professional reviews? There are a handful of ironic observations and some notes about curious customs, but hardly any of it reads like intentional humor. Any humor is very, very dark. In the whole book only one part made me chuckle.
The book begins with Mr. Hider living in Israel and recounts some observations of various Jewish religious sects. He then manages to get an interview with a leader of a suicide bombing group in Palestine. He visits an illegal Jewish settlement and reports on the fanaticism of the inhabitants. These are two equally disturbing perspectives. He gives a lot of history, which is told in a jumbled way with some present day anecdotes thrown in, but the connection to modern day issues often seems strained. Mr. Hider focuses on the fanatics and the negative. I would have liked a more balanced story that more explicitly elucidated the merits of the opinions on each side of the issue. For example, sure, certain Palestinians are homicidal extremists, but they've got some valid arguments against Israeli policies, some of which are equally as harsh. He focusses on the effects rather than paying attention to the causes, and connections are implied at best.
Moving on to Iraq, there is a lot of time dedicated to discussing the American military and political involvement. During this part there really is very little discussion of religion. It is all about how Iraqis are surviving in the post war anarchy. He talks about traffic jams, food shortages, looting, demolished palaces and people struggling to come to terms with the torture and murder of Saddam's regime. The stories are randomly assorted with little rhyme or reason to why they are grouped together. They read like a travelogue, with no clear point in their telling, just taking us along for the journey.
Most of his time in Iraq reads like this: one day after another of unrelated events which do not combine to form any particular thesis. Some of these events and situations are very interesting to read about, simply because they are so foreign and unimaginable. Many give a richer perspective than the home front news stories of the war, and some of the stories are different than anything I'd ever heard told: stories of how people survive amid anarchy, how they cope with random violence all around them and how they pick sides to avoid being killed (not necessarily because of ideology). So some of this writing about Iraq is genuinely interesting but it doesn't support any larger premise about religion or conflict.
Sometimes Mr. Hider's objectivity is compromised. Sometimes this is due to his unwavering atheistic viewpoint, while other times it just seems to be cultural insensitivity. For instance, at one point he acquires guard dogs for his house in Iraq, but problematically the Moslem guards that he employs are vehemently against allowing dogs in the house, thinking them unclean. His solution is a brutish order to allow the dogs in the house. Given the gravity of the situation perhaps that was the only sensible thing to do. However, I guess I would expect there to have been some acknowledgement in the text of differing beliefs and the need to compromise them.
Judgmental quips about religion being nonsensical foolishness for the feeble minded are about the only sort of dialog on the topic. He never comes right out and says "You're stupid if you believe in God," but he makes some strong implications. I looked forward to reading this book partly because the author is an atheist, which I assumed erroneously would grant him an unbiased vantage point to observe the varying religions in action. Unfortunately, his staunch anti-religious beliefs don't allow him to engage in a meaningful discussion about the merits and liabilities of specific religions and their implications for cultural interactions. I expected him to be skeptical, that is, to act more as an impartial observer instead of bludgeoning the reader with vapid anti-religious sentiments. It gets a little old after a while.
Another minor, but recurring, point to make is that he will often use idiomatic terminology or foreign words without any explanation as to what they mean. For example, he states, "In his plain white dishdasheh and matching yeshmak, he loomed..." but never bothers to explain what a dishdasheh or a yeshmak are. If they are important then explain them, otherwise omit them. Another time he says "...it was a place frequented by foreigners, it sold booze and it was what was known as a 'soft target'." I guess I haven't watched enough late night CNN, but I don't know what a soft target is. There is no further context to give any clues either. Another empty statement.
This book does not live up to it's promise to evaluate the situations in the Middle East through the lens of religion. To be fair, that is a tall order that most books would struggle to live up to. What this book is, is a travelogue of a journalist visiting places that people concerned with their personal safety have sense enough to avoid. For this reason there is some interest to the stories told in the book. They are fantastical at times. It is amazing how violence can become mundane. But the disjointed nature of the tales is distracting. In a single chapter the story will jump from 2003 to 2005 and then the next chapter will start back in 2003. The discourse on religion is minimal and not very insightful. The biggest problem with the book is that it is not about the Middle East -- it is about Iraq. There is hardly any content about Israel or Palestine and nothing more than a mention of other key middle eastern countries. This book provides some details of Iraqi life from the unusual perspective of a foreign journalist who actively seeks out the most dangerous areas to report from. If you want a deeper or more spiritual viewpoint then you should look elsewhere.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No