7 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Radical Hermeneutics, September 24, 2009
This review is from: Spinoza: Theological-Political Treatise (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy) (Paperback)
Spinoza's TTP remains a crucial pre-enlightenment work of political/theological philosophy. Contrary to his foil, Moses Maimonedes, Spinoza attempts to provide a new and unprejudiced reading of the Old and New Testaments, so as to situate the work within the framework of naturalistic philosophy and to strip it of its spiritual biases. Spinoza concludes (much to the chagrin of his contemporaries) that miracles and prophecy are internally incoherent according to the rationalists' conception of God, and that much of the prior interpretations of the bible have failed to provide sufficient hermeneutical accounts of the historicity of biblical creation. The TTP is also a great work of political theory-and an immensely important the Hobbsian Social Contract. Philosophy is still attempting to catch up with the overwhelming radicalism of Spinozism, and this text is an invaluable precursor to the Ethics.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
brilliant, edgy, playful, December 20, 2009
This review is from: Spinoza: Theological-Political Treatise (Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy) (Paperback)
Spinoza wrote his Theological-Political Treatise after his Ethics as a kind of explanation, as a defense against attacks against him of heresy, as a demonstration of the philosophical principles in action which he had previously laid out in the highly theoretical Ethics, and - so it has been many times claimed - as to make his views readable to a much wider audience. The result is a highly readable, extended meditation on the history of biblical interpretation. He makes a persuasive case for the total lack of consistency among religious authorities who have laid down the law before, raising questions about their claims to having access to a true or pure understanding. In fact, his expose impresses upon the reader that every attempt at interpretation of the bible will inevitably be political. That is, no matter how well intentioned and how well informed, all attempts at interpreting the bible cannot help but be shaped by the cultural, historical, and political context of the interpretor. Of course, from the very outset of this work, Spinoza makes a concerted effort to show that all claims of prophetic authority are unfounded.
I found it particularly engaging and interesting to watch Spinoza make these incredible daring (for the time) arguments while at the same time always being careful to insist that he is a deeply religious person and that this work is -- and all his works are -- neither scandalous nor subversive. There are times when it seems like he is engaged in defensive maneuvers to save his life, and other times when his equivocal positioning seems a virtuoso act of rhetorical fencing.
This particular edition comes with Cambridge's usual high quality scholarly reference material throughout.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No