The Spiritual Brain and over 360,000 other books are available for Amazon Kindle – Amazon’s new wireless reading device. Learn more

 

or
Sign in to turn on 1-Click ordering.
 
 
Express Checkout with PayPhrase
What's this? | Create PayPhrase
Sorry!
More Buying Choices
70 used & new from $1.65

Have one to sell? Sell yours here
 
   
The Spiritual Brain: A Neuroscientist's Case for the Existence of the Soul
 
 
Start reading The Spiritual Brain on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don’t have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here.
 
  

The Spiritual Brain: A Neuroscientist's Case for the Existence of the Soul (Hardcover)

~ (Author), Denyse O'leary (Author)
Key Phrases: spiritual neuroscience, Université de Montréal, who has mystical experiences, Nonmaterialist Science, New Direction, The Carmelite Studies (more...)
3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (38 customer reviews)

List Price: $25.95
Price: $17.13 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details
You Save: $8.82 (34%)
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.

Only 4 left in stock--order soon (more on the way).

Want it delivered Tuesday, November 10? Choose One-Day Shipping at checkout. Details
33 new from $3.01 35 used from $1.65 2 collectible from $42.90

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
  Kindle Edition $9.59 -- --
  Hardcover $17.13 $3.01 $1.65
  Paperback $11.66 $8.51 $4.00
  MP3 CD, Audiobook, CD, MP3 Audio $18.99 $15.02 $9.99
  Unknown Binding $39.99 $39.99 --
  Audio, Download Offsite Link $13.12 or less with new Audible membership

Frequently Bought Together

The Spiritual Brain: A Neuroscientist's Case for the Existence of the Soul + What is Neurotheology? + How God Changes Your Brain: Breakthrough Findings from a Leading Neuroscientist
Price For All Three: $47.94

Show availability and shipping details

  • This item: The Spiritual Brain: A Neuroscientist's Case for the Existence of the Soul by Mario Beauregard

    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

  • What is Neurotheology? by Brian C. Alston

    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details

  • How God Changes Your Brain: Breakthrough Findings from a Leading Neuroscientist by Andrew Newberg M.D.

    In Stock.
    Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
    Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. Details


Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Mystical Mind (Theology and the Sciences)

Mystical Mind (Theology and the Sciences)

by Eugene D'Aquili
3.8 out of 5 stars (9)  $18.43
The "God" Part of the Brain: A Scientific Interpretation of Human Spirituality and God

The "God" Part of the Brain: A Scientific Interpretation of Human Spirituality and God

by Matthew Alper
3.8 out of 5 stars (85)  $10.17
There Is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind

There Is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind

by Antony Flew
3.9 out of 5 stars (90)  $10.54
Facing Death and Finding Hope: A Guide To The Emotional and Spiritual Care Of The Dying

Facing Death and Finding Hope: A Guide To The Emotional and Spiritual Care Of The Dying

by Christine Longaker
4.7 out of 5 stars (7)  $17.10
How God Changes Your Brain: Breakthrough Findings from a Leading Neuroscientist

How God Changes Your Brain: Breakthrough Findings from a Leading Neuroscientist

by Andrew Newberg M.D.
4.3 out of 5 stars (32)  $17.82
Explore similar items

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Following C.S. Lewis's dictum that to 'see through' all things is the same as not to see, neuroscientist Beauregard and journalist O'Leary mount a sweeping critique of a trend in the pop science media to explain away religious experience as a brain artifact, pathology or evolutionary quirk. While sympathizing with the attraction such neurotheology holds, the authors warn against the temptation to force the complex varieties of human spirituality into simplistic categories that they argue are conceptually crude, culturally biased and often empirically untested. In recently published research using Carmelite nuns as subjects, Beauregard's group at the University of Montreal found specific areas of brain activation associated with contemplative prayer. But these patterns are quite distinct from those associated with hallucinations, autosuggestion or states of intense emotional arousal, resembling instead how the brain processes real experiences. Insisting that we have never entertained the idea of proving the existence of God, the authors concede that the results of our work are assumed to be a strike either for or against God and that on the whole, we [don't] mind. Never shrinking from controversy, and sometimes deliberately provoking it, this book serves as a lively introduction to a field where neuroscience, philosophy, and secular/spiritual cultural wars are unavoidably intermingled. (Sept.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


From Booklist

*Starred Review* Neuroscientist Beauregard is no flighty New-Ager or Creationist but, he says, one of a minority of neuroscientists who don't adhere to strictly materialist interpretation of the human mind. He and his ilk believe that scientists who strive to explain the mind as an illusion created by the brain's chemical reactions ignore or vastly miscalculate the expanse of all that goes on in the universe. That is, it is too limiting to strictly confine the origin of all human thought to material or chemical interactions. In this complex tome, he describes the intricacy of his work and proposes that humans don't so much generate as transmit thoughts, and that by virtue of human ability to mentally interconnect with a higher consciousness, the actions of the mind become distinct and separate from, though observable by means of, the brain. He set out to prove his theory by studying a group of Carmelite nuns as they experienced God in prayer and meditation. Beauregard would be the first to note that, while his work doesn't ipso facto prove the existence of God, it does lend scientific credence to the existence of a higher or universal consciousness. Chavez, Donna

Product Details

  • Hardcover: 384 pages
  • Publisher: HarperOne; 1 edition (September 4, 2007)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0060858834
  • ISBN-13: 978-0060858834
  • Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6.2 x 1.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.3 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (38 customer reviews)
  • Amazon.com Sales Rank: #190,546 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Inside This Book (learn more)

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?


Tags Customers Associate with This Product

 (What's this?)
Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
 
(10)
(3)

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

 

Customer Reviews

38 Reviews
5 star:
 (19)
4 star:
 (7)
3 star:
 (2)
2 star:    (0)
1 star:
 (10)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
3.7 out of 5 stars (38 customer reviews)
 
 
 
 
Share your thoughts with other customers:
Most Helpful Customer Reviews

 
119 of 159 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Read it first, then judge, September 5, 2007
A rash of best selling books that attempt to use science to prove that materialism, such as Richard Dawkins' new book, have appeared on the market in the past few years. The Spiritual Brain: A Neuroscientist's Case for the Existence of the Soul was written by a well qualified PhD level neuroscientist at the University of Montreal who attempts by use of laboratory experimental research to evaluate the claims of the nonmaterialist account of the living world. The coauthor is a journalist, insuring that the book is readable and assessable to the general public. The team was very successful in this work, to say the least. This book is a welcome response, based on scientific research, to the claims of materialists, the theory that life and the universe contains only matter and motion and nothing more. The idea commonly espoused by materialists that no soul, no mind, and no free will exists is effectively challenged by the peer reviewed empirical research reviewed in this book. The authors document that the nonmaterialists approach to the human mind has a long and fruitful tradition and much evidence behind it even today. The authors conclude that this worldview accounts for the evidence much better than the relatively new, and currently largely stagnate, materialist worldview. The materialist tradition not only attempts to explain everything by appealing to the motion of matter only, but has now moved far beyond this, discouraging researchers from even considering the possibility that matter and the four forces explains everything, and thereby limiting research by their straight jacket which stifles science. Science must research every area that may be fruitful, as well as some areas that may not at first appear fruitful. A major conclusion of the materialists argument is that humans have no free will but, if one could understand the position and movement of the brain molecules, one could always predict the behavior of the person. Cornell professor William Provine has articulated this position very well, as has many of his students. As Oxford University Professor Richard Dawkins explains, free will is just an illusion created by the electrical charges in the neurons in our brains, nothing more. These and other highly respected scientists even question the wisdom of punishing criminals because, if there is no mind and no free will, then criminals are victims of their mechanical material brain. Does the evidence support this view? Read this book and judge for yourself. No matter which view you hold you need to at least be aware of the other side. It was my conclusion that most readers will agree that materialist blinders interfere with the freedom to follow the evidence no matter where it leads.

Comment Comments (18) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
15 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars The authors of The Spiritual Brain hit a neuroscientific nerve, February 18, 2009
By Larry Mullins "Larry Mullins" (St. Augustine, Florida) - See all my reviews
Few books stimulate so many diverse and passionate reviews as "The Spiritual Brain." I award five stars as a layperson not so much because of the scientific and philosophical arguments of the authors, but because they have dared to transcend the logic-tight barriers between the disciplines of science, religion and philosophy. They have opened doors for science that few materialistic scientists care to recognize. The stakes are very high in this discussion, as we shall see. For this is nothing less than a discussion of the nature of a human being ... is he or she simply a more evolved type of animal, or different in kind, far more than a complicated evolutionary accident? The answer to this question is critical to the course of civilization. The primary issue is whether this question can be adequately addressed by a strictly materialistic science. Many great scientific minds had their doubts.

Late in his career, Abraham Maslow, the great psychologist and founder of the "third force" movement in psychology, dared to do much the same thing as authors Mario Beauregard and Denyse O'Leary. When Dr. Maslow's book "The Psychology of Science" ventured to critique materialistic science for being too narrow in its focus, the attacks by the scientific establishment were bitter and relentless. Arthur G. Wirth, a prominent member of The John Dewey Society, mused in the Introduction to "The Psychology of Science," a predictive question: "Why would a man hurl his lance against the citadel and risks the rocks and hot oil he may expect in return?" Yet Maslow's complaint was simply that the adherents of the mechanomorphic tradition of the physical sciences were not necessarily wrong, but rather too narrow to serve as a general philosophical platform for science. Dr. Maslow was a well-trained Freudian and behaviorist. He said when he began to study the higher reaches of human nature, his training failed him. He believed that peak experiences were authentic, natural events and worthy of study. What Maslow declared were his "most important findings," the reality of metavalues (the classic triad of truth, beauty and goodness) and their power to influence and perhaps even configure human personalities, especially self-actualizing personalities. These findings were brushed aside by the broader establishment and are in danger of being lost. Yet these issues have never been resolved, and "The Spiritual Brain" helps remind us that more research and discourse are in order.

Many great minds hold that peak experiences and metavalues are not mystic fluff as some would have us believe. Abraham Maslow was a pragmatic scientist and a professed atheist. Much as William James, he believed that values and spiritual experiences should not be the exclusive domain of religionists. He advocated a science of values. He also grasped that the metavalues of truth, beauty and goodness transcend the disciplines of science, theology, and philosophy. Maslow understood that science does not have all the answers. Science can tell us much about material reality, or what is. Science can even suggest possibilities, what could be. But the poet or the religionist offers a vision for us of what ought to be. And science without values builds bigger bombs and more efficient gas chambers. Dr. Maslow fought hard to break down the barriers between the disciplines of science and religion. He wrote:

"I [have] pointed out that both orthodox science and orthodox religion have been institutionalized and frozen into a mutually excluding dichotomy. This separation into Aristotelian a and not-a has been almost perfect ... Every question, every answer, every method, every jurisdiction, every task has been assigned to either one or the other, with practically no overlaps. One consequence is that they are both pathologized, split into sickness, ripped apart into a crippled half-science and a crippled half-religion."

Philosopher Mortimer Adler also lamented the rigid divisions between the three great disciplines that lay claim to truth: science, religion and philosophy. (See his autobiography, "A Second Look in the Rearview Mirror," for the story of his struggle about this issue with crystallized academicians and his pivotal speech: "God and the Professors.") Why is this Aristotelian division between the great disciplines important? Because, though Aristotle's divisions worked well for 20 centuries, the strict paths they followed are running out of ideas in the modern world, and material science is the best example. One of the great founders of quantum mechanics, Werner Heisenberg saw this clearly. In his book, "Beyond the Frontiers," he flatly stated that quantum science had vindicated Plato, who held that concepts like truth, beauty and goodness are realities that transcend the material. Over the years the common wisdom developed that a Platonic notion was unreal, only nebulous froth. However, the legendary quantum scientist and framer of the uncertainty principle, Heisenberg, supports the concept that philosophy's classic values of truth, beauty and goodness, are realities--active agents that transcend the material.

But what of the spiritual experience? The authors of "The Spiritual Brain," Mario Beauregard and Denyse O'Leary point out that Maslow referred to the ultimate human state of consciousness as the Peak Experience. His research revealed that most people, whether they were Actualizers or not, achieved a peak experience state for brief periods. Materialistic neuroscientists claim this is an illusion. Laypersons must decide for themselves. But we are not helpless before the a priori assumptions of scientists, religionists, and philosophers. We have personal experiences that either validate one point of view or the other. Most of us have had peak experiences, and for my part, I am certain they were real. Modern psychologist and noted author Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi calls the peak experience Flow, the ultimate state of happiness. Maslow's concept of self-actualization could be likened to achieving flow more often, to living at a higher level of self-forgetfulness, creativity, and service.

Why are these issues so important? Viktor Frankl, another Freudian scientist (and survivor of Nazi death camps) explained the importance of perceiving a human being as more than a malleable "meat puppet" (in the words of the authors of "The Spiritual Brain"). In Frankl's classic, "The Doctor and the Soul" he wrote: "When we present man as an automaton of reflexes, as a mind-machine, as a bundle of instincts, as a pawn of drives and reactions, ... we feed the nihilism to which modern man is, in any case, prone. I became acquainted with the last stage of that corruption in my second concentration camp, Auschwitz. The gas chambers of Auschwitz the ultimate consequence of the theory that man is nothing but the product of heredity and environment--or, as the Nazis liked to say, "Blood and Soil." I am absolutely convinced that the gas chambers of Auschwitz, Treblinka, and Maidanek were ultimately prepared not in some ministry or other in Berlin, but rather at the desks and lecture halls of nihilistic scientists and philosophers."

The authors of "The Spiritual Brain," Mario Beauregard and Denyse O'Leary, are doing a great service with their book. For the layperson, it is a challenging read. Even so, I found it persuasive and fascinating. Ultimately this discussion is about more than scientific data. It is also the interpretation and meaning of this data that must be resolved. The religionist and the philosopher ask different questions than the scientist. We need the insights of all three in rational debate if we are to determine issues of the magnitude presented in "The Spiritual Brain." And, as I stated earlier, the stakes are high.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)



 
99 of 143 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Bad Science, Bad Theology, October 11, 2007
By kalla (Tucson, AZ United States) - See all my reviews
This book is hailed by religious believers, as it appears to support a dualistic view of the human mind. It is attacked by those who hold a purely materialistic view.

However, the reason why this book is horribly bad has nothing to do with philosophy. The book is bad because it presents misinformation, credulously accepts poor research, and occassionally bases arguments on mind-bogglingly stupid assertions (such as the claim that the nerve cell is made of 100,000 molecules on average; a statement of breathtaking ignorance; imagine someone publishing a book on human body, and starting with a claim that "an average adult human body contains approximately two ounces of bone" - how do you believe anything they say after that point?).

Again, this has nothing to do with materialism. If humans have souls, and if mind is indeed something separate from the brain, this book is still bad - its conclusion may or may not be true, but the "evidence" and "reasoning" it presents are distorted far outside the boundaries of truth.
Comment Comments (4) | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)


Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
 
 
 
Most Recent Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Neuroscience and the Soul.
_The Spiritual Brain: A Neuroscientist's Case for the Existence of the Soul_ (2007) by researchers Mario Beauregard and Denyse O'Leary provides a fascinating glimpse into the... Read more
Published 1 month ago by New Age of Barbarism

1.0 out of 5 stars Society's ignorance of what science really is: a sad example
Carl Sagan warned that the general population's ignorance of science would have extremely negative consequences for our species in the long-term. Read more
Published 3 months ago by JOSHUA SAWYERS

1.0 out of 5 stars Dissapointing. An incoherent, poorly researched and dishonest book that never delivers.
I picked up the book feeling both hopeful and excited about reading a good case from neuroscience for the existence of an immaterial "soul". Read more
Published 4 months ago by Rachael Craig

5.0 out of 5 stars A new scientific argument for the soul
For centuries philosophers and theologians have argued about the makeup of the human being. Are we material only, or do we possess also an immaterial soul? Read more
Published 6 months ago by John A. Battle

4.0 out of 5 stars A good read with much time spent criticizing materialists.
I stumbled upon this book in the Science section of my local bookstore. It looked interesting enough so I promptly purchased it and I've been working my way through it, little by... Read more
Published 8 months ago by Kenneth R. Friend II

5.0 out of 5 stars BRAVO!
Finally, a book that has the audacity to put spirituality on the same level as other worthy areas of study via the rigors of science! Read more
Published 9 months ago by Matthew J. Schimpf

5.0 out of 5 stars The answer to reductionist, materialist psychological monism
The Self and Its Brain

Dr Beauregard's work provides solid support for the view of Sir John Eccles, nobel prize winner in physiology, that the genetic characteristics... Read more
Published 11 months ago by Prof. Dr John Warwick Montgome...

1.0 out of 5 stars Not Enjoyable
This book is just too confusing and it wasn't what I thought it was going to be at all. All they are doing is arguing through the entire book about materialism, which the authors... Read more
Published 12 months ago by Erica L. Kelley

4.0 out of 5 stars Mind is not brain
The author writes a necessary book which starts out be describing limits to the current approach to neuroscience, which is based on a materialistic philosophy. Read more
Published 16 months ago by Richard Picone

5.0 out of 5 stars In defense of spirituality.
Beauregarde argues that the entire edifice of today's accepted science is based on the twin pillars of materialism and scientism. Read more
Published 17 months ago by D. Rigas

Only search this product's reviews



Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
What about the non-experiencers? 0 September 2007
First principle of religious apologetics 0 September 2007
See all 2 discussions...  
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
   



So You'd Like to...


Create a guide

Product Information from the Amapedia Community

Beta (What's this?)


Look for Similar Items by Category


Look for Similar Items by Subject

 

Feedback

If you need help or have a question for Customer Service, contact us.
 Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
Is there any other feedback you would like to provide?

Your comments can help make our site better for everyone.


Your Recent History

 (What's this?)

After viewing product detail pages or search results, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in.