10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Why Did I Finish This?, March 13, 2006
This review is from: Splintered Icon (Mass Market Paperback)
Author Jack Dubrul, who penned an endorsement on the front of this book, should be thumped for comparing this book to Dan Brown's work. The premise is interesting: a four-hundred year old journal that may lead to a long-lost holy relic. The problem is that the story drags. Do not wait for it to get better, it doesn't. Run from this one.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
8 of 8 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
"Dan Brown Fans Take Note" . . . AVOID THIS BOOK!, December 31, 2005
This review is from: Splintered Icon (Mass Market Paperback)
I just finished this book and want two weeks of my life back. The "plot" is weak and convoluted. The writing style is, dare I say, God awful. The infusion of fact, history and science is so remedial, it borders on childish.
The book starts off like a Dan Brown novel: death, intrigue and a plot sequence that makes no sense (but will be cleared up later). After that, it takes a significant turn for the lame. There are gaps in the plot so wide you could drive a team of trucks through it. The dialog between characters is unbearable. The "witty" banter between Harry and Zola is along the lines of two children having a "Yes you did", "No I didn't", "Yes you did" argument.
The key to the book is a journal written in 1585 that needs to be translated. The translation is consistent in its lack of consistency, often vacillating between old English and modern colloquial. The story being told is OK, but spends a lot of time on useless drivel, when it could be better spent filling in some of the gaps.
The ending . . . wow . . . equally terrible. In most books, there is some foundation laid for a heroic rescue by some obscure Calvary. Not this one. Nope, just out of the blue, bang these characters that were barely touched on show up at the last minute and save the day. After the fact you find out that there was a lot going on behind the scenes, but by that time it's a little late. I can understand plot twists, but give the reader a little something throughout the book. He could have just as easily had aliens drop in out of nowhere and say that they set the whole thing up. It would have been just as good (maybe better).
In summary, this was the worst thing I ever read, and I have read some garbage. I would have given it Zero Stars, but that wasn't an option. Now if you'll excuse me, I need to light a fire to properly dispose of this book . . . .
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not a good choice, March 10, 2007
I like books about ancient manuscripts, ancient relics, ancient secrets, which is both a good and a bad thing since there seems to be lots of this type of book being written now but not all are good, like this one. It seems as if the author was ordered to chop down a much longer book but refused to alter the plot; therefore, what's left are very shallow and unsympathetic characters, strange relationships that are never properly developed and overly long lectures that I didn't care enough about to make any sense out of. The most aggravating part is the core of the plot -- that the icon is real. I found no convincing proof, but the protagonist is willing to risk life and limb for it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No