| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Has some utility, but not a significant work,
By
This review is from: Spooked: Espionage In Corporate America (Hardcover)
I don't know why this short text is in hardcover, and as mentioned in the other reviews, it is more than a bit disjointed, and suffers from some flaws in research. On the positive side, Chapters 4 & 5 are a useful description of social engineering, that can help the reader better understand how vulnerable an organization is to simple information gathering techniques. It is difficult to find material on the subject of 'Information Brokers', so this book provides a useful source on that subject, although no specific topic is covered in depth. I found Fialka's book, "War By Other Means," a more informative and interesting read. Fialka's book doesn't discuss the Avery case which comprises the greater part of "Spooked," so the books are somewhat complementary if you are looking for additional examples of industrial espionage. "Spooked" is a quick read, and outside of some structural weaknesses in its organization, it is an enjoyable enough text. It is more of a 'popular' approach to this subject, aimed at the casual reader who is more interested in titillation than in substance.
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Big on Headlines, Weak on Details, and Poorly Written,
By Donald Mitchell "Jesus Loves You!" (Thanks for Providing My Reviews over 109,000 Helpful Votes Globally) - See all my reviews (VINE VOICE) (HALL OF FAME REVIEWER) (TOP 100 REVIEWER)
This review is from: Spooked: Espionage In Corporate America (Hardcover)
If you ran into two guys in a bar and you all had had a few alcoholic beverages, you might hear war stories about how they had turned up people doing unseemly things. It would be fun. Take the same two guys, and have them write down a few strung-together stories in a book with little substance and style. When you read the results in the sober light of day, it's not very good. That's the feeling I got here. Mr. Penenberg is a business investigative journalist. As such, he knows how to dangle a promise. The trouble is, he doesn't seem to have the material to support his promise. The few stories about corporate intelligence gathering in this book are uninspiring in the extreme. Anyone who has worked in a company for a few months could tell better stories than these. Mr. Barry is an intelligence gathering practitioner, and he provides one interesting, cogent account of finding out about better ways to make frozen pizza crusts. It was the only story in the book that moved smoothly from promise to fulfilling the promise. The rest just seemed to ramble. The bulk of the book is about the case of a Taiwanese company caught in an FBI sting taking confidential Avery Dennison "trade secrets" from an Avery Dennison employee. You first learn how the employee came to steal from Avery Dennison. Then you find out how his employer caught on. Next, the book describes how the employee was hung out to dry so he could be bait for his illegal employer, the Taiwanese company. Following that you get the videotaped sting. The rest involves legal maneuverings through a criminal and civil law suit, the other suits filed by the Taiwanese company, and how the two companies competed with each other while this was going on. You are intended to end up disgusted with everyone, and you probably will be. A good editor could have reduced this material by over half and improved it a lot. The book constantly slams individuals and firms who perform corporate intelligence gathering, accusing them of not abiding by ethical standards. In other cases, those described look silly because they or their clients don't do well in the marketplace anyway. The book ends up describing what happened to each person in the book. With one or two exceptions, being in corporate intelligence didn't seem to pay off very well. To give you an example of the weakness about details in the book, let me describe the material about commercial spying by France. This has been alleged in the press for as long as I can remember. Magazines constantly warn you not to take laptops to France, because maids may download your files. In a book like this that makes many references to commercial spying by the French government, I expected lots of great stories that I had not heard before. I didn't find them. There were just a few allegations about who might have stolen what from whom. One thing is clear. There are people out there who like to misrepresent themselves and try to steal intellectual property and information that doesn't belong to them. And it doesn't look like it's too hard to do. Be prepared to defend yourself. This book won't tell you how to do that, though. You'll have to look elsewhere. My advice is to skip this book. After you finish reading this review, I suggest that you think about what information your organization has that would be reduced in value if held in the wrong hands. How can you change the information you develop and keep so that it will become more valuable as more people touch it, either legally or illicitly? How can you learn to move so quickly and surely that it doesn't matter what competitors know? Expand knowledge in constructive ways!
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
A poor attempt at explaining intelligence work.,
By Thomas Waters Jr. (Tampa, FL USA) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Spooked: Espionage In Corporate America (Hardcover)
One of the poorest reference works on intelligence I have read. As a competitive intelligence professional I found Penenberg and Barry's insight irregular at best. There is little revealed here not already in the public domain. The text outside the Avery Dennison case skips around randomly from topic to topic with poor transition points. Leaping casually from intelligence to espionage and back again, with no concern for their clear separation, the book appears as a random collection of thoughts, memories, and speculations. For whatever reason, the authors go out of their way to malign several people, accusing them of any number of wrong doings. Apparently Mr. Barry can see beyond the splinter in his own eye, boasting of several ill-advised collection methods that clearly violate any reasonable business ethics, a pot taunting the kettles. I previously worked in the research laboratory of one of the world's largest chemical companies and was conducting research on polymer-based adhesives for (our customer) Avery Dennison when the espionage occurred. I have followed the case in the press, pleased that a company of their size was not willing to simply roll over and sweep the incident under the rug. Along with some of my former colleagues I had championed their case within my firm, and upon learning of the book's pending release, had anticipated learning more about it. But the author's overstatements far exceed their output. The book is short, less than 200 hundred pages, with no follow on references for further study. The Avery Dennison case is worthy of careful analysis, as it could have far reaching application in global business practices. But this book fails to even approach such a level. The result is some light-weight dinner conversation, an article that grew too big, by a couple of authors who perhaps are not as qualified to speak on the subject as they would like to be.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product).
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|