Buy New
$18.37
Qty:1
  • List Price: $19.95
  • Save: $1.58 (8%)
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Only 3 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Trade in your item
Get a $2.00
Gift Card.
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

States' Rights and the Union: Imperium in Imperio, 1776-1876 (American Political Thought (University Press of Kansas)) Paperback – October 24, 2000


Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback, October 24, 2000
"Please retry"
$18.37
$13.26 $13.25


Frequently Bought Together

States' Rights and the Union: Imperium in Imperio, 1776-1876 (American Political Thought (University Press of Kansas)) + Liberty and Freedom: A Visual History of America's Founding Ideas (America: a Cultural History) + A History of Money and Banking in the United States: The Colonial Era to World War II
Price for all three: $93.17

Buy the selected items together

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Best Books of the Month
Best Books of the Month
Want to know our Editors' picks for the best books of the month? Browse Best Books of the Month, featuring our favorite new books in more than a dozen categories.

Product Details

  • Series: American Political Thought (University Press of Kansas)
  • Paperback: 304 pages
  • Publisher: University Press of Kansas; Reprint edition (October 24, 2000)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0700612270
  • ISBN-13: 978-0700612277
  • Product Dimensions: 5.5 x 0.6 x 8.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 12.8 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #286,732 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

Review

"A bold, independent thinker, McDonald provides an indispensable history, replete with wise assessments." -- Eugene D. Genovese in Atlantic Monthly

"A book on states’ rights should include power struggles, authority issues, and great debates, and this book does not disappoint." -- Southern Historian

"A masterful book by one of America’s premier historians." -- North Carolina Historical Review

"A trenchant exploration of the issues and events defining the tension between national authority and the doctrine of states’ rights." -- Choice

"One could ask for no better introduction into this important and often complicated history." -- Times Literary Supplement

From the Back Cover

"Vintage McDonald. A provocative book written with force, verve, and distinction."--Herman J. Belz, author of The American Constitution: Its Origins and Development

Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
3
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
1
See all 4 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

12 of 13 people found the following review helpful By R. Setliff on July 31, 2004
~States' Rights and the Union: Imperium in Imperio, 1776-1876~ is perhaps one of the best new contributions to the study of American constitutional history in recent years. Most history books portray the nature of sovereignty within the American body politic as being well-settled after 1787. In their mind, it was settled that the U.S. was to have a strong central government. This is reductionism at its best and history at its worst. The essence of a true federal regime has always been a diffusion of powers and a dual sovereignty, not a centralized unitary polity like France or the United Kingdom. The framers of the Constitution deliberatedly contemplated a general government with expressly enumerated powers. The contest over States Rights and the Union was almost inevitable, as the American polity was framed with an ingrained contradiction of dual sovereignty that was anathema to European conceptions of sovereignty. McDonald's book is fittingly subtitled Imperium in Imperio, which literally delineates supreme sovereignty within supreme sovereignty. Likewise, the Calvinist notion of man's innate depravity was more readily acceptable to framers who were weary and mistrustful of concentrated power. It was the springboard for fortifying Anglo-American traditions of bicameral legislatures, common law protections for the individual and adding more checks and balances. The framers rejected whimsical views about man's good nature espoused by Rousseau. "Free government is founded in jealousy," avowed Thomas Jefferson, "and not in confidence. It is jealousy and not confidence which prescribes limited constitutions, to bind down those whom we are obliged to trust with power...Read more ›
5 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Verified Purchase
This textbook arrived in a good amount of time! Was in great condition. It was a good resource for my American Republic college course.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
4 of 7 people found the following review helpful By Jason Carter on February 4, 2009
Talk "states' rights" in today's political climate, and you're likely to be labeled a crank or a racist... or both, because so much ignorance passes for history in our government school system.

You *will* be taught in your history classes about "checks and balances" in the US Constitution, but you will be taught that those checks and balances consist largely of the division of power between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the federal government. Only a moment's reflection, though, will reveal that those branches are still all part of the same government. McDonald demonstrates conclusively that the founding fathers viewed another check and balance as critical to the limitation on growth in federal power -- states' rights. The states, as distinct sovereignties, *delegated* certain powers to the federal government and retained all other powers to themselves (c.f., 10th Amendment).

This book ends its study in 1876, the end of Reconstruction, when the Second Founding became complete -- a founding destitute of any vestige of states' rights, in which federal power would be free to grow unchecked.

Outstanding summary of key issues in American constitutionalism.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 32 people found the following review helpful By M. Geary on March 12, 2010
Personally, I didn't care for this book one bit. Yes, it is very very researched and detailed. That I will not argue. But it is not easily comprehenable and it makes me think of people who use big words and odd turns of phrase to sound smarter. I found many of the details to be inconsequential to the subject matter and some sections required outside research and re-reading to even understand.

As an aspiring college history professor, I will definately not recommend this book to my students or use any of it in my lectures/reading.
3 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again