38 of 40 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
A strong start, but ultimately disappointing., February 21, 1998
By A Customer
Bawer's book starts out brilliantly and had me tentatively recommending it to people by the end of the first chapter. He makes some very insightful points, and he has the enviable ability to create a sound bite that actually has deep meaning; there were several points in the book where he sums up complex spiritual issues in one terrific sentence. Unfortunately, the book does not live up to the promise shown at the beginning.
The points Bawer brings up about Fundamentalist Christianity are all valid, but his support for many of them is rather weak. He does not use footnotes, his references are incomplete, and the bibliography adheres to no style I've ever seen. This wouldn't matter if I wanted to accept his work as truth in and of itself, but I prefer to check sources.
Bawer also tends to express opinion as fact. He twice makes the claim that legalist Christians (his term for Fundamentalist Christians) know their doctrines are untrue, although they will never admit it to themselves. To make such a claim is arrogant and uninformed-Bawer does not know the true feelings of individual legalist Christians. I know several people who fit Bawer's definition of legalists, and they hold their beliefs more dear than anything else, including things most people cherish such as family and career. If scientific or empirical evidence refutes these beliefs, the evidence is wrong, and the people who bring this evidence against Christianity are deceived. One could easily and truthfully say legalists are just putting their heads in the sand, but that doesn't mean they do not believe their doctrine.
Bawer also rails against Pat Robertson, his editors, and his readers for not checking facts or having any knowledge about the subjects of his writing. The one incident Bawer uses as an example is a reference to Marie-Henri Beyle in Robertson's book "The New Millennium." Robertson states that Beyle is the birth name of Voltaire, but Bawer points out that it's actually the birth name of Stendhal. Robertson is therefore a distorter of history, and since no one caught the mistake four years later when the book was reprinted, his readers are unlearned and manipulable. I showed this Beyle error to three of my friends. Between us we have five graduate degrees, including three Ph.D.s. None of us knew Voltaire's birth name. It seems unlikely that this one sentence in Robertson's book (which is very badly written and full of bizarre claims) implies malleability or a lack of education. If it does, Bawer should check page 112 of "Stealing Jesus" where he confuses Lao-Tse, the founder of Taoism, with Confucius.
Overall this is a disappointing book, perhaps because I expected more actual research and less opinion, especially when discussing leaders of the Religious Right. The sketchy, sometimes incomplete supporting evidence for Bawer's statements coupled with the lack of references make me question the overall accuracy of the book. A far better look at the evil aspects of Fundamentalist Christianity is Tom Sine's "Cease Fire," though he tends to get preachy near the end.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
79 of 93 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
If you're a fundamentalist Christian you won't like it, May 27, 2001
This review is from: Stealing Jesus: How Fundamentalism Betrays Christianity (Paperback)
I enjoyed this book very much. I happen to agree with the basic premises Bawer introduces, although at times his frustration is a little too evident. It is not as much of a scholarly work as "A Place at the Table", but Bawer does include many quotes and anecdotes which add considerable weight to his assertions. I found Bawer's splitting Christians into two camps, "Legalistic" and "Non-Legalistic" a bit too simplistic (he admits this), but it is useful to make his point. His point is, in my opinion, that in pursuing a legalistic or fundamentalist approach to the Bible, legalistic Christians are missing the biggest Christian teaching of all: love. If you are sympathetic to Bawer's views, you will probably agree with much of the book. If you are a fundamentalist/legalistic Christian, this book will probably be added to your list of "banned" books, and you won't enjoy reading it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
34 of 38 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Winning Jesus Back, October 20, 2001
By A Customer
This review is from: Stealing Jesus: How Fundamentalism Betrays Christianity (Paperback)
I was oohing and ah-ing in understanding and agreement through many parts of this book. Bruce Bawer describes the fundamental or legalistic Christianity that many Americans think we have to follow or we're not Christians at all. It is the Christianity that has stolen Jesus from the rest of us who, because we think that the only true requirement of God is to love God and humankind in thought as well as action, must give up on Jesus who is represented today as narrow and condemning. Bruce Bawyer makes us realize we can still call ourselves a Christian even if we don't go along with the harsh doctrines of the media-acknowledged Christian Coalition style of Christianity. There are times when Bawyer's bitterness towards legalistic Christianity is evident, yet his message is extremely important for making us think about what it really means to be a Christian, and for encouraging those of us who believe in a church of love to speak up and not be intimidated by aggressive and judgmental button-holers.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No