Customer Reviews

The Stewardesses 3D: 40th Anniversary Deluxe Edition

5 star:		(2)
4 star:		(3)
3 star:		(1)
2 star:		(2)
1 star:		(1)

 

 

I thought that the 3-D worked quite well, given the limits of DVD. The disc provides three different versions of the film: color 3-D, black-and-white 3-D, and a really good color print in 2-D. There are also interviews with cast and crew members, and a nice documentary about 3-D that even provides a 3-D trailer preview of THE MAZE!

The film itself is a typical softcore flick from the late 1960s. Some of the actresses include Christina Hart (who is interviewed in the accompanying featurette), cult fave Monica Gayle, and Nancy "CINDY AND DONNA" Ison. THE STEWARDESSES was perhaps the first American film of its kind that played mainstream theaters. Because of that, I consider it to be the first film in the "porno chic" movement, although many film historians award that distinction to DEEP THROAT (1972).

I had a girlfriend that booked movies in San Francisco, and I got to see this movie when it first came out. The 3D was amazing for 1969!! However, when I got the movie - with the red and blue glasses - one of the early scenes where legs go flying past your head was just not the same. The original movie used Polaroid glasses, like Disneylands Michael Jackson movie. So the 3D is just so so, and the plot is fair. Lots of female nudity, so not for the young ones.

Back in the 80's a theatre in nyc had a 3d film festival that showed 3d movies from the 1950's to the 1960's. I was lucky enough to see The Stewardesses. What I remember most was that the audience was screaming with laughter at this movie. This movie is the perfect talk back to the screen movie. This is a cheesy soft porn skin flick in 3d, and I loved every minute. I just got the dvd yesterday and watched it again for the first time in years, and it has not changed a bit. I remember the scene the audience went wild over. It was right at the beginning when this girl and guy are making love in a motel room, and the girls feet and legs are going back and forth at the screen. Restoration is good. 3D is fair. It works well in somes parts, but not in others. Take this movie for exactly what it is, a look back at the very early stages of what would become the golden age of porn. This movie can be very sexy.

Wasn't around when this came out but glad I am here to see the new release. This was honestly a horrible film but being that most of the scenes were ad-libbed was honestly funny. Verry funny indeed. It just works. The 3-d in anagliph doesn't work very well but for depth-of-field works. Out of screen effects don't really work but are noticed. Still, for a bad movie, this one is just a ride at the funpark you have to take. Bad but good in every sense.

I bought this because I saw the original MANY years ago. Nostalgia! Truly a "soft porn" movie. The trip was good but the 3D was weak. At the price thogh, I'd buy again.

I understand this was a cult film, but it still lacked anything for me. The 3-D glasses were a pain to deal with and did not give me a 3-D effect at all.

AN EXCELLENT ADULT FILM OF THE 70'S.
AN EXAMPLE OF A BYGONE ERA NEVER BEFORE SEEN,
AND WE MAY NEVER SEE ANYTHING LIKE IT AGAIN.
WHEN ADULT FILMS WERE GOING MAINSTREAM.
AND THE PUSSYCAT THEATER WAS ALL THE RAGE.
THIS FILM HAS PEOPLE HAVING SEX WITH CLOTHES ON, THE DEAN MARTIN ORGY LOUNGE, STEWARDESSES JUST SITTING ABOUT NUDE DOING DAILY CHORES. A BIZZARE HALLUCINAGENIC SCENE WITH A GREEK STATUE, AND A REALLY WEIRD INEXPLICABLE SCENE AT THE END. THIS FILM IS A REAL TRIP !

The lesbian scene between stewardesses Jo and Kathy was incredibly hot, and the high-point of this film, which I think has aged incredibly well four decades after its initial release!

Modern-day girl/girl scenes could learn a lot from watching this one! Instead of simply showing two women going at it for no reason, this one includes an actual seduction, with lesbian Jo actually seducing her tipsy, beautiful, non-lesbian friend! It was an incredibly hot girl/girl encounter! Highly recommended!

how anyone can call this campy and fun, or some piece of nostalgia amazes me. yes, i remember when it came out. so what. it's terrible no matter what decade or edition it's presented in. i've never seen so many clearly uncomfortable actors/actresses in one movie before. i know it's not suppose to be erotic and boy, it certainly isn't. that's not even an issue. the "trippy" scene where one plays with this lamp bust is incredibly embarrassing, not only to the actress but to the viewers as well. it's amazing how well thought about in commentary and reviews are. i guess if you yearn for "simpler times" this might appeal to you. i guess i don't know what type of person likes crap like this, but clearly there are some that do. to each their own. you've been warned. that's all i'm gonna say.