=====
UPDATE #2
This update is being written six months after my original review, but given that I have changed my star rating, I am putting this update at the front of my review so it makes sense! I hope this information will be helpful to anyone looking to buy a nice stroller.
After 6 months of use and much deliberation, I returned the Stokke. (Amazon actually took it back after all this time!) The paint had started to chip off after only a few months and it looked horrific (see photos). I just couldn't stomach having paid soooo much for it and having it look crappy so quickly. I bought a 2012 Uppababy Vista to replace it, and my Uppababy makes me even more glad I returned the Stokke.
The intelligent engineering of the Uppababy makes things that were annoying with the Stokke but that I just dealt with look utterly ridiculous.
Folding: the Stokke folds into 8,000 pieces (okay, four - the chassis, the seat, the foot rest, and the bumper bar) and is still so huge that it takes up the entire back of my SUV. The Uppa baby folds compactly in one piece, has a standing fold, and I don't know how I ever did without it.
Textile Material: The material on the Uppababy is beautiful as well. It is a thick, durable-feeling material, unlike Stokke's, which is nice but feels like it would rip or snag very easily.
Canopy: Both have UPF50 canopies but the Uppababy has a HUGE canopy extender, about double the size of Stokke's. Plus Stokke's canopy extender is hard, like a bendable plastic, so it was getting warped out of shape with creases from continued use, and it only allowed the canopy to retract as far back as this ~4" ridge of plastic. Uppababy's is made of the same silverish UPF50 material that lines the rest of the canopy, with boning at only the front, so when you tuck it back and retract the canopy it lines up with the boning on the canopy.
Foot Rest: I thought I liked the idea of Stokke's foot rest that extends in and out and is not connected to the seat. However, that meant that when I placed my baby in the seat in the upright position, he was precariously balanced on the edge of a ~6" ledge (or narrower if you have the infant insert in) until I strapped him in while holding him in place with one hand as he reached forward to grab things. In the Uppababy, I am actually placing him IN the stroller, as the foot rest is connected and has a 180 degree range of motion. With the foot rest up (parallel to the ground) he can safely lean forward, grab his feet, grab at me, and throw his weight forward with no risk of falling out while I strap him in.
Bumper Bar: Stokke's bumper bar was detachable, but not a swing away, which meant that every time I took him out of the stroller and put him in the carseat, I had to find a spot to put it - in the back seat, on the roof, on the ground - it was a pain.
The swing away on the uppababyis sooo much easier!
Diaper Bags: The Stokke doesn't accommodate any other diaper bag but its own to attach to the stroller. I tried the Stokke bag it for one day and it was horrible. There aren'y enough compartments, and you need to fully zip and unzip the bag to use it as the shape of the zipper around the bag means items would fall out if you didn't zip it every time. Who has time to do that when you need to grab a spit up cloth, or toy, or water bottle, or whatever quickly and often one-handed?? Plus if you had the seat position in anything burt the highest the bag would drag on the ground when attached to the Stokke. So I promptly returned the Stokke diaper bag and went back to my cheap but amazing Skip Hop Versa. But, with the Stokke, I had to wear this bag on m shoulder everywhere, which got really heavy.
On the Uppababy, my diaper bag attaches to the handle bars or sits in the basket.
Basket: With the Stokke, I was already carrying my diaper bag and then had to carry shopping bags in addition. I looked like a pack mule with a fancy stroller. The bag thing on the front was pretty much ran out of space with the rain cover, mosquito netting, and one stuffed animal. It could never fit a shopping bag containing shoes or several articles of clothing. Plus, stopping, walking around to the front of the stroller, and unzipping the bag was much more trouble than it was worth. Now imagine holding shopping bags and a diaper bag and needing to change a diaper in a public restroom where there are no hooks nearby....yeah.
On the Uppababy, the basket is HUGE and accessible from all sides!!!! I'm obsessed. It's so nice to go shopping and have my hands free to tend to my baby! The basket can hold all sorts of essentials for a day trip where we'd be walking away from the car (around the city, a fair, zoo or amusement park for example) that a diaper bag alone cannot - a heavy blanket, meals and snacks, sweatshirts, toys etc.
Multiple Children: The Uppababy accommodates not only a rider board as the Stokke does, but also a rumble seat, which the Stokke does not. That way I have the flexibility to know that if I have subsequent children more closely spaced, they can both ride in the stroller.
Accessories: The Stokke accessories are so expensive that it's kind of funny. I wanted to buy a foot muff for the winter so I can go for walks in the chilly weather and Stokke charges about $300 for their foot muff, which is included in their winter kit. That's nuts in my opinion. And there are no other options for a muff to fit the Stokke, as the design is so unique.
Uppababy charges $60 for their foot muff. Much better! They also have really cool accessories, like they make a stand to hold the bassinet for home/overnight use, and then sell a laundry component to turn the stand into a laundry basket when the bassinet is no longer being used. Now that's smart!
Engineering & Construction: The Stokke is unique, but the design seems to lack common sense. So much of the Uppababy just makes sense and is easy to use. Plus, the Stokke was made out of "automobile-grade polymer," but let's call a spade a spade: it's $1,000 for plastic. And it's not even dye cast plastic; it's painted! Cheapo cheapo cheap. Gracos are made out of plastic. Even before the painted finish started to chip off like crazy (see photos), I found myself turning my head to strollers with aluminum frames (like the Bugaboo, Quinny, Bumbleride, Peg Perego, and Uppababy). They just look so much nicer, and they are so much more sturdy and durable.
The Uppababy has an aluminum frame that looks beautiful and durable.
Company: Customer service and company values matter to me. Before purchasing my Stokke, the company took over a week to respond to my inquiries. They also were unhelpful and then unresponsive when the paint started to chip off making the stroller look horrible.
Uppababy responded within 15 minutes too all of my inquiries when I was researching the stroller prior to purchasing it. 15 minutes!! I've read that they're great about honoring the warrantee as well. In addition, they're an eco-conscious company. For example, the bassinet carrying case is made from recycled product.
====
ORIGINAL REVIEW
As another reviewer said: I want to marry this stroller and have its babies!!
I am not the $1,000 stroller type of person. I mean, I want the best of everything for my baby and I am really serious about quality, but who the heck in their right mind pays $1,000 for a STROLLER? So I mean this wholeheartedly and truly when I say, this is seriously seriously worth every single penny for the NEW one. If you're reading this review and thinking about looking for a used one, DON'T! I mean it! Just buy the new one! Here's why.
Back before I even knew the baby's sex I was researching strollers and fell head over heels for the Stokke concept. I'm big into attachment parenting and natural birth and all that, so I love the idea of a stroller that facilitates a bond between parent and baby as well as encouraging baby's interaction with the world. It's not just a marketing point; it's true that with baby so much higher, he can engage so much more in his surroundings, maintain eye contact with parents and be "part of" conversations going on around him.
I initially considered looking for a used one since for the most part, the hardware functions the same and it's the same concept. But while the old ones still have the same concept, but there are some flaws. The new ones are literally PERFECT. In 2010 Stokke did a total makeover on the strollers and the new ones blow the old ones out of the water. Here is a comparison of the pre-2010 model vs. the post-2010 model. (It might not be comprehensive, but it's things that made the difference for me.)
Old: On some older models there's a problem with the seat dropping down the chassis. I've seen it. It's not pretty. The problem can range from shimmying down as you go over bumps, to outright collapsing down immediately under the weight of the child. Stokke does offer a fix for this but it's a metal pin that immobilizes the seat height entirely, so you can't take advantage of one of the signature features of adjustable seat height.
New: The part that holds the seat in position is really firm and secure. Plus it's supported by a 3 year warrantee (but I haven't read of anyone having that problem with the new model).
Old: Removing the foot rest on the old ones requires you to turn nobs on both sides of the footrest while pulling it down (basically you need three hands).
New: The new ones have one lever on the bottom portion of the footrest so you can do it one handed.
Old: The old seat is quite heavy.
New: I believe the new seat is roomier (don't quote me on that one though), and it's much more lightweight.
Read more ›