15 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Wild factual inaccuracies, December 17, 2008
This review is from: The Story of V: A Natural History of Female Sexuality (Hardcover)
In The Story of V: A Natural History of Female Sexuality, Catherine Blackledge entitles her final chapter, "The Function of the Orgasm," an obvious nod towards Wilhelm Reich, whose most famous book has that title. And in keeping with the title of the chapter, Blackledge does discuss Reich's ideas, but the discussion is riddled through with inaccuracies, one of which is totally scandalous.
First, Blackledge refers to Reich's book, The Function of the Orgasm, as having been published in 1927. The full citation in her end-notes to this chapter is "Reich, Wilhelm (1927), The Function of the Orgasm-sex-economic problems of biological energy, London: Souvenir Press, 1983" (p. 307 of the Rutgers University Press edition). While Reich did publish a book entitled Die Funktion des Orgasmus in 1927, the book that your author cites is a very different one, having very little in common with the 1927 text. The Souvenir Press edition of 1983 is a translation of a book written by Reich in 1940 and originally published in English in 1942.
One wonders how Blackledge could have possibly read the book in question, and have come away thinking it had been written in 1927. Even a casual perusal of the text makes it completely clear that the book was written much later, with references to Hitler and his rise to power in 1933, references to Reich's other writings, like Die Bione, published in 1938, and Reich's discussion of orgone energy, which he didn't claim to discover until 1939. Indeed, the passage she quotes is from the "General Survey" that precedes the text and is clearly dated 1940. Did she read past page seven, where this passage occurs?
Misdating a book is minor and understandable, in one sense, since Reich did write a book in 1927 entitled Die Funktion des Orgasmus. But what follows the reference to this text is absolutely outrageous.
I quote Blackledge:
"Reich's views of the importance of sexual pleasure were not shared by everyone, perhaps because of his controversial exhortations to f*** freely. A propaganda film he made in his youth, Mysteries of the Organism, promoting what he called orgasmatherapy, declares:
The human being averages 4,000 orgasms in a lifetime. Do not turn off this pulsating motor of joy and life force... The biological charge and discharge produced by the genital embrace causes the orgasmic reflex, supremely pleasurable muscle contractions. Subjection to social disciplines may cause gastric ulcers, respiratory, coronary and vascular diseases. Comrade lovers, for your health's sake: f*** freely" (p. 264).
What Blackledge is referring to is a film entitled, WR: Mysteries of the Organism, made by Dusan Makavejev in 1971, long after Reich's death. While the film does include some footage from Reich's early days, no one who has seen the film could possibly think that it was made by Reich himself. Indeed, the film begins with the words, "This film is in part a personal response to the life and teachings of Dr. Wilhelm Reich (1897-1957)." Just as there is evidence that Blackledge didn't read the Function of the Orgasm, I also think it rather obvious that she didn't watch Makavejev's film. Like all too many young scholars these days, she was probably relying on some third source.
Reich never called his therapy "orgasmatherapy," though that term does occur in the film. It is said by the lead character, Milena. The passage quoted above that begins "The human being averages 4,000 orgasms in a lifetime..." nowhere occurs in Reich's writings but was written by Makavejev, piecing together fragments of things Reich did in fact say. Nor did Reich ever advocate that one should "f*** freely." This too is Makavejev. Indeed, Reich contrasts what he refers to as the "genital embrace" with f***ing. From Reich's The Murder of Christ:
"The longing for the fusion with another organism in the genital embrace is just as strong in the armored organism as it is in the unarmored one. It will most of the time be even stronger, since the full satisfaction is blocked. Where Life simply loves, armored life "f***s." Where Life functions freely in its love relations... so Life also lets its love relationships grow slowly from a first comprehensive glance to the fullest yielding during the quivering embrace. Life does not rush toward the embrace. It is in no hurry... Armored man, on the other hand, confined in his organismic prison, rushes at the f***"
The Murder of Christ (p. 26).
What is truly sad about all this is that many people's only contact with Reich is through Majavejev's film, and those of us who have studied Reich's work seriously are appalled by this film and its distortions. That the film should be attributed to Reich himself is beyond the pale. And this is not some academic quibble: I remind you that Reich died in prison, due to the gross misunderstandings of his work. Blackledge's totally inaccurate treatment of his ideas and work only contributes more to such misunderstanding.
Sincerely,
Philip W. Bennett, PhD
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
V good, July 7, 2008
This review is from: The Story of V: A Natural History of Female Sexuality (Hardcover)
I bought this book because of a lifelong interest in the subject, but I did not expect it to be as good as it was. I thought it would be full of tiresome feminism like "The Vagina Monologues" but how wrong I was.
The book is fascinating and I defy anyone, male or female, to read it and not learn something, whether it's about the hyena with its enormous clitoris or the human being with her enormous clitoris (it's bigger than you ever thought!)
It's sad that I bought this in a remaindered bookshop. I don't remember it being in a real bookshop or pushed on Amazon. I suppose the subject is taboo even today.
And don't get confused by the title. It doesn't tell you much about sexuality, just the V, although sometimes she uses a more earthy word.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
