|
|
9 Reviews
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Doesn't work,
By Ari S (Philadelphia) - See all my reviews
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
I used StriVectin for about 3 mos for a stretch mark caused by prednisone. I didn't notice any change whatsoever. Some of the reviews above look they were written by people selling competitor products, so I would not take them very seriously either. Overall, StrVectin didn't do anything for me. Save your money -- by the way, at the suggestion of my dermatologist I used something called Activor Stretch Mark Erasor and my marks faded considerably, they aren't gone and it's not perfect but it worked a lot better then StriVectin. Just my 2 cents, hope this helps.
11 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
I wanted so much for this to work...,
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
A complete waste of money. I still have all my stretch marks
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
It worked for me,
By
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
Maybe it didn't work for others, but it certainly helped the furrows between my brows. It's , of course, not as good as Botox, but it helped soften the furrows at least by 50% I'd say and I paid $140. It lasted over 2 years since I only used it on the furrows. So I'd say it's worth this price. You do have to use it a while before you see results.
5 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
hype,
By
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
hype hype hype. all hype. the only thing that topical creams CAN do is moisturize. You can get very good moisturizers at drugstores, and need not spend 60-100 dollars for them.i'm sorry to tell all you folks out there hoping for miracle wrinkle cures that your ONLY options to get rid of those lines are 1. don't get any in the first place and 2. cosmetic surgery. prevention is best cure. for all you folks who don't have huge wrinkles yet, AVOID prolonged sun exposure, drink lots of water and eat lots of fruits and vegetables. living healthy is your best fight against aging, not shedding cash on "miracle" creams.
2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
worse product ever,
By
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
I was very dissappointed in this product , I wrote a review and got prompt attention a call saying i would recieve a refund if i took my review off . i did that . never recieved my refund. will never purchase from this company again. although i will use Amazon again.
1.0 out of 5 stars
Waste of Money,
By Tom S "Tom S" (Florida) - See all my reviews
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
I tried StriVectin, think I paid over 100.00 for a tube of it. I was using it to help diminish wrinkles and keep my face looking some what youthful. It did nothing, except make my bank account smaller. I have started using Retin A - it is awesome. I have noticed a big difference in my face having an even tone, smoothing, smaller pores. In my opinion, there is nothing better than Retin A. Don't buy the over the counter versions.. that is a waste of money.. get the prescription kind. I use .05% and .01%
2.0 out of 5 stars
Did nothing for me,
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
This did absolute nothing for me. It did not reduce my stretch marks at all. Didn't make them worse either! But I would not recommend it as I think it's a waste of money, unfortunately..
4 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
This is good, but Derma Step is still the best!,
By
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
I had tried all kinds of skin care systems, with different levels of success, but in the end, the Derma Step system works the best, with long lasting results. You can get a free trial and see for yourself here: awesomestufffree.com/dermastep
1 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
it is necesarry for all women,
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
perfect
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|