Customer Reviews


9 Reviews
5 star:
 (1)
4 star:
 (2)
3 star:    (0)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:
 (4)
 
 
 
 
 
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
 
 
Only search this product's reviews

The most helpful favorable review
The most helpful critical review


2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars It worked for me
Maybe it didn't work for others, but it certainly helped the furrows between my brows. It's , of course, not as good as Botox, but it helped soften the furrows at least by 50% I'd say and I paid $140. It lasted over 2 years since I only used it on the furrows. So I'd say it's worth this price. You do have to use it a while before you see results.
Published on November 21, 2007 by Barbara Erwin

versus
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Doesn't work
I used StriVectin for about 3 mos for a stretch mark caused by prednisone. I didn't notice any change whatsoever. Some of the reviews above look they were written by people selling competitor products, so I would not take them very seriously either. Overall, StrVectin didn't do anything for me. Save your money -- by the way, at the suggestion of my dermatologist I used...
Published on September 30, 2007 by Ari S


Most Helpful First | Newest First

6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars Doesn't work, September 30, 2007
By 
Ari S (Philadelphia) - See all my reviews
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
I used StriVectin for about 3 mos for a stretch mark caused by prednisone. I didn't notice any change whatsoever. Some of the reviews above look they were written by people selling competitor products, so I would not take them very seriously either. Overall, StrVectin didn't do anything for me. Save your money -- by the way, at the suggestion of my dermatologist I used something called Activor Stretch Mark Erasor and my marks faded considerably, they aren't gone and it's not perfect but it worked a lot better then StriVectin. Just my 2 cents, hope this helps.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


11 of 15 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars I wanted so much for this to work..., March 17, 2006
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
A complete waste of money. I still have all my stretch marks
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars It worked for me, November 21, 2007
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
Maybe it didn't work for others, but it certainly helped the furrows between my brows. It's , of course, not as good as Botox, but it helped soften the furrows at least by 50% I'd say and I paid $140. It lasted over 2 years since I only used it on the furrows. So I'd say it's worth this price. You do have to use it a while before you see results.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


5 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars hype, September 20, 2007
By 
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
hype hype hype. all hype. the only thing that topical creams CAN do is moisturize. You can get very good moisturizers at drugstores, and need not spend 60-100 dollars for them.

i'm sorry to tell all you folks out there hoping for miracle wrinkle cures that your ONLY options to get rid of those lines are 1. don't get any in the first place and 2. cosmetic surgery.

prevention is best cure. for all you folks who don't have huge wrinkles yet, AVOID prolonged sun exposure, drink lots of water and eat lots of fruits and vegetables. living healthy is your best fight against aging, not shedding cash on "miracle" creams.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars worse product ever, October 19, 2007
By 
Johanna P. Minard (Cathedral city ,Ca.) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
I was very dissappointed in this product , I wrote a review and got prompt attention a call saying i would recieve a refund if i took my review off . i did that . never recieved my refund. will never purchase from this company again. although i will use Amazon again.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1.0 out of 5 stars Waste of Money, May 21, 2010
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
I tried StriVectin, think I paid over 100.00 for a tube of it. I was using it to help diminish wrinkles and keep my face looking some what youthful. It did nothing, except make my bank account smaller. I have started using Retin A - it is awesome. I have noticed a big difference in my face having an even tone, smoothing, smaller pores. In my opinion, there is nothing better than Retin A. Don't buy the over the counter versions.. that is a waste of money.. get the prescription kind. I use .05% and .01%
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


2.0 out of 5 stars Did nothing for me, October 31, 2008
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
This did absolute nothing for me. It did not reduce my stretch marks at all. Didn't make them worse either! But I would not recommend it as I think it's a waste of money, unfortunately..
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


4 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars This is good, but Derma Step is still the best!, May 10, 2006
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
I had tried all kinds of skin care systems, with different levels of success, but in the end, the Derma Step system works the best, with long lasting results. You can get a free trial and see for yourself here: awesomestufffree.com/dermastep
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


1 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars it is necesarry for all women, January 8, 2006
This review is from: StriVectin-SD "Better Than Botox?" by Klein Becker Intensive Concentrate for Existing Stretch Marks 59.15 ml 2 oz. (Misc.)
perfect
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Most Helpful First | Newest First

This product