8 of 22 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Meadian Variations, December 5, 2003
This review is from: The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought) (Paperback)
Although you'd hardly know it by looking at recent sales, Axel Honneth is one of the world's major intellectuals; and has perhaps the most advanced sensibility in social theory today, as evidenced by this book and his earlier *Critique of Power*. Both are crisp, lucid expositions of themes drawn both from classic sociology and German Idealism. Honneth has done much to "re-sociologize" the work of the *second* Frankfurt School workgroup. Here he follows the lead of Hans Joas and treats George Herbert Mead as a substantive social theorist rather than a "pragmatic" wish-fulfiller; and this according to the principles of *ego psychology*.
In the 80s and 90s ego psychologists were scorned as psychological "River Rouge workers", but worse things have existed -- and furthermore, the principles of ego psychology provide a firm grounding for discussing questions of desert and other "normativities" found in moral discourse. Which discourse perhaps ordinarily obeys a none-too-transparent logic, a question raised by the recent work of Martha Nussbaum and Amartya Sen on "welfare economics" outside questions of political desert; and Honneth's none-too-opaque constructions provide a solid grounding for raising necessary question the legitimacy of socialist strategies still obsessed with unclear questions of "micropower".
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No