Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your email address or mobile phone number.
Studies in the Gospel of Mark Paperback – June 19, 2012
Top 20 lists in Books
View the top 20 best sellers of all time, the most reviewed books of all time and some of our editors' favorite picks. Learn more
Frequently Bought Together
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
About the Author
More About the Author
Top Customer Reviews
Hengel makes many major points in this book. Mark, he argues, was "written at a clear geographical distance from Palestine...Numerous Latinisms point to an origin in Rome" (p 29). Furthermore, "the connection between Peter and Mark, which in fact goes back to the first century and is attested independently" (p 47) is too strong to be debated.
Hengel rejects the argument that Mark is a "conglomerate of anonymous, popular and collective tradition" (p 47).
He notes that the name Peter in 16.7 and later at the end forms an "inclusio, through which the evangelist deliberately...is stressing the unique significance of Peter" (p 51).
As far as the title, Hengel insists that the lack of the smallest shred of any other name for the gospel is important. "The unanimity of testimony to the titles of the Gospels, for which there are still no variants of any kind in this early period, rules out a late origin" (p 66) for the title.
Although some scholars have argued that the Second Temple Jews were careless about titles, and that writings were frequently anonymous, in fact, from the time of Ben Sira, in 180 AD, the use of titles became frequent.
As for the early Christians, "The earliest Christian writings--the letter of Paul--bear the name of a real author. This is a feature...of earliest Christianity" (p 73), as shown by I Clement and the letters of Ignatius.
The early church derived from Second Temple Judaism a belief that oral tradition was as valid and the equal of scriptural tradition.Read more ›