Most Helpful Customer Reviews
|
|
19 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Very Readable; One of the Best in My Experience, February 27, 2006
I have now in my 3rd semester of using this nursing textbook. I understand the hatred for textbooks in general, but hatred for this textbook specifically is beyond me. In contrast to the many other reviews on Amazon, I have found the book extremely well written. I have likely read every word of over half of this textbook and have found it to be the most helpful of all of those textbooks we have used in the nursing program with the exception of Lehne's Pharmacology text which is exceptional.
I would go so far as to recommend this textbook as a useful tool for a practicing nurse (not a student) to purchase as an at-home reference to read prior to entering a new field of critical care or med-surg nursing or to touch up on areas which have been missed.
The general format of the book is within each body system or area of nursing, first a chapter or two of background information the physiology and pathophysiology of the systems are included. Then nursing functions within that area are presented. First health history and noninvasive physical assessments are discussed, followed by common diagnostic coverage. There are tons of tables and charts which make learning easy.
In summary, I found this book to be one of the most readable and useful of my double-major college experience. Highly recommmended.
http://www.hantla.com/blog/pivot/entry.php?id=234
|
|
|
35 of 41 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
and thus the nursing students speak. . . . , August 1, 2004
I just graduated from the second largest nursing school in Texas and we used this textbook for two semesters, (the school has a contract to use only Mosby textbooks). I, along with many of my fellow classmates, hated this textbook for a number of reasons. First, I found the content to be "wordy," confusing, and often times contradictory. The bottom line is that it's a poorly written text. There are grammatical errors throughout the text that made me absolutely cringe and there was not a week that didn't go by that we didn't have to approach our professors asking them "what are they trying to say here?" In fact, some of us were thinking of contacting Mosby publishing and asking them to have a non-medical English professor proof-read the text before publication. It's interesting to note that we found this same problem with other Mosby textbooks: Pediatric, maternity, foundations, etc. The only time we didn't have a problem with the text was when we did our psych rotation. The Mosby Psych text was not ready and so we had to go with another publisher: Saunders, which was far superior to Mosby. In fact, I asked my clinical professor why the school didn't use Saunders and that's when I learned that the school was contracted with Mosby. Damn Politics! I would go as far to say that the main reason I made it through Nursing school was because I went out and bought the Saunders (and Lippincott) textbooks. Anytime I didn't understand what Mosby was trying to say (which was often!) I would refer to Saunders or Lippincott and the light-bulb would always come on. Bottom line: avoid Mosby if you can.
|
|
|
17 of 19 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
This Book is Potentially Dangerous, January 13, 2006
I am a nursing student and former editor with a Master's degree in English.
This may sound extreme, but I think this book is dangerous. The problem with this book goes beyond wordiness, poor organization and contradictory information. It involves a process.
The student dedicates an hour or two reading a chapter, puts the book down and says, Boy, I've worked hard; I must have learned something.
And, yes, the student has worked hard. Very hard. The student has waded thigh-high in verbiage for nearly two hours. So, he's right to think he's worked hard to understand the material.
But that doesn't mean the student has learned a commensurate amount. He hasn't.
In other words, this book is deceptive. You work hard, so you think that translates into knowledge, but what you're working hard to do is to understand what in the heck the authors are saying.
This book needs a no-nonsense editor. Someone who understands that more words doesn't mean greater clarity.
The school I attend uses this book. I suffered the first year; the second year, I never touched this book. I bought a different one.
If you're a student, don't waste your time, like I did. Your hours will be better spent with other texts.
|
|
|
Most Recent Customer Reviews
|
by Linda Anne Silvestri MSN RN
See all Editorial Reviews
