|
There is a newer edition of this item:
|
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
50 of 61 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Somewhat informative, but entirely untrustworthy,
This review is from: The Study of Language (Paperback)
THE STUDY OF LANGUAGE is a basic linguistics introductory published by Cambridge University Press. Generally CUP's linguistics textbooks are the best in the field, so I acquired this book to see how its basic introduction was. Unfortunately, I was left very disappointed, and doubt that this is a trustworthy introduction to the field.The first warning sign is that there is no biography of the author George Yule, and therefore the reader cannot see how he is qualified to prepare a textbook, where his graduate degrees are from, etc. The author then goes on to pepper his work with urban legends, such as the assertion that English spelling comes from Dutch printers, and the tired yarn that William James had a run-in with a crazy old lady who believed the world was on the back of a turtle. However, the greatest mark against the book comes in its use of Bill Bryson as a source. Bryson produced two popular-linguistics books over ten years over, even though he had no training in linguistics. Many linguists have condemned the books for their abundance of urban legends, misunderstandings, and total lack of error-checking ("Eskimo's have 50 words for snow", "Russian has no word for "engagement ring" or "fun"). In THE STUDY OF LANGUAGE, Yule uses questionable passages from Bryson's books to illustrate points, and even seems to recommend them to students. Concerning other aspects of the book, it does not seem usable. Yule spends very little time on phonetics and phonology, and introduces only concepts found in English, even though most students undoubtedly wish to know about more exotic languages. The insubstantial offerings on phonetics and phonology make this book entirely unsuitable for students of philology; how can you teach the comparative IE philologists of tomorrow if you don't even mention laryngeals? Yule also has an annoying tendency to speak to the reader as if he was a child. While this is an undergraduate textbook, it is written at the reading level of a high school work. The epigraphs of each chapter are amusing, but any writer who quotes "Beavis and Butthead" is certainly not teaching at an intellectual level. In summary, I recommend against the use of THE STUDY OF LANGUAGE as a textbook. The book is clearly not trustworthy, and does not seem an effective and rigorous introduction to linguistics. I feel it would be better to teach from Cambridge University Press' individual introductions, such as Laver's PRINCIPLES OF PHONETICS, Lass' PHONOLOGY, etc.
12 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Best overall choice.,
By Samuel Chell (Kenosha,, WI United States) - See all my reviews (TOP 100 REVIEWER) (HALL OF FAME REVIEWER) (REAL NAME)
This review is from: The Study of Language (Paperback)
It's not the most comprehensive, analytic, graphically-appealing of the many linguistics texts out there. But for undergraduates I've found it to be the most readable and practical. Students can handle the book in a single semester, insuring that they will come away with an understanding of what linguistics is about. If the goal is to produce linguists, I'd look to other texts.
12 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A good general introduction,
By A Customer
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: The Study of Language (Paperback)
This book is a good general introduction to the field of linguistics, and it can be used in a course on "linguistics lite", or as the basis of a more indepth course, if the instructor supplements it with other materials. Since the book includes so little example material, I have gotten good results when I've paired it with the Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language, which is a wonderful source of illustrations and specifics. (Students can buy both books and still come out cheaper than if they had bought just one of the really miserable introductory texts that are in common use.) It has some good exercises in it, but I've found that the instructions need explaining, because for some reason, even though they seem clear, my students find them confusing.In general, I liked this book very much, as did my students, but there is one very serious defect, which the instructor must address. The typesetter chose to use a sans serif font for phonetic transcription, and the result of this is that the character for a high front lax vowel is indistinguishable from /l/. This is very confusing for the students, but I've found that making up my own vowel and consonant charts as a handout has remedied the problem. I hope this is fixed in the next edition.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|