Studying the Jew: Scholarly Antisemitism in Nazi Germany [Hardcover]

Alan E. Steinweis (Author)

Book Description

ISBN-10: 067402205X | ISBN-13: 978-0674022058 | Publication Date: April 15, 2006

Early in his political career, Adolf Hitler declared the importance of what he called “an antisemitism of reason.” Determined not to rely solely on traditional, cruder forms of prejudice against Jews, he hoped that his exclusionary and violent policies would be legitimized by scientific scholarship. The result was a disturbing, and long-overlooked, aspect of National Socialism: Nazi Jewish Studies.

Studying the Jew investigates the careers of a few dozen German scholars who forged an interdisciplinary field, drawing upon studies in anthropology, biology, religion, history, and the social sciences to create a comprehensive portrait of the Jew—one with devastating consequences. Working within the universities and research institutions of the Third Reich, these men fabricated an elaborate empirical basis for Nazi antisemitic policies. They supported the Nazi campaign against Jews by defining them as racially alien, morally corrupt, and inherently criminal.

In a chilling story of academics who perverted their talents and distorted their research in support of persecution and genocide, Studying the Jew explores the intersection of ideology and scholarship, the state and the university, the intellectual and his motivations, to provide a new appreciation of the use and abuse of learning and the horrors perpetrated in the name of reason.

(20070701)

Editorial Reviews

Review

In his meticulously researched study, Alan Steinweis reconstructs the academic networks that provided an aura of respectability for antisemitic persecution. Studying the Jew exposes the culpability of scholars who collaborated with Nazi race policy and nevertheless continued their careers after 1945 with barely a hitch. If one wants to understand the mentality of "desk murderers," this is an excellent place to start.
--Claudia Koonz, author of The Nazi Conscience

By demonstrating how Nazi scholars and professors perverted their scholarship with a hatred of Jews, Alan Steinweis has written a work of great importance. "Jewish Studies" was an antisemitic movement within the universities that included theologians, historians, sociologists, biologists, and others across the academic disciplines. This brilliant new book reveals how the academy became nazified, shaping a new interdisciplinary enterprise: pathologizing the Jew.
--Susannah Heschel, author of Abraham Geiger and the Jewish Jesus

Although the complicity of various professions with the Nazi regime has been well demonstrated, Alan Steinweis shifts the focus beyond the free professions, hard sciences, and technocrats to scholars in the humanities and "soft" social sciences. He is concerned with how scholars in these disciplines both legitimized the regime's insistence that there was a "Jewish problem" to be solved and lent their expertise on Jewish matters to help the regime shape its destructive policies. Steinweis makes clear that this "tainted" scholarship was not done by a tiny minority of "quacks" and infiltrating radicals but was produced by respectable and mainstream scholars.
--Christopher R. Browning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

In this excellent work of enduring importance, Steinweis offers new insight, astute judgment and fresh research concerning the antisemitic scholars in Nazi Germany who lent intellectual respectability to the policies of racial persecution. Studying the Jew is an essential sequel to Max Weinreich's classic of 1946, Hitler's Professors. It is a valuable contribution to the extensive history of politicization of scholarship in modern dictatorships.
--Jeffrey Herf, author of The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda during World War II and the Holocaust

Steinweis...uses a voice that reflects a dispassionate, academic tone, characterized by careful analysis of both the research and motivations of an array of scholars who studied and published on various aspects of 'The Jewish Question,' from the early 1930s through the very close of World War II...Despite the application of this 'research' that influenced to varying degrees a wide range of Nazi policies--up to and perhaps including The Final Solution--Steinweis's review of specific scholars and their work reflects precisely the integrity lacking in those he writes of...The measured manner in which he addresses this important area of Holocaust history, including describing some of the post-World War II successes some of these scholars enjoyed in their professional careers, may, for some, lack a sense of the emotion-laden moral outrage we Jews so often want to see expressed...Yet, Studying the Jew helps us in no small way understand an aspect of what can otherwise be an unbearably painful part of our collective Jewish experience and consciousness.
--WLL (Jewish Book World )

[Steinweis offers] a compact study of Nazi scholarship that raises challenging questions to those of us engaged in scholarly research.
--Tim Cole (History )

Steinweis proceeds by analysing the published works of several scholars representative of the major disciplines to which Judenforschung (research on Jews) was key: race science, theology, history, and sociology. The result is a rich and fascinating little book that convincingly demonstrates the way in which the humanities and social sciences "coordinated" with the regime, much as the professions and industry did; and how these scholars made Nazi desiderata central to their own concerns, whether out of conviction or opportunism...For anglophone readers, the book is an excellent introduction to the subject of scholarly anti-Semitism.
--Dan Stone (Journal of Genocide Research )

This vastly intriguing volume is a paragon of scholarship.
--Sheldon Kirshner (Canadian Jewish News )

About the Author

Alan E. Steinweis is Professor of History and Director of the Center for Holocaust Studies at the University of Vermont.

Product Details

• Hardcover: 214 pages
• Publisher: Harvard University Press (April 15, 2006)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 067402205X
• ISBN-13: 978-0674022058
• Product Dimensions: 9.4 x 6.3 x 0.9 inches
• Shipping Weight: 1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (6 customer reviews)
• Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,406,272 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

16 of 17 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars When 'Jewish Studies' was nefarious, May 4, 2006

By 

N. Ravitch (Savannah, GA United States) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Studying the Jew: Scholarly Antisemitism in Nazi Germany (Hardcover)

Many colleges and universities now have programs or departments in ethnic studies, or specifically in Chicano Studies, Jewish Studies, etc. And we think that is fine, although some twenty or thirty years ago some academics questioned such fields.

But in Nazi Germany "Jewish Studies" were big on campus. They were the place where ambitious and/or anti-semitic academics -- biologists, demographers, sociologists, criminologists, historians -- lent their academic skills and insights to the Nazi program of denegrating Jews as foreign, dangerous, insidious, and noxious to Germans.

No one claims that without seemingly scholarly studies of Jewish communities in Lithuania and Ukraine, or of Jewish marriage patterns in Leipzig or Frankfurt, the Nazi would have in any way been impeded in their plans for the elimination of Jews from Europe. Nevertheless many academics -- some with splendid credentials -- were willing to use their talents in the service, ultimately, of genocide, whether they saw this clearly or not a few years before.

Nothing here is surprising, since scholars have been showing for decades how much German elites helped and favored the Nazi assault on liberal, democratic, socialist, and Jewish life in Germany and beyond Germany. But it is good to have the way this occurred shown in some specificity. Alan Steinweis has written a most timely and important little book and it deserves to be read and pondered. Scholars and intellectuals have often betrayed their calling -- in America as well as in Europe -- but rarely has this taken place with such murderous consequences. The nature of scholarship, objectivity, science, and learning is laid very bare here for all to see. It needs to be more than a blame-the-Germans game, for it could very well happen here -- indeed, in some ways it has already happened here, with regard to slavery, African-Americans, Jews, and non-northern European immigrants. It can happen again.

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Hitler's "Scientific Antisemitism", February 22, 2010

By 

John M. Lane "statesman and philosopher" (Hardin, Montana, USA) - See all my reviews
(REAL NAME)   

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Studying the Jew: Scholarly Antisemitism in Nazi Germany (Paperback)

This is a review of Professor Alan E. Steinweis' excellent book entitled STUDYING THE JEW: SCHOLARLY ANTISEMITISM IN NAZI GERMANY which was published in 2006 by Harvard University Press. This book is only the most current in a series of other publications by Professor Steinweis on Hitler's Third Reich and its handling of what Nazis euphemistically described as "the Jewish Question."

Steinweis brings an impressive array of sources to bear in his description of how Nazi scholars served their Fuhrer in the academic arena. He shows how German scholars responded to Hitler's oft-repeated statement that a "movement like ours mustn't let itself be drawn into metaphysical digressions. It must stick to the spirit of exact science. It's not the Party's function to be a counterfeit religion." (HITLER'S TABLE TALK, p. 49).

Instead, the Fuhrer preferred that National Socialism remain a counterfeit science. Skulls were measured and demographics analyzed in scholarly tomes complete with graphs, charts, illustrations, footnotes and extensive bibliographies all of which demonstrated with scientific precisions that Jews were "a race" which threatened to contaminate and destroy the "Aryan Master Race" like some evil "virus."

Hitler's "scientific antisemitism" didn't seek to convert Jews over to Christianity. It sought instead to destroy them. You don't convert a "virus." You kill it and an estimated five to six million innocent Jewish men, women and children would pay the price for the Fuhrer's counterfeit science before what is now called "the Holocaust" finally ended in 1945.

Professor Steinweis introduces us to the scholars who supported Hitler's scientific antisemitism. He places them within what he describes on pages 14-15 to be a "three tiered phenomenon."

The lowest tier was the most familiar, to me at least. Brownshirted thugs beating up Jews and laughing at crude depictions of them on posters and in Jules Streicher's notorious STURMER are what I always thought about when the term "Nazi" was mentioned. Nazi street thuggery was certainly prominent and effective at times, but it was reinforced by two other tiers.

This second tier included such things a motion pictures with sound tracks entitled THE ETERNAL JEW and THE JEW SUSS, both of which featured anti-Jewish plots and characters. Popular radio shows, periodicals and text books followed the same theme as Jewish instructors were forced out of teaching and replaced by more politically reliable Aryans.

This more refined second tier drew its inspiration from the authoritative scholarship of the third tier. This was populated by professors and doctors doing original research on "the Jewish Question" and proving beyond any shadow of the a reasonable doubt that Jews were, indeed, a race and that this race presented a complex and dangerous array of "problems" for other "races" notably the "Aryan race."

Thus, a short, pudgy, swarthy, homosexual, Austrian native possessed of only one testicle became the protector of a "master race" of tall, athletic, blue-eyed blondes who were always pictured as models of physical perfection. To keep them from being "defiled" and "destroyed" by "the Jewish race", it was clear that a "Final Solution" had to be carried out.

And so it was. In this book, Professor Steinweis shows how Nazi scholars justified it.

If you're interested in the Holocaust, National Socialism, Hitler, WW II, Germany, Jews or how science can be twisted to serve evil purposes, you'll find this book helpful.

It's well organized, well-written, authoritative and it earned five stars from me.

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars A Harsh Reminder of the Potential Consequences of the Institutionally Supported Scholarship, July 19, 2009

By 

WAL (Michigan, USA) - See all my reviews

Amazon Verified Purchase

This review is from: Studying the Jew: Scholarly Antisemitism in Nazi Germany (Paperback)

The use of science and scholarship to support government policy, a political movement, or ideology is always problematical. In addition to issues related to the personal bias and preconceptions on the part of the scholar, the potential for unreliability is enhanced by the inherent tendency of all researchers to find what they are looking for (i.e., the tendency to interpret results in such a way as to support their premises) and their need to avoid displeasing the sources of material and institutional support upon which scientists and scholars rely. Perhaps nothing demonstrates this more starkly than Nazi scholarship, where the output was used in the service of evil. It seems to me that understanding how this could have happened can help explain how the personal biases, outlook, and ideologies of scholars and scientists affect their work.

"Studying the Jew" provides several key insights into the basis for Nazi anti-Semitic scholarship. I would mention two in particular that are difficult to accept now, and serve to demonstrate how much thinking on these issues has changed. First, the Nazis scholars fully accepted that the Jews could be categorized as a genetic "race". The science supporting this was almost non-existent, it was instead evidently based on an anecdotal observations and an assumption of centuries of marriage within the community. That is, it is incorrect to assume that their anti-Semitism was irrational or atavistic. Secondly, once it was accepted that the Jews were a separate race, the idea of a competition for resources and its consequences seemed to them to follow logically and unpleasant consequences became relatively easy to accept, which was a key contribution to Nazi policies. In fact, it appears that at least some of the Nazi scholars looked at the supposed ability of the Jews to establish a racial identity as something that the German nation needed to emulate.

The book makes it clear that these academics believed that were applying accepted scholarly methodology in treating the Jews as a race. Given this, key questions that remain to be answered are why they did not question the weak to non-existent genetic foundation on which it rested (i.e., no link between the behavioral characteristics attributed to the Jews and inheritable traits was ever shown) and also why they also did not recognize that the essentially anecdotal evidence on the behavior attributed to the Jews could be the result of their being treated differently, and not the cause of it.