2 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Well known but weak., December 23, 2009
This review is from: Sun Tzu's Art of War: The Modern Chinese Interpretation (Paperback)
This is a good book that is quoted often, but it is not a well written book, nor useful outside of quotes. "The Book of Five Rings" by Miyamoto Musashi is a better read, better organized and more applicable as a transition comparison of ancient asian thought to modern life (which tends to be the use of these books). As far as strategy goes, I have always preferred "Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace" by Luttwak. Another very good book (but Intel related) is "Intelligence and Military Operations" by Handel. The later is tough to get for a good price. Of course there is "On War" by Carl von Clausewitz, often called the most quoted less read military book. In general, "Art of War" and "Book of Five Rings" can be found on the Internet (Google them with the search option of "filetype:pdf"). Getting the book is good for that road trip, writing in the margins, and bookshelf.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
best book on strategy , ever, January 10, 2010
This review is from: Sun Tzu's Art of War: The Modern Chinese Interpretation (Paperback)
Definitely the most profound book on strategy ever written ; war, business, sports... conflict and competition of any kind.
Great for understanding the Chinese way of thinking.
A book that is not easily understood on the first read. I have been rereading it for years. Mercifully short.
General Tao Hanzhang commentaries are very helpfull and insightful. Clear toughts from a man who defeated the Japanese empire and the nationalists backed by America!
Philippe de Vienne
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
5.0 out of 5 stars
One of the most important military books in history, October 3, 2009
The Warring States period Warring States Period 475-221 BCE is a history of constant warfare, of alliances and counter-alliances, and of treaties made and broken. The nature of warfare evolved during the period. During the Warring States period, political stability was impossible to gain by adventurous military action. With the advent of swelling ranks of soldiers, protracted sieges, and an ever increasing drain on state treasuries, warfare became a serious matter for study.
Thus, the opening remark of "The Art Of War" states--without exaggeration--war had become the most serious business of the state, the key to survival or ruin. The author of this and other pithy aphorisms on how to successfully fight a war was Sun Tzu. Sun Tzu scholars place his writing "The Art of War" in the Warring States Period, based on the descriptions of warfare in the text. The book has received great exposure in the west starting in the eighteenth century after being translated by a French missionary. It has been reported that Napoleon studied the text and effectively put many of its teachings to good use. For the past 2,000 years, it has been the most important military treatise in all of Asia, even known by name with the common people. Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese military figures have studied it and employed its concepts to good effect. This is especially evident in the military tactics of 20th century revolutionaries like Mao Zedong and Ho Chi Minh.
The book is comprised of 13 chapters. The thesis of Sun's work is one should employ an army after a thorough analysis mandated by careful planning and the formulation of an overall strategy before embarking on a campaign. Sun emphasizes rational self-control, influenced by Daoist teachings throughout the book.
Chap 1-Laying Plans
18. All warfare is based on deception. 19. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.
Chap 6-Weak Points And Strong
8. Hence that general is skillful in attack whose opponent does not know what to defend; and he is skillful in defense whose opponent does not know what to attack.
The best translation is the Samuel B. Griffith edition
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No