| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
Product Details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
22 of 24 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
One final excellent work,
By
This review is from: Sunlight at Midnight: St. Petersburg and the Rise of Modern Russia (Hardcover)
It was with great sadness that I learned of the death of W. Bruce Lincoln, one of my favorite writers of history. His works on Russia have given me, time and again, new insight into that country, its people and history. This last work is another excellent example of his writing, marred only by what I think is some poor editing. I don't know at what stage of this work Mr. Lincoln died, but it appears that, if he had survived through the final editing stage this book would have been in a different form. There are more than a few redundancies, which should have been picked up by an alert editor, and I'm sure would have been by the author if he had been around to do so. That criticism aside, I thoroughly enjoyed this work, once again learning many new things about the Russian psyche, as brought forth through the history of St. Petersburg. There may be a bit too much about architecture in this work, but I consider it a "work in progress" that will now, unfortunately, never get into the final shape its author intended. It's a loss for all of us.
15 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Occasionally great, but often stodgy,
By gwc (Seattle, WA United States) - See all my reviews
This review is from: Sunlight at Midnight: St. Petersburg and the Rise of Modern Russia (Paperback)
Lincoln's "Sunlight at Midnight" has some excellent moments, but is frequently superficial and a little dull. The book is primarily a cultural history of St Petersburg, featuring the usual cast of writers (Pushkin, Gogol, Belyi), poets (Blok, Akhmatova, Brodsky), and composers (Tchaikovsky, Shostakovich). The Romanov rulers and their tastes in architecture are discussed extensively, as are the Soviets and their tastes in censorship.The first three chapters are primarily a cultural history of imperial Russia following Peter the Great's reign. They deal mostly in court affairs and architects, neither of which are particularly interesting. Next come descriptions of Petersburg's literary and musical history, which are spotty and do not compare well with the detail of Solomon Volkov's "St Petersburg". The tone changes abruptly when we reach the late nineteenth century, and the reliance on artistic sources gives way to a more popular account of the revolutionary period. Events are well presented but the story is told too quickly. The months between abdication and Bolshevik takeover, for example, pass in a single paragraph. I would have gladly exchanged twenty early pages on the styles of palace facades for some details of the provisional government's failure and the October coup. The chapter on the Leningrad siege is a masterpiece of narrative history, but the book unfortunately returns to cultural matters and Soviet repression of artists in the postwar period. This is interesting stuff, but not remotely as gripping as the events of the previous decades and written in a cursory style more suited to a review for a knowledgeable reader.
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
A great concept, but an uneven telling,
By
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Sunlight at Midnight: St. Petersburg and the Rise of Modern Russia (Paperback)
In _Sunlight at Midnight_, historian Bruce Lincoln tells the story of Russia through the city of St. Petersburg. This works well, and in many places (like the city itself) it is both beautiful and brilliant. Unfortunately, his history is uneven. The usual cast of characters connected to this place are here: Peter and Catherine the Great, Rastrelli, Quarenghi in the 18th century; Pushkin, Gogol, Faberge, Dostoevsky in the 19th; Blok, Akhmatova, Brodsky and Lermonotov in the 20th. The association of these great minds and personalities with the city breathe life in the cultural telling of the history of Russia through the story of this marvelous city.
However, as a previous reviewer has noted, the emphasis Lincoln puts on the events of the city are a bit skewed. The tremendous expense Catherine and Elizabeth invested in object d'art is interesting, as are the details of the construction of the Winter Palace and (numerous) other royal dwellings in and around the city. But to spend such an inordinate amount of time discussing this while only briefly addressing the two decades between the wars seems out of balance. Similarly, the post-war history of the city was addressed in really a cursory manner compared to the amount of detail given during its growth in the early and mid-19th century. These criticisms aside, the history of St. Petersburg makes for a fascinating narrative of broader events in Russian history, from the failed Decembrist revolt in 1825, to the revolutions of 1905 and 1917. This is a book I would certainly recommend for those traveling to St. Petersburg, given the detail and connections between landmarks and larger events in Russia (and the Soviet Union.) I do wish Lincoln had addressed the unique - odd may be a better word - place St. Petersburg has in Russia. It is a stunningly beautiful city, and is immensely popular with Westerners: it is the most "Western" of Russian cities. But it is not really Russia. This awkward truth is pointed out in various places (as the city is being built, during Napoleon's invasion, during the Terror), but I believe it warranted more consistent reminding to the reader: St. Petersburg is a "window on the West" in a very real sense of Russia being locked outside of Western Europe, looking in; imitating, being influenced by, but certainly not a participant in the West - and as such, not entirely "Russian", either. Lincoln is a wonderful writer, and his retelling of the 900 seige during World War II and descriptions of the marvelous collections of art (now in the old Winter Palace, the "Hermitage") are first rate. His love for the city is evident in the writing, and in many respects, the concept of national history told through its most influential city works as a narrative thread. Certainly worthwhile for those who are familiar with the place, or for those intending to go.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
|
|
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|