From Publishers Weekly
A former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. and Clinton foreign policy adviser, Soderberg offers this cogent study of the unilateralism that she believes has taken over American foreign policy and military intervention. The argument that ignoring U.S. allies (and even neutrals) interferes with the administration's own stated goals of peace and increased democracy is familiar, but Soderberg's deep knowledge of the mechanics of diplomacy, as well as of the players and issues, allows her to assess recent moves in depth: the book carries more than 1,150 footnotes. Along the way, we get a defense of Clinton's actions toward bin Laden (and other Clintonian policies) and various swipes at neoconservatives and neoconservative doctrine). Some readers will feel that Soderberg's rehashing of interventions in Somalia and the Balkans do not argue for multilateralism as a guarantee of improved politicomilitary outcomes. And the negative views of the "New Europe" on the aspirations of the Franco-German-Russian axis are not much taken into account—though everything from the Oslo accords to troubles in Haiti is. But as a file from the opposition on the current administration's tactics, this is a satisfying document.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From Booklist
Commentators from both red and blue sides of the best-seller lists have occasionally found common ground in criticizing, albeit for different reasons, the Clinton administration's attempt to recast the U.S. role in the post-cold war world. Clinton wielded American influence with either too much ambivalence (leading to terrorism) or too much arrogance (leading to terrorism). This book by one of Clinton's foreign policy advisors, is a cogent critique of the current administration's hyperpower hubris and a vigorous vindication of the Clinton team's pursuit of elagant solutions to impossible situations. The U.S. may be the most powerful nation, Soderberg argues, but subscribing to the "superpower myth" of American omnipotence has led to dangerous miscalculations in Iraq and antipathy worldwide. Clinton, restrained as he was by American voters' limited tolerance of fights in which they "had no dog," understood the global equation and the limits of American power. But Soderberg neither whitewashes Clinton's failures nor looks entirely backward; rather, she advocates a humble and realistic foreign policy.
Brendan DriscollCopyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
--This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
See all Editorial Reviews