In addition many photos of Earps appeared for the first time, including those of Wyatts parents, grandparents, secret second wife, his sisters family, many still living at that time, and some of the authors informants whom the public was astonished to learn had known both Wyatt and his last wife very well indeed and were, moreover, still very much alive. This points up one aspect of overcoming skepticism of editors who all seemed to think the Earp Saga was as ancient as Washington crossing the Delaware how could there be living witnesses to such "ancient" events? Well, they werent that ancient.
Such a book naturally arrived like a bombshell in the Western History field. Critics rushed in, even attacking its allegorical title, obviously without having read the book, since they failed to perceive that its title didnt imply that the man Wyatt Earp had literally been murdered, but that hed been figuratively "killed off" by writers and replaced by a glowing myth, whom the author dubbed "Super Marshal" or "St. Wyatt the Just."
This publication also in due time revived interest in a Wyatt Earp legend that was being sent down the tube by specious debunking. It polished the tarnished Wyatt Earp image so that his restored fame revived the town of Tombstone, Arizona. The big draw there today as a result is, of course, Wyatt, his brothers, Doc Holliday, and the misnamed Gunfight at the OK Corral.
Moreover, advance knowledge of this forthcoming book reversed the original intent of Hollywood to portray Wyatt as a psychopathic klller in the forthcoming HOUR OF THE GUN, since the author met the Director in Tombstone and learned what he intended. Hollywood was dissuaded from more debunking by the authors informing them that Wyatt had living close relatives who might land on them like a ton of bricks if they distorted the image of their beloved "Uncle Wyatt." Interestingly a new Director showed up in the credits.
Even the author's severest critic held this book up at a meeting of Western historians and said every Earp Buff should read it. Very true! Also the public at large should read it and learn not to be too smug and placid in making assumptions about possessing ultimate knowledge. It is not unreasonable to suppose it should be used in college history courses, even if the Earp imbroglio is not considered academically respectable, since, respectable or not, Wyatts strange apotheosis demonstrates the universal historical process of "Myth Making." The tracks of the myth makers in Wyatts case were still clear to read when author Boyer came on the scene.
This is a republished hard cover version, almost similar in every respect to the original, with an added new Introduction by the author that is, itself, worth the price of the book.
