30 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
A waste of time., August 19, 1999
By A Customer
Haining claims to have discovered documentation that proves the existence of The Demon Barber of Fleet Street during the late 1700s - early 1800s. Unfortunately, nowhere in the book does he cite his references or make clear exactly where he found this documentation. Without this vital information, it's difficult to accept Haining's claim that Sweeney Todd actually existed. The book is a work of fiction and should be marketed as such.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
17 of 23 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Tedious, August 13, 2001
While I'm grateful anyone wrote a book on the topic, this is a numbing look at the "facts." It's hard to believe such a slim book on such a rich topic is this dry and uninteresting. Half the problem is that the three or four antecendents of Sondheim's Sweeney Todd are awash in weak indistinguishable characters and developments that do not benefit from close study. The details of melodramas like "The String of Pearls" et. al. just do not engage me.
Haining himself is tight-lipped and emotionally indecipherable. Just try to figure out what his tone is. It's not a good late-night tale of murder, it's not a crime dossier, it's not thrilling or even disturbing. There is no dramatic arc to his writing. You get the sense that he would have preferred the whole story composed as a giant chart of figures, or that his actual task was to trick readers into belief by sinking them in made-up citations.
It was an enormous effort to pick this book up after each pause, and continue.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Sweeney Todd and Margery Lovett- a Nightmare Pair, October 9, 2008
This review is from: Sweeney Todd: The Real Story of the Demon Barber of Fleet Street (Paperback)
Sweeney Todd's crimes struck horror into the hearts of eighteenth century Londoners, and continue to chill and fascinate two hundred years later. According to the legend, Todd was a barber with a grimy shop on Fleet Street. When solitary victims settled into his chair for a shave, the `Demon Barber' would pull a lever that opened the floor beneath the chair and pitched them into the dark cellar below. If the fall did not kill them, he would cut their throats, and then help himself to their valuables. Todd disposed of the bodies with help from accomplice Margery Lovett, who baked their flesh into meat pies that she sold in her Bell Yard shop. The nightmare pair claimed over 160 victims before authorities stepped in and brought their spree to a halt.
The unbelievable victim count, the fantastic revolving chair, and the two centuries that have passed since he cut his last victim's throat have led crime historians to question whether or not Sweeney Todd really existed. Even the flesh-into-pie method of concealing his crimes has a Grimms aura of unreality about it. Peter Haining attempted to set the record straight in this book, which was originally published in 1993, and re-released in 2007 in the wake of the popular film starring Johnny Depp. He doesn't fully succeed.
`Sweeney Todd: the Real Story of the Demon Barber of Fleet Street' is a well-written account of both the Demon Barber's deeds and the London that he lived in. But the problem is that Haining does not list his sources. In 1993 footnotes were not the norm outside of academic texts, but authors usually compensated by identifying source material in the book itself i.e. "According to the People's Periodical of November 1, 1846..." We're given a lot of intriguing information that cannot be verified. Haining describes Todd's trial and execution in vivid detail, yet neither event appears in the official records. Discriminating readers are left with a sense of hollow enjoyment. We want to trust such an entertaining book, but we can't.
This could have been a five star book, but the sense of uncertainty it leaves me with forces me to accord only three.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No