6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Tamron Di, May 12, 2005
This review is from: TAMRON A06 AF28-300MM F/3.5-6.3 XR Ultra Zoom Lens for CANON (Electronics)
This is a great lens and unless you have the $4,000 Canon you will be quite pleased. However, for the digital Canon get the Tamron 28-300mm f3.5-6.3 XR Di LD Aspherical Macro Ultra Zoom Digital Lens for Canon SLR Cameras instead. The Di is designed specifically for the Digital Canon and is the same money.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 11 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good all round lens for Canon EOS 10D, December 30, 2003
This review is from: TAMRON A06 AF28-300MM F/3.5-6.3 XR Ultra Zoom Lens for CANON (Electronics)
I have been using this lens for a couple of weeks now and over all have been very pleased with the results. I have shot over 500 photos (I love digital photography!) and for the price you cannot beat the wide range and over all function of this lens. Sure there are better and faster lens out there but they will not cover the zoom range and you will pay out the nose for a brand name lens. I have to admit I use PhotoShop to tweak all my photos but for me, that is part of the fun. This is the only lens you need to carry in the old camera bag!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
This is a Lens You Will Use, November 10, 2004
This review is from: TAMRON A06 AF28-300MM F/3.5-6.3 XR Ultra Zoom Lens for CANON (Electronics)
I have the older version of this lens. It is not the world's best piece of glass, but it goes everywhere with me. It's relatively light-weight and does what it is supposed to do. Not spectacularly. But when I travel, I don't want anything heavy or fussy. I take this lens and a wide angle (to get complete buildings or monuments in the picture) and that's it. You don't look conspicuous carrying a big photographer's bag.
You can pay a lot more and get a much better lens. But if you spend the money and get a great Canon L lens, you're going to end up leaving it at home since it's so heavy and intimidates people (forget about getting casual shots).
My rule of thumb is: when the tripod mounts onto the lens, not the camera body, the lens isn't portable.
I also shouldn't say this---but the lens is relatively indestructible. I had the Tamon 28-200 before this, and I've fallen off things with it, and the lens still worked. Plus it's cheap enough (for a lens) that you don't worry about it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No