Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain and over one million other books are available for Amazon Kindle. Learn more
Qty:1
  • List Price: $42.00
  • Save: $3.50 (8%)
In Stock.
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Gift-wrap available.
Add to Cart
FREE Shipping on orders over $35.
Used: Good | Details
Sold by FPQ Books
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: The cover is clean but does show some wear. The cover has slightly curled corners. There is light highlighting or handwriting through out the book. Item ships secure with Fulfillment By Amazon, Prime customers get 2nd day at no charge!
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Add to Cart
Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain Paperback – January 31, 1985

ISBN-13: 978-0674867291 ISBN-10: 0674867297 Edition: Reprint

Buy New
Price: $38.50
21 New from $24.99 24 Used from $5.95
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
$5.43
Paperback
"Please retry"
$38.50
$24.99 $5.95

Free%20Two-Day%20Shipping%20for%20College%20Students%20with%20Amazon%20Student




Frequently Bought Together

Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain + The Classical Liberal Constitution: The Uncertain Quest for Limited Government + Why Progressive Institutions are Unsustainable (Encounter Broadside)
Price for all three: $88.85

Buy the selected items together

NO_CONTENT_IN_FEATURE

Save up to 90% on Textbooks
Rent textbooks, buy textbooks, or get up to 80% back when you sell us your books. Shop Now

Product Details

  • Paperback: 376 pages
  • Publisher: Harvard University Press; Reprint edition (January 31, 1985)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0674867297
  • ISBN-13: 978-0674867291
  • Product Dimensions: 0.9 x 6.3 x 9.5 inches
  • Shipping Weight: 1.1 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (7 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #387,613 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Richard A. Epstein is Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law at New York University School of Law, Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, and James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus of Law and Senior Lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School.

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, read author blogs, and more.

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
7
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See all 7 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

36 of 40 people found the following review helpful By John S. Ryan on July 16, 2001
Format: Paperback
This fine book by Prof. Richard Epstein has probably been more influential than the casual reader may be aware.

The heart of Epstein's claim is that _anything_ the government does that imposes any sort of "cost" on anybody amounts to a "taking" for which the Constitution requires just compensation. We all know how this is supposed to work as applied to the usual exercise of eminent domain. But Epstein casts his net wide and argues that the takings clause applies to all sorts of things you never would have thought of -- welfare programs, rent control, jiggery-pokery with the national currency, you name it.

The impact of the book is evident mainly through "negative" evidence. For example, some readers may recall that during the Clarence Thomas hearings, somebody asked Thomas if he believed the stuff in this book (as the Congresscritter in question clearly did not). I think Thomas managed to duck the question, but the point was made. And at any rate, it tells you something that somebody found it important to _ask_ the question in the first place.

Then, too, my own property-law casebook remarks somewhere near the end that Epstein's views on "takings" have not been found convincing by too many people. Interesting that the book still finds it necessary to mention his work, then.

So check it out. Sure, it's radical, and (let's admit it frankly) it's probably not a correct interpretation of the framers' intent. But if you're not a tax-and-spend Congresscritter, maybe you'll find it as pregnant and alluring a suggestion as I do. And it's one of Epstein's best books; I think he wrote it before he had completely converted to utilitarianism. You don't have to agree with it, but you should at least learn why Federalistas are afraid of it.
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
29 of 34 people found the following review helpful By James V. Delong on August 2, 1998
Format: Paperback
The human right to own and use property is a bedrock of our basic values and freedoms. Epstein's classic book is a seminal (and accessible) analysis of the complex legal and philosophical issues involved. Its original publication in the mid-1980s was also an important political event; it helped trigger the current movement to reinvigerate the right to property, in the Congress and in the Courts. With the Del Monte Dunes case up in the Supreme Court, the argument is getting even hotter. Takings is essential for anyone who wants to understand the issues.
James V. DeLong
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
11 of 11 people found the following review helpful By D. W. MacKenzie on March 19, 2008
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
The author of takings sorts out some vital issues. This book sorts out eminent domain issues, based on a clearly described economic theory of government. Epstein settles the 'Lockean Proviso' issue, and reasons through many other issues. For example, he makes the case for flat taxes over so called progressive taxes. But above all, this book establishes that anything that the government does constitutes a taking of some kind, and takings are only justified in very limited circumstances.

Takings is the best reasoned critique of modern transfer states that I have seen. This is one of a few books that has really changed the way I think about political economy. Every Law and Public Policy student should read this book, as should David Souter.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: Paperback
Richard Allen Epstein (born 1943) is a Professor of Law at the New York University School of Law, as well as associated with the Cato Institute, the Hoover Institution, and the Heartland Institute. He has written many books, including Mortal Peril: Our Inalienable Right to Health Care?, Why Progressive Institutions are Unsustainable (Encounter Broadsides), Design for Liberty: Private Property, Public Administration, and the Rule of Law, etc.

He wrote in the Preface to this 1985 book, "This book is about the conflict between the original constitutional design and the expansion of state power... I argue that the eminent domain clause and parallel clauses in the Constitution render constitutionally infirm or suspect many of the heralded reforms and institutions of the twentieth century: zoning, rent control, workers' compensation laws, transfer payments, progressive taxation." He later adds, "In what follows I shall advocate a level of judicial intervention far greater than we now have, and indeed far greater than we ever have had. But at no point does the argument depend upon a belief in judicial activism in cases of economic liberties... the courses indicated are necessary implications derived from the constitutional text and the underlying theory that it embodies." (Pg. 30-31)

He poses his basic question, "Would the government action be treated as a taking of private property if it had been performed by some private party?
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Customer Images

Search