Most Helpful Customer Reviews
29 of 31 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
Perhaps the agony of Consuelo, December 11, 2002
By A Customer
Great men often leave great pain in their wake. So it seems from Consuelo de St. Exupery's writings about her relationship with her husband Antoine de St. Exupery. The book covers the time from when the couple met in Buenos Aires and the way Antoine (or Tonio as Consuelo called him) completely took over her life until he left Consuelo in the United States to return to France in during WWII. For those who question the authorship, this was most certainly written by a woman who lovingly supported by her husband's endeavors. Her pain can be felt through the words relating her feelings on his inattention, negligence and infidelities. The marriage endured despite situations that most independent women today would consider intolerable. In light of the situations Consuelo experiences; she comes across as strong, intelligent, enterprising woman. She dealt with conditions during WWII in France that were common at the time, but today would leave many people unable continue with any sense of dignity. The question arises as why Consuelo did not leave Tonio. There are some passages that allude to the possibility of ending the marriage. It seems that Tonio would show up and create a situation where she would no longer have legal grounds to divorce. For those who love the book The Little Prince by Antoine de St. Exupery, the Tale of the Rose gives interesting insight as to why the Little Prince was having trouble with his Rose.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
28 of 37 people found the following review helpful:
1.0 out of 5 stars
Dissenting view, March 1, 2007
This review is from: The Tale of the Rose: The Love Story Behind The Little Prince (Paperback)
As American Idol judge Randy Jackson would say: "You want me to keep this real, don't you?" Well, the reality is that anyone coming to Consuelo de Saint Exupery's THE TALE OF THE ROSE is arriving by way of THE LITTLE PRINCE, and any interest there is in what this woman has to say is directly related to her role as her husband's muse and as his inspiration for the Rose in his classic tale. Sadly, the reality is also that THE LITTLE PRINCE is mentioned here exactly once, on page 293 (hardcover edition), a betrayal of the promise implied by the book's subtitle, THE PASSION THAT INSPIRED THE LITTLE PRINCE.
The remaining 307 pages are the disjointed ramblings of a meritless opportunist. It's hard to know where to lay the blame in matters of style and tone (awful and awfuler) in a translated work such as this, but blame for the excruciatingly dull content can safely be laid at the author's feet. This is a long slog through the tedious facts of a dysfunctional relationship with no insight whatsoever into her own or her husband's actions. She is self-centered and self-serving. More disheartening, however, is the depiction of Antoine de Saint Exupery. I think it is natural while reading THE LITTLE PRINCE to equate the author with the Pilot and therefore to romanticize him. How disappointing to discover he is a deceitful lout.
Of course this is only one side of the story, and at some point in the future I will seek out an objective biography of Antoine. Sadly, this memoir has done nothing to enhance my appreciation of his great work. In fact just the opposite is true, and so for now the Little Prince's star is shining a little less brightly.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
Not an Opportunist, March 2, 2011
This review is from: The Tale of the Rose: The Love Story Behind The Little Prince (Paperback)
This is a pretty frank memoir of a dysfunctional marriage - but not one without tender moments and passion.
Was Ex a Saint? No. Does that change the fact that The Little Prince spoke to questions we all feel in our hearts but are taught not to question as adults? No. The guy was tremendously flawed...but he knew it. And somewhere, in his restlessness, he loved his wife in his own way. Not the love people dream of, but affection nonetheless.
Is her book angry at times? Is her depiction of her husband dark at times? Yes. And it is a real reaction to his life with her but also to his final bomb....his death. You sense she is illogically angry at him for being dead. And she had to of loved him to write this decades later.
It is a sad but sincere tale and provides insight into a key character in The Little Prince - NOT the author's thoughts on his tale or insights into what things mean. BUT, if you read this you will understand his love for his rose.
Life isn't always black and white. And just because people aren't perfect, that doesn't mean that they wish they were and that the world would be better as well.
One final thought...people here post on what an opportunist she was....she didn't even publish the book. It was found in a drawer ages after her death. It was likely a cathartic experience for her and she can't be faulted. The woman could have made money off the book while she was alive if she wanted. Where was she an opportunist? Writing, to a person like her, would have been very cleansing.
Just my thoughts.
Cheers
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|