Most Helpful Customer Reviews
28 of 35 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
Another Calendar, October 2, 2005
Having heard Andrea Mitchell discuss this book on the radio, I set aside a few other books to read it as her work experience and my interests are a perfect match. Sadly, autobiographical books can provide dramatic and interetsing insights or they can simply be a calendar of events. Ms. Mitchell's book is a calendar of events.
What may work on television in sixty second tidbits does not work for her in this book. She offers no insights, only a listing of events. The classic example is her meeting with King Faisal's daughter after a dinner when the King's daughter offers to bring in a few "draping veils" so that her guests could see what it was like to wear one. Ms. Mitchell tells the reader of the event, but takes not a moment to inform the reader of the conversation that took place with the daughter while and after they were trying the veils on and thereafter. That conversation and insights therefrom are what I look for in a book such as this one.
The book could be a decent read to someone who is unfamiliar with the period or unread about the events of the past twenty or so years or to someone that likes to read a calendar with an occasional, yet undisciplined and unsupported "shot" at the Republicans.
If you have read President Clinton's My Life, not itself a spellbinder, there is nothing in this book that will not be a reprise.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
An Analytical Eye Cast Backwards, August 10, 2006
I began taking interest in Andrea Mitchell's reportage because of her hard-boiled demeanor on Don Imus's late radio program. Unflappable, funny, and professional, these appearances were enough to lure me to her "behind-the-scenes memoir." And I'm not sorry to have read it. Mitchell may be "just" a TV journalist, but she is a strong writer and a keen analyst.
Perhaps the best part of TALKING BACK is its review of the last few decades of world and national events that it provides. Mitchell's after-the-fact analysis on the news that she has already covered gives the material a refreshing and even educational new angle. Revisiting these stories is interesting; for example, I had forgotten how horrible and divisive the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings were.
To be sure, there are some problems with the book. Reading about her attendance as a guest at White House soirée after soirée made me wonder about her objectivity. Mitchell is perhaps overly coy about her own life as well. After 400-odd pages, I found no reference to her birth year, and her marriage with Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan is never described as being much deeper than "he is my biggest fan."
SIDELIGHT: My favorite mixed metaphor from the book: "It seemed tailor-made for someone who had cut her teeth covering Frank Rizzo."
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A ....."different" kind of memoir, August 6, 2006
Many of this book's reviews complain that Mitchell's autobiography is more history than memoir. That's totally true, but here's why I think she can get away with it--almost:
Andrea Mitchell is a journalist. Unlike many journalists now who love BEING the news instead of REPORTING the news, Mitchell maintains the highest journalistic standards and I think her book shows that. Unfortunately, it makes for pretty terrible autobiographical writing. The reason she can almost get away with it is because her bad autobiography shows in the most obvious way what a great journalist she is! Let me put it another way: Mitchell's trouble writing about herself shows how ingrained the sense objectivity is in her (not that any writing is ever purely objective, but I digress.)
As someone born in 1981, I honestly enjoyed Mitchell's history of what made the news since the sixties--it's pretty interesting and well-written. I guess the problem is that I bought a book about Andrea Mitchell, not history. The sense of self-censorship really overpowers the book; Mitchell is ridiculously guarded. She's insightful about everything except herself!
In the end, I had fun reading her "memoir" and I think her difficulty writing about herself actually does reveal a lot about her. I think also that it might have behooved her to wait until retiremement--or whatever her version of retirment will be--to write her memoir. Maybe she'll give it another shot, and we'll see a more revealed Mitchell.
But hey, I liked it anyway.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|