Tamrac 574201 Velocity 2 Compact Messenger Camera Bag (Black)

by Tamrac

Product Details

• Product Dimensions: 5.8 x 9.8 x 9.2 inches ; 1.2 pounds
• Shipping Weight: 2 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)
• Shipping: This item is also available for shipping to select countries outside the U.S.
• ASIN: B000067O81
• Item model number: TA5742
• Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
• Date first available at Amazon.com: May 24, 2002

Customer Reviews

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

8 of 9 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent little bag, November 10, 2002

By 

Mom (Mercer Island, WA United States) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Tamrac 574201 Velocity 2 Compact Messenger Camera Bag (Black) (Electronics)

This is a very nice bag, big enough to carry a traditional film SLR with an extra lens, or to carry two digital cameras. That's why I bought it: to carry a large, extended zoom digital camera plus a smaller ultracompact as well. It's big enough to carry the two cameras, their chargers, batteries and memory cards...yet it's a pretty compact package: it's not sprawling and floppy like some bigger bags.

All in all, nice amount of carrying space without being too bulky, and a good deal as well

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Almost perfect, June 29, 2007

By 

Carolyn (New Hampshire USA) - See all my reviews

This review is from: Tamrac 574204 Velocity 2 Compact Messenger Camera Bag (Blue) (Electronics)

Great size, not too stiff and holds all kinds of camera equipment without seeming too big. I can fit my Nikon D80 with lens plus an extra lens (fairly long), an SB600, batteries, filters, wallet, cell phone (pocket on the side) and other misc. The only thing it's missing is padding on the top and perhaps a top handle. Not sure why there's no padding on the top, there's plenty of room and I plan to add it myself.

It's a good bag for a day trip or longer.

And the color represented here is not correct. It's closer to a navy than a royal blue. There's plenty of pockets including a zippered one in the back that isn't shown here.

2115|R1Z1N0ESI7OAWV;2115|R2YG3WGIBE3LX7;