Customer Reviews

Tamrac 5547 Adventure 7 Photo Backpack (Gray/Black)

5 star:		(58)
4 star:		(40)
3 star:		(7)
2 star:		(1)
1 star:		(0)

 

 

First, this should really be called a Photo DayPack. It has two distinct areas: one well padded area for photo gear, the other unpadded for things like sweaters, etc.

The camera compartment is not huge, but it will accommodate most peoples digital SLR, mid-range zoom, telephoto zoom and flash, and a few other modest size accessories. It's not a very good bag for a gadget freak you can't decide what to take, so takes everything.

The top compartment serves two useful functions. It gives us a nice, somewhat roomy area for carrying odds and ends; and it extends the bag length so that it fits comfortably on the back. This design is also much lighter than most backback designs, which makes it more suited to those such as myself who don't like to lug tons on my back.

For those of you wanting to lug around all of your gear - then this bag is not for you.

I on the otherhand don't have a lot (canon 20d, 70-200 lens, 18-55 lens, flash and charger. I can fit all of my stuff in here fine. And if I know I don't want to carry all of my stuff - great.

The top is actually bigger than what I thought. For now, I leave my 70-200 lens attached to the camera and put it in the top part. ANd I put my wallet and keys down below instead. This is only because I don't have a smaller zoom lens yet that I want to leave attached which will then store the camera in the bottom section as well as the 70-200 lens in the bottom section. I on'y do this because that's the lens I always use and don't want to attach and detatch on account of dust. So - there you have it. It's not HUGE and it really does hold alot.

There are mesh compartments on the side that do hold water bottles. There are mesh compartments in the top that hold my wallet/pda and keys and sunglasses.

The bottom has rigid compartment barriers which I like but it's all about your taste.

Bottom line - if you don't have 200 dollars to sink into a bag - then this is a great bag. I wanted a bag that I could afford so I could spend more money on a better lens.

I hope this review helps those who are debating whether to purchase this backpack. Here is what I have in the lower portion of my bag right now (which is all my equipment) compare the dimensions provided to what you own:

- Canon Digital Rebel XTi 10.1MP Digital SLR Camera (Black Body Only) (which is attached to:)

- Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras According to Sigma's website: Diameter 76.6mm X Length 122mm (3.0 in. X 4.8 in)

- Tamron Autofocus 28-75mm f2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) for Canon SLR Cameras (off the camera) According to Tamron's website: Diameter x Length = ø73mm x 92mm (2.9 in x 3.6 in)

- Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Camera Lens (off the camera) Dimensions (Diameter x Length)= 41.0mm x 68.2 (1.6" x 2.7")

- In the last two bottom compartments (which could hold lenses instead of what I carry) I have:
- Four 67mm colored filters each in their own HUGE hard plastic protectors
- One camera cap
- One back lens cap (for the attached Sigma)
- One pocket guide for the Canon XTI (very tiny)
- One 67 to 52mm step ring in flexible plastic

How does it fit? Very well. I have NOT manipulated the dividers and they are in their original place. I have room to stack another short lens on top of the Canon 50mm if I ever buy another short lens. It is important to note that the Sigma 70-300 attached to the XTI is a smidge too tall and pushes lightly into the top compartment space (which is separated by material filled with what I guess to be foam padding).

Now I guess it is time for my complaints...
I am a huge fan of the BIG purse movement. I LOVE room for all my personal belongings. I love being able to carry EVERYTHING with me. In my purses I am able to hold a hoodie, six chapsticks, several lip glosses, a few games, checkbook, oversized wallet, snacks, calendar, Tylenol, water bottle, hand wipes, cell phone, two pairs of sunglasses, breath mints, pens, coin purse... oh I am sure I am forgetting things. Nevertheless, I assumed a backpack would be able to fit at LEAST this in the upper portion. I was wrong. I knew the dimensions before buying and tried to simulate the size at home. I figured I would have to cut back on my "essentials" but I didn't realize how much. My compromise? The hoodie will be slipped through the belt buckle and tied in place and I will have to learn to live with a little less when I travel with this backpack.

So with the upper size constraints, why did I buy this pack?

Obviously, (from my purse contents) I needed a daypack. The Tamrac differentiated itself from others in several ways. It was necessary for me to have the water bottle pockets. Cold and wet water bottles do not mix with electronics (cell phones, cameras, etc.) and paper (checkbooks, calendar, etc.) and the mesh outer pockets became a deciding factor. This ruled out the Lowepro Orion Trekker II Camera Backpack (Black). The Tamrac Adventure 9 Photo/Computer Backpack (Grey/Black)was another contender (because of the slightly larger size) but I hated the idea of extra weight due to the notebook pocket I would never use. Additionally, I did not like the way the bottom portion of the Adventure 9 opened. From the photos it seemed like a security risk and had the potential to spill out on to the sidewalk. (Though I could be wrong)

Hope this helps!

I have several camera bags and this by far is the move versatile I own and my standard bag for out and about. It easily handles my Nikon D50 with 3 lenses and a flash. I have room for extra batteries etc.

The top compartment was great for carrying my Gortex jacket, sun glasses, power cords and chargers, as well as a baseball cap and more.

It's light enough to carry all day, doesn't make you look too much like a tourist.

If you are considering this - you should also look at the Adventure 9 (#5549). I don't have that one yet, but other than the extra "weight", it looks like another alternative.

I bought this by mail order rather than the 5546 model on the basis that it had a larger top compartment which would fit "a light jacket, lunch or other stuff". Don't believe a word of it. Although the bottom compartment is fine and the pack has some cool features, once you squash in a lightweight parka there's not much room for anything else.
If you need a backpack for an all day trip or travel, the Lowepro Rover AW series would be a better choice, even with the strangely excessive waist straps. In the Rover's top compartment you can easliy fit a parka, lunch, thermos, sun block, cell phone, film, maps etc with room to spare. Any extras can go on the outside secured by the bungee straps and protected by the AW cover when raining.
The reason for buying these sorts of packs is threefold - to protect your photo equipment, to carry other gear that you might need on a short tramp or trip and to be comfortable doing so.
I like Tamrac gear, but sorry, this is not up to its larger tag. If this 5547 model had more room up top for other gear (gussets or another front pouch?) it would get 4 or 5 stars. It is fine if you know its limitations and want small or if you want very small go for the 5546 model.

First, this should really be called a Photo DayPack. It has two distinct areas: one well padded area for photo gear, the other unpadded for things like sweaters, etc.

The camera compartment is not huge, but it will accommodate most peoples digital SLR, mid-range zoom, telephoto zoom and flash, and a few other modest size accessories. It's not a very good bag for a gadget freak you can't decide what to take, so takes everything.

The top compartment serves two useful functions. It gives us a nice, somewhat roomy area for carrying odds and ends; and it extends the bag length so that it fits comfortably on the back. This design is also much lighter than most backback designs, which makes it more suited to those such as myself who don't like to lug tons on my back.

I already have a classic photo back pack. It is big, bulky,thickly padded, screams "photo back pack" and essentially does nothing else but that. It's always in my closet. Even if I were ever to go on a true "trek" with it, there's no room for any of the basic non-photographic essentials one should always have with them on a trek in the back country.
I presently have a walking disability. A year ago I flew on a photo trip. I wrestled with a rolling carry on, a jacket, a cane and a shoulder bag full of equipment. I also had flight connections to make. I thought I was going to die lugging all this stuff through the airports and I felt very vulnerable with my hands and attention so fully occupied trying to be a pack horse. I swore that if I survived the ordeal, things would change !

This bag is the absolute answer to all my needs! I carry two bodies, long zoom, short zoom, a macro, tele-converter,a p&s and perhaps even a light meter. The flash goes in a separate rolling carry-on with any long glass that I may bring. Outside pockets are great for a rolled up mag to read and water bottle to sip. Top compartment carries my rain hat, slicker, binoculars, photo gloves, bug spray, snacks, meds,kleenex,handi-wipes, map(s), etc. all with room to spare ! The zip pockets carry cards,batts, dust bulb any filter needs, pad & pens a swiss knife (except on planes !) etc.
All is very nicely balanced on my back, easy on - easy off (and I am a big guy too. No dumb heavy clunky waist pad straps sticking out. My hands are now free for my cane and rolling carry on and I feel far less encumbered and more in control of my environment.
Just for us guys, any standing pit stops do not require your putting down your shoulder bag any longer on those highly questionable wet floors in the restrooms. I have flown to WY, Ireland, Florida and traveled everywhere else in between. This bag is never in my closet because it is always on the road with me ! It also served as a somewhat tolerable pillow one very long night at the Atlanta airport !
The upper compartment is a breeze to access and the top loading camera compartment below means that you always set the bag down on its bottom to access photo gear. This is good because whatever snow, sand or moisture that adheres drops harmlessly away when you wear the bag again. Front loading bags like my "closet" pack means you lay the whole bag down on its back, straps and all, to get at the equip. Then all that stuff is pressed against your clothes when you put the pack back on.

This is definitely NOT a bring everything you own bag. It is a travel smart bag!
This bag gets 5 stars from me ! If your needs are similar to mine then I strongly suggest you give it a hard look !

I hope this helps !!
Austin

For those of you wanting to lug around all of your gear - then this bag is not for you.

I on the otherhand don't have a lot (canon 20d, 70-200 lens, 18-55 lens, flash and charger. I can fit all of my stuff in here fine. And if I know I don't want to carry all of my stuff - great.

The top is actually bigger than what I thought. For now, I leave my 70-200 lens attached to the camera and put it in the top part. ANd I put my wallet and keys down below instead. This is only because I don't have a smaller zoom lens yet that I want to leave attached which will then store the camera in the bottom section as well as the 70-200 lens in the bottom section. I on'y do this because that's the lens I always use and don't want to attach and detatch on account of dust. So - there you have it. It's not HUGE and it really does hold alot.

There are mesh compartments on the side that do hold water bottles. There are mesh compartments in the top that hold my wallet/pda and keys and sunglasses.

The bottom has rigid compartment barriers which I like but it's all about your taste.

Bottom line - if you don't have 200 dollars to sink into a bag - then this is a great bag. I wanted a bag that I could afford so I could spend more money on a better lens.

I have owned many camera bags over the years trying to find the right balance between portability and capacity. If it is not easy and comfortable to carry then you will not want to lug it around. If it is too small you won't have the accessories you need and if it is too big you will be tempted to stuff it full of all your gadgets which will make it too heavy. If you don't have your camera, you will inevitably be missing some great shots.

The Tamrac Adventure 7 is a perfect balance for my needs. I carry it every single day and it has traveled with me often. It has been on many hikes, drives through the countryside and plane rides already.

The padded camera section holds my Nikon D70s, Nikkor 18-79mm (usually attached), Nikkor 70-300mm, Sigma 28-300mm, extra battery and charger. The front pocket holds my extra memory cards, card readers, and cleaning accessories. The large compartment on top holds my Gorilla Pod, sunglasses, mp3 player, and often times my lunch with room to spare. The mesh pockets are great for water bottles or temporary lens/battery/sunglass holders.

I have purchased several bags that I quickly disliked something about it.

This one is winner.

Here's a visual aid on what this bag can hold. From a Canon user point of view, the bottom compartment will TIGHTLY hold a 20D fitted with a 17-40mm, a 70-200mm (smaller 4L version), a 17-85mm, a 580EX flash and some small accessories like threaded filters. The outer zip pocket will TIGHTLY hold stuffs like a Game Boy DS, a small MP3 player, batteries and CFs; the pockets inside a pocket are nice.

I have both threaded and 4x6" filters and the 4x6" filters unfortunately do not fit in the bottom compartment, even when some of the above items, such as thread filters and the 17-85mm lens, are removed. A mesh pocket inside the upper compartment will hold these filters and their adapter. The side mesh pockets are pretty small and won't hold much but a small water bottle. Tripod attachment, which requires additional accessories, is poorly placed at the bottom of the bag. I partially place (two legs) my tripod in one of the side mesh pockets and secure the top with a small dog collar.

The upper compartment can hold your lunch and another small water bottle but does not offer much room for additional stuffs.

Overall, I can live with this bag but wish that it has the following... 1) Better tripod attachment location 2) A couple of inches bigger overall and 3) Another zip pocket outside the upper compartment.