21 of 21 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A wonderful book, May 14, 2005
This review is from: Taoist Qigong for Health and Vitality: A Complete Program of Movement, Meditation, and Healing Sounds (Paperback)
There are many books on Taoist exercises. Some are effective, some are frankly, derivative, some are complex, and some are simple.
Mr. Hon's work is simple, effective, and on target. His goal is to provide a series of meditations to bring health and balance to the 5 organs of Chinese medicine and the "Triple Burner" via special sounds, and additional meditations.
His work is focused, yet chatty and even informal, as if he's talking to you directly. Instructions are clear and concise, and he's willing to use metaphors and simple language to make a point, even if they may seem silly (trying to explain how to make specific sounds is rather complex without using examples). I've rarely seen instructions done this well for relatively complex exercises.
If you're interested in Taoist healing practices and healing sounds, or just general health meditations, this is a book well worth reading.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
19 of 20 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Praise for Six Healing Sounds Qigong, October 29, 2004
This review is from: Taoist Qigong for Health and Vitality: A Complete Program of Movement, Meditation, and Healing Sounds (Paperback)
As a practicing physical therapist for nearly 10 years, and as a personal student of Master Hon's, I have been trained and certified by him in the therapeutic application of the Six Healing Sounds. In my professional experience using the SHS with a wide range of patients in my private practice in NYC, I can attest to their efficacy, the ease with which they can be learned and, most importantly, their safety, especially for beginners. Of course, like any modality, the SHS will work differently for different people, but, in my experience, the effects have been uniformly positive across a variety of different clinical populations.
Personally, after having studied with around 15 different teachers for over a decade (some of whom only spoke Chinese), when I met Sifu Hon almost 10 years ago, I knew that my search for my heart-teacher was over - I can't emphasize enough how rare it is to find a Chinese teacher who is not only well-versed in Eastern classical studies (Taoist, Buddhist) but whose knowledge of English and Western culture enables him to transmit the knowledge without losing it's true essence in the translation. By writing this book, Master Hon has made the benefit of his wide experience in this area available to a much greater audience than he was able to before.
I'd also like to address some statements made by some other reviewers about Master Hon's book. First, in regards to the review by "tendar", while it's ok that he didn't like the book (not everyone will) and although I'm sorry he feels that he wasted his money (can't he just return it?), to claim that the SHS is not a Taoist Qiqong practice is incorrect. I don't know what his background or qualifications are or what evidence he has to support his assertions, but even a little research on Amazon of books available in English would reveal that the SHS is a well-established practice within several different school of Qigong, not just Master Hon's. Similarly, his definition of Taoist Qigong practice - "physical movement, breath control and concentration" - though not wrong per se, is incomplete, and shows a somewhat narrow and superficial knowledge of the topic (he might benefit from re-reading the Dao De Jing or the Chuang Tzu a bit more thoroughly). Overall, it is unfortunate that he chose to couch his comments in such a derisive manner: to say that he (and, by implication, anyone else) would have to live to be 150 to derive benefit from the practice is not witty - it is sarcastic and smug, and ultimately negates the possibility of any constructive dialogue that might arise from a legitimate criticism of the text.
Second, in regards to the individual who identifies him/herself as "a reader", I would first question what his/her real agenda is, as he/she spends very little time actually critiqing the book, choosing rather to make a number of inflammatory, even borderline slanderous remarks about Master Hon that he/she has no way of substantiating. Indeed, he/she seems more interested in presenting his/her general opinion on various topics such as the elitist nature of universities such as Princeton (which he/she oddly referrs to as a "snob school"), the misguided priorities of western culture when it comes to assessing a spiritual teacher's worth, the inability of secular logic to adequately describe spiritual experience, and the various ways in which fake spiritual teachers can mislead the public. While these all are certainly important topics, I am unclear as to what they have to do with Master Hon's book, and why "a reader" feels that this is an appropriate venue to express his/her thoughts on these matters. Quite frankly, the rambling, disjointed and seemingly bitter nature of this review is indicative of an individual whoese opinion is, at best, suspect. Not to mention the fact that he/she contradicts him/herself, by first critcizing Master Hon for being too condescendingly over-simplistic, then for being too intellectual. Furthermore, in my opinion, it is quite offensive to accuse Master Hon of being "out to make a buck", when he/she has no idea what Master Hon's actual motivation for writing the book was (although a quick perusal of the forward will give the reader a pretty clear idea). As you will note from other reviews, most people felt that the book was a welcome addition to their own libraries. I should say that "a reader" offers one useful suggestion, which was that the pictures could have benefited from the use of arrows to show the direcetion of the movements. This is not a bad point at all, and the inclusion of arrows might well indeed facilitate their practice. However, to then proport that this omission would make it potentially dangerous to practice the movements is simply not true. While there are definately many qigong practices that could be very harmful if practiced incorrectly, the SHS as described by Master Hon are certainly not in that category. Unfortunately, like "tendar", "a reader" gives no indication of what credentials he/she has that would enable him/her to reliably make such a statement, and it is actually somewhat disconcerting that both reviers make statements of a technical nature without offering any information as to what their qualifications are. Nor do they provide any information about where they teach or how to contact them directly, leading one to conclude that they possess neither the confidence nor courage to receive an answer to their criticisms. One further point of interest, in regards to his/her high praise for Master Jou, "a reader" might be intereted to know that Master Hon was actually at one point a senior student of / assistant instructor for Master Jou when Master Jou was teaching at, of all places, Princeton! So, following "a reader's" logic, if Master Hon is a snob for attending Princeton, Master Jou was even more of one since he taught there. But maybe he/she didn't know that...Finally, to make an additional correction, "a reader" is in error when he/she states that Master Hon has studied for only 20 years: while Master Hon has been publically teaching for over 20 years, he has actually been studying Taoist practice for nearly twice that amount of time, so his/her criticism of Master Hon as lacking sufficient experience is also without any merit. Overall, "a reader" seems like someone who has a lot of anger and frustration that he/she does not seem to be able to vent through an appropriate outlet, but rather expresses at Master Hon for no apparant reason.
In closing, I would recommend Master Hon's book to anyone who is interested not only in learning a basic qigong routine but who would also like a taste of what it is like to study with a classical Chinese Taoist master. If one reads it with an open heart, one may come to appreciate the essence of Taoist practice in its profound simplicity.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Foundation for Taoist Qigong, December 12, 2003
This review is from: Taoist Qigong for Health and Vitality: A Complete Program of Movement, Meditation, and Healing Sounds (Paperback)
Like a single brush stroke that captures the swaying orchids, this book on the Six Healing sounds integrates all the elements of Taoist Qigong: breath, movement, Taoist meditation and mudras. As a life long Taoist practitioner of the Dragon Gate School, I was taught by my masters that the 6 Healing sounds serves as a gateway, especially for beginner, into the profound universe of Taoist Qigong and its inner alchemy. The detail description on the Qigong instruction reveals the author's depth of knowledge and teaching experience. The heart of Taoist approach is simplicity. The 6 Healing Sounds is in complete alignment with this core Taoist philosophy. After 34 years of Taoist Qigong and Taiji practice, I can say that this book truly presents the core of Taoist cultivation of inner alchemy of transformation and healing. The Healing sounds are like pure pristine water that enhances my own Taoist Qigong practices.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
