|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4 Reviews
|
Average Customer Review
Share your thoughts with other customers
Create your own review
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Great Book,
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism (Paperback)
I personally loved the content of the book. The exterior of this book was nice and it looks as if it were new.
8 of 13 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
The Machines Rule (Or Do They?),
By
This review is from: Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism (Paperback)
This collection of essays purportedly addresses the philosophical theory of technological determinism - the belief that human behavior and culture is driven by technology and its unintended (or intended) consequences. Of course, the theory has many nuances and permutations, which are explored in depth by the various writers here. The book starts off with fine introductions to the topic, particularly the opening essay by Merritt Roe Smith and the seminal "Do Machines Make History?" by Robert Heilbroner. Unfortunately the book then descends into standard turgid theoretical obfuscations of dubious usefulness to anyone other than each professor's immediate colleagues. Examples include the standard academic exercise of reinterpreting the ideas of earlier thinkers and calling the results a new theory (Bruce Bimber, Thomas Mina), or forcing existing theories together and taking credit for the resulting "breakthrough" (Rosalind Williams, Leo Marx). Another running issue in this book is a lack of distinction among technology, progress, and modernity, as can be seen in the otherwise fascinating historical report by Michael L. Smith. And as usual for academic books that collect essays by various professors, everybody repeats the basic tenets of the theory at issue before embarking on their particular interpretation or example of interest. One benefit of this book is that the editors (both in their introduction and through the essay selection process) do not try to nail down a particular position on the many nuances of technological determinism, which is healthy for purposes of discussion. Regardless, little is accomplished by the writers except esoteric reinterpretations and feeble grasps for significance. [~doomsdayer520~]
4 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
gives perspective on technological change,
By
This review is from: Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism (Paperback)
This book is a fascinating summary of a centuries long debate in history. Can the development of technology shape large scale historical trends in a society? The essays in the book are as timely now as when it first came out ten years ago. While the authors talk about the general sweep of technology, across history, it lets readers possibly get some perspective on the changes currently underway.
From reading this book, you may get the sense that maybe our age is not unique in experiencing vast technological changes. Whichever side you come down on, in the book's debate, you might now look with scepticism on claims that our age is unique in this regard. Unless of course you go with the Extropians and their siren call of an approaching singularity.
3 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Nice balanced collection of essays,
By
This review is from: Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism (Paperback)
Great collection of ssays from both sides of the fence backed of with concrete examples. Good book for a class touching on the subject.
|
|
Most Helpful First | Newest First
|
|
Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism by Merritt Roe Smith (Paperback - June 2, 1994)
$30.00 $22.64
In Stock | ||