28 of 28 people found the following review helpful:
3.0 out of 5 stars
But for whom?, June 23, 2007
This review is from: The Telescope: Its History, Technology, and Future (Hardcover)
This is an odd book. It was written by an Aussie who now works at the US Air Force Academy. It was originally published in Australia and New Zealand, then republished by Princeton University Press. And I can't figure out who the target reader is.
It is a short book, a bit over 200 pages, broken up into short chapters with magazine article level treatments of various subjects. Despite its brevity, there are many times the author claims he could write so much more if he only had the space. He often alludes to being much more knowledgeable than the reader, yet some of the chapters don't quite get it right, and others give the impression he is simply digesting what he has read in other popular treatments.
He spends a few pages on astronomy before telescopes, then a few pages on the early history of the telescope. Both subjects are covered in more detail in many texts and popular astronomy books. These are followed by a brief sketch of how different types of telescopes work from a geometrical optics standpoint, and then a chapter called "The perfect telescope", which is really a very short, very introductory discussion of diffraction. A chapter with the cute but misleading title "When good telescopes go bad" then discusses why real telescopes can't be built to perform as well as reading a few page article on telescopes would suggest. (Aberrations and all that.)
Andersen then moves into the sensors that record what the telescope is looking at. One chapter skims over cameras, spectrometers, photometers, and polarimeters. He then has a chapter on interferometry. While written at roughly the high school physics level, it starts with the warning "While interferometry is the next big thing for telescopes, it is a complex subject, so some readers may want to skip over the material." I doubt many people would make it this far into the book without being able to understand the very basic treatment that follows.
The cute title "So you want to build an observatory?" briefly covers the difficulty of building a large mirror, choosing a site, and the mechanical engineering of a large device. These appear to be topics he wanted in the book but didn't know where to put them. Next we are in space with the Hubble Space Telescope. If you don't know the history of how they screwed up the primary mirror this includes a relatively good brief history. But the overall history of Hubble here is thin, and there are better treatments.
He's then off on "Advanced telescope techniques", which covers lightweighting, active optics, segmented primaries, adaptive optics, and laser guide stars. But what is on offer is a series of vignettes thrown together rather than integrated into the areas where they enable telescope advancement.
Next come a couple of chapters on applications other than astronomy for telescopes. Laser communication and remote sensing are tossed together in the first. The very first sentence claims "Telescopes are instruments for gathering and intensifying light." Telescopes concentrate light; "intensify" means something else. The next page claims "This increased waveform complexity (called bandwidth) ...". Complexity and bandwidth are different things. You can transmit a very simple signal at very high bandwidth (for example, a sine wave), or a very complex signal at very low bandwidth (for example, Beethoven's Ninth Symphony). (In the latter case you won't be enjoying the music in real time, but you can transmit it at low bandwidth with suitable patience. And for those old enough to remember, an LP is a pretty low bandwidth medium.)
The surveillance section is truly odd. Andersen has apparently surfed the internet and applied flights of fancy to imagine what US spy satellites can do. While it is possible that his speculation about satellite capability is correct (although it seems far fetched), his assertion that such a satellite's altitude has "a reasonable value of 200 km" is hard to swallow. At that altitude there is enough residual atmospheric drag that nothing stays up very long. He finishes the surveillance section with laser weapons. Yes, they use telescopes. But I don't see how they are tied to surveillance.
Next comes another mishmash called "Non-traditional observatories". First he talks about liquid mirror telescopes, which fit the title. But then he goes into solar telescopes which are, to my thinking, quite traditional. He mentions observations back to 1609, and includes a picture of a dedicated solar telescope (the 150 ft tower on Mt Wilson) finished in 1912! After explaining that the "emphasis of this book has been on optical telescopes, as the extension into other parts of the spectrum would constitute an overwhelming amount of subject matter", he then describes observing the Cherenkov radiation caused by high energy gamma rays entering the atmosphere. I suppose it can at least be argued that conventional telescopes are used for this purpose. But this is followed with a discussion of detecting gravity waves! Gravity waves aren't even light, although the detectors do use laser interferometry to (it is hoped) detect them. There is no room in his short book to discuss radio or x-ray telescopes at all, but he finds room for gravity wave detection? I think he just writes about what interests him, which is his prerogative, just don't expect a complete or rigorous coverage of "The Telescope".
He concludes with brief discussions of some recent discoveries in astronomy and some future telescope projects.
While there are some interesting bits to this book, there is no unified story. There are also some things he doesn't quite get right. On the other hand, I can't think of another book that gives a better short introduction to the topics he choses to cover. There are certainly better books on astronomical telescopes, but they give little or no coverage to other uses for telescopes. Andersen's coverage is nether very complete nor always accurate, but it is another viewpoint. I didn't personally learn much from this book, but some readers might. Just approach with caution.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
9 of 9 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Fascinating, wide-reaching, and full of information, June 19, 2007
This review is from: The Telescope: Its History, Technology, and Future (Hardcover)
More than a few amateur astronomers- and I count myself in the group- find nearly as much fascination with the hardware of astronomy and space exploration as they do with the actual viewing. A good fraction of my library is taken over by books on telescope construction, the history of telescopes, testing optics, ray tracing and so forth.
Here's a fascinating and delightful book that is a bit different than the typical book about telescopes. It's written for the educated reader, who isn't afraid to see a little algebra, or some ray tracing diagrams, and because of that it's far more informative and useful than the typical all-about book that tries to explain everything by metaphor. There's historical material, exellent explanations of topics like how achromatic and apochromatic lenses work, telescope technologies used in astronomy, satellites, and elsewhere, and future technologies- spinning mirrors, liquid mirrors and other cutting-edge (and some yet untried) techniques.
It's not just limited to telescopes used in astronomy, either. There's material on terrestrial telescopes, surveillence satellites, industrial appplications and more.
This volume is hIghly recommended for technology junkies, fans of the history of technology, those interested in aerospace, and anyone who is looking for something short of a college text on optics that does a good job of really explaining how optics work.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Detailed, Authoritative and Absolutely Brilliant, September 26, 2007
This review is from: The Telescope: Its History, Technology, and Future (Hardcover)
I have read a number of books on telescope history and technology over the recent past, but this one has got to be one of the very best. The scientific principles are very clearly explained with just sufficient depth so as to allow the interested reader to understand the basic concepts without becoming overwhelmed with unnecessary details. Just about everything is covered, from how a telescope works, its limitations, e.g., diffraction limit, atmospheric turbulence, aberrations, etc., its site selection and its use, all the way to the state-of-the-art technology and techniques that are used to observe the faintest of objects such as extra solar planets. Several topics are discussed here that I have not seen discussed in the other books that I have read on this topic. Appendices are included to explain some math/geometry basics, the nature of electromagnetic radiation and even suggestions on buying one's own telescope. The author's writing style is friendly, authoritative and a model of clarity. Because of this, the book could be enjoyed by anyone - especially those with a fascination for telescopes and astronomy. However, it is likely to be relished the most by science buffs and amateur astronomers.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
