Most Helpful Customer Reviews
62 of 64 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
One of the best books ever, April 29, 2002
This review is from: Tensors, Differential Forms, and Variational Principles (Dover Books on Mathematics) (Paperback)
I don't know how they did it but, this is the book you want to buy if you're trying to learn differential geometry, especially if you're learning general relativity. It takes you from the concepts you are already familiar with into differential geometry faster than any other book I've ever tried (and I've tried many!). Before you know it, you are comfortable with covariant derivatives and Lie derivatives and.. well the list could go on. Do not be turned off by the reputation of Dover books-- "cheap and not worth it!" This is a gem. For those of you learning GR: Buy this book and Schutz's "Geometrical Methods of Mathematical Physics." Read Lovelock and Rund first and then dive into Schutz's book. This will provide you with the necessary mathematical background to handle Wald's "General Relativity" with (some amount of) ease. You might want to try Schutz's "A First Course in General Relativity" before Wald's more advanced book. I've read many glowing reviews on Amazon about books that I "must have" and, quite frankly, they turned out to be poor choices. But in this case I have to say you "must have" this book! It is that good. And it's cheap, so if you do not agree with me, it's not much money out of your pocket.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
30 of 31 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Rigorous, yet informal enough to be a lot of fun., August 8, 2003
This review is from: Tensors, Differential Forms, and Variational Principles (Dover Books on Mathematics) (Paperback)
Many years ago, this became the first book I had ever read about tensor calculus, differential geometry, or classical field theories, and I still have not found a much better treatment of any of these subjects anywhere else.
The notation is often very classical, in the sense that there are a lot of indices, usually referring to coordinate bases, and there is a lot of talk of "transformation laws." While this style can be distressing to more advanced students, those familiar with the beautiful methods of avoiding such structures, I think it is useful to younger students, especially physicists, who yearn for concrete examples. Also, for the one section in which a more formal approach is advantageous, such a treatment is included as an appendix.
The book is also wonderful for its breadth. It is not a "tensor calculus" book, or a "differential geometry" book. It is really best described as a "geometrical methods" book "with applications to theoretical physics." Yet unlike most examples of this now-cliched subject, the breadth of material is matched by a cohesion of style.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
51 of 58 people found the following review helpful:
2.0 out of 5 stars
All in the indices, January 11, 2005
This review is from: Tensors, Differential Forms, and Variational Principles (Dover Books on Mathematics) (Paperback)
As mentioned below, this book concentrates for 330+ pages on a "classical" index-based approach to tensors. Coordinate-free treatment is restricted to a brief appendix. There are only 10 illustrations in this very long book (none in the appendix). That means that you will need to concentrate very hard on the manipulation of many tiny indices in some long and hairy equations.
My hat's off to people who can learn this way, but I am in the camp that expects pictures for geometrical subjects. In this respect, Schutz is a much better book, as well as being coordinate-free from the get-go. (Ditto for Misner Thorne Wheeler and Carroll on general relativity, as well as various works by V. Arnol'd or J. Marsden that deal with this material in classical physics contexts.) I bought this book as a reference -- it might be useful also for people who want to come up with computational approaches to the material.
I might have given the book 3 stars but for the facts that (i) no solutions to exercises (only some of which are in the "show that this stuff = X" format) and (ii) text is filled with "clearly"s, "obviously"s and other superfluities.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
|